The Neviller
New Member
This is the transfer forum- rationality's a foreign concept to most of the people in here.
It's gone particularly special this summer. Fergie retiring has just pushed it all off a cliff.
This is the transfer forum- rationality's a foreign concept to most of the people in here.
That isn't even the same thing, so I've no clue what you're getting at.
When have we ever, as a club, gone in with bids we hope to have rejected as a PR stunt. That's the assertion being made, and it's a ludicrous idea. If we've bid for Fabregas it's because we want to sign him and think we have a chance.
I've yet to see anyone adequately explain how making these type of bids appeases anyone. What does a "PR bid" achieve? How does failing to sign a player show any kind of strength? How does not signing Player B make up for not signing Player A? How does failing to sign a player through not bidding enough money show that we have money to spend?
Seriously, think about it rationally.
I watch Everton a lot (I like Everton, probably because the hate towards them from my Liverpool mates) He is not good enough for the role he played at Everton this year. We have Kagawa and Rooney for that, and that is the kind of player we should always try to have there.
If we sign him as a central midfielder to pair up with Carrick, I'm more confident he can do a great job. I have not seen him to often in that role, but he has a lot of attributes that comes in handy there.
----------Van Persie--------
------Rooney---------------
-------------------Valencia-
---------Kagawa-----------
-----Carrick---Fellaini------
Done. Rooney drifts out wide left from a central position (which he tends to do anyway). Nani and Zaha could take up Valencia's spot and keep the same shape, or Welbeck could come in and have a more fluid attacking 3.
----------Van Persie--------
------Rooney---------------
-------------------Valencia-
---------Kagawa-----------
-----Carrick---Fellaini------
Done. Rooney drifts out wide left from a central position (which he tends to do anyway). Nani and Zaha could take up Valencia's spot and keep the same shape, or Welbeck could come in and have a more fluid attacking 3.
I like it, but we're basically relegating Cleverley as a role player. That's okay and perhaps entirely justified. If we hauled in Fabregas, there'd be no question that Fabregas would be Master Po and Cleverley would be Grasshopper. But I'm just not as sure Fellaini is that massive an upgrade from Cleverley. Maybe he is. He's tooled us on a few occasions, no question about it.
Chasing other targets first, perhaps. I too, was thinking the same though.I reckon if Moyes had any intention to go for him in the first place, it would have been sealed already and he can bring the player along on our pre-season tour, knowing fully well he has a release clause. So it's safe to say we aren't in for him anyway. I mean, why wait till now?
He could be the fall back option, a plan B option, a last resort option. You get the point....I reckon if Moyes had any intention to go for him in the first place, it would have been sealed already and he can bring the player along on our pre-season tour, knowing fully well he has a release clause. So it's safe to say we aren't in for him anyway. I mean, why wait till now?
This transfer is actually going to happen isn't it?This thread going to be as amusing as the Fabregas one. You'll end up paying nearly the same money for the great lunk as you bid for Cesc and the anti-muppets will implode this time.
"That is a problem but we coped quite well. I don't think you can criticise their performance in that respect," said Ferguson. "It was just difficult to handle him [Fellaini] when they were knocking these balls up to him. He is a handful, a big, tall, gangly lad, and they just lumped the ball forward to him, that's all they did. They worked from that base all the time and they got a goal from him, so it's justified. Michael did fine, good on the ball, and he applied himself well; they all applied themselves well.
I'd go as far as saying that he is the antithesis of what we should be trying to achieve.
After the game at Goidison SAF said:
I would want him if he was available on a free transfer.
I was hoping Wenger would do us a favour and buy him.
So long as we don't sign him I don't care. Is the the Evertonisation of Man Utd?This transfer is actually going to happen isn't it?
I wouldn't want him if he was available on a free transfer.
I was hoping Wenger would do us a favour and buy him.
Ruud I said from the start when Moyes was announced that I could see us playing with traditional wingers less often and more with a compact central from 6 and the full backs given even more licence to get forward. In that regard a bid for Baines makes perfect sense.
Chasing other targets first, perhaps. I too, was thinking the same though.
So long as we don't sign him I don't care. Is the the Evertonisation of Man Utd?
- replace manager with Everton manager
- replace coaching staff with Everton coaches
- replace players with Everton players
- buy Everton-class players if you can't get real Everton players
So long as we don't sign him I don't care. Is the the Evertonisation of Man Utd?
- replace manager with Everton manager
- replace coaching staff with Everton coaches
- replace players with Everton players
- buy Everton-class players if you can't get real Everton players
I wouldn't disagree with you except I don't see us paying 20m or whatever the amount is Everton want for Baines. We were a bit leaky in defense last season anyway and we might be wiser to secure a genuinely defensive left fullback rather than a de facto left winger disguised as a left fullback -- if the idea is to say goodbye to Evra. I like Baines a lot, mind you, but I just don't see him as being as pressing a need in light of the known circumstances. To me, the obvious answer is to let Fabio and Buttner compete for the spot, but I'm just a lowly caftard.
As far as wingers are concerned, as of today we've got four -- Nani, Valencia, Young and Zaha -- and until that changes I just can't see us not using the players we already have to the full strengths.
We'd have to do a lot re-engineering to the squad to accommodate a more compact central 6 with Baines being our left back. But then again, I think we're splitting hairs. Because of the poor play of our wingers last season we played a more compact game in our front 6 anyway, yet at the same time no one is seriously suggesting we completely abandon the historic core United philosophy of utilizing wingers and stretching the pitch as wide as possible to create chances off crosses.
It seems to me reason we posters are over the place in recent weeks is that there are simply too many unknowns. We don't know what will become of Rooney or Nani; we have a central midfield problem; there's talk of a central defender acquisition and there is talk of Evra leaving or being shipped off. They're all interconnected, so that the answer to any of these issues has a significxant impact on how we deal with other issues.
Arteta was always too good for Everton.
Arteta had a lower jump to make than Fellaini is likely to
Arteta had a lower jump to make than Fellaini is likely to
Has something happened and I've missed it?Depressing really, I don't think he's united quality, plus, after the fun of Thiago for a couple weeks, and the 24 hours Cesc... this is a bit disappointing.
Nothing, just this thread is getting more active now we've missed out on the other 2.Has something happened and I've missed it?
Phew!Nothing, just this thread is getting more active now we've missed out on the other 2.