sun_tzu
The Art of Bore
Cant we just swap rooney for them both
Once a blue always a blue and all that
Once a blue always a blue and all that
I don't think you'll sell Baines, but I do think you'll sell Fellaini for 20-21m.
It would be stupid for the club to call a bid an insult and then accept a fee only 4-6 million higher than the original.
Your club was stupid in the extreme to make that statement so yes I agree that when they accept an offer just over the 'insulting' one they will sound stupid.
If we sell Fellaini, as i have said previously i would imagine it would be 20m initial fee which could rise to 25m or so.
Just as stupid as a club who bids 12m for a player, gets rejected, and then bids 12m again for them a month later.
We'll get him for 12 million too. Go read that statement SW. Read the wording from your professional Director of Communications. It's the most foolish release I've read.
Why do we even need this creative player? The main thing we have to look at that will be different from last year is SAF's insistence on playing only 2 men centrally. If we play Fellaini and Carrick, with one of Cleverley, Rooney, Giggs, Kagawa, Januzaj or Lingard in front of them, them being allowed to do what they do best will increase creativity in that area. A 4-2-3-1 is the system of choice for many teams abroad, and we cannot match it without one more solid player next to Carrick. We are spoiled for choice we have so many options for the 3 behind RVP in that system, I see no desperate need for anyone else. Where we lack is someone who can sit next to Carrick and provide the base which allows the wealth of attacking talent we already have to concentrate on attacking.
If we look at Bayern last year, they had Martinez and Schweini. No world class creativity there. Far more of a solid reliable base, which then allows for their creative players up front to flourish. I just don't see how we can improve that much by still having only Carrick to fulfil that role, whether we sign a Fabregas type or not, they will certainly not help us much in that regard.
We'll get him for 12 million too. Go read that statement SW. Read the wording from your professional Director of Communications. It's the most foolish release I've read.
Calling Moyes/United out and showing that we won't be messed around as we have no reason to sell them.
Calling Moyes/United out and showing that we won't be messed around as we have no reason to sell them.
Why would you get him for £12m when they've already rejected it twice?
As part of an overall deal including Fellaini the 12 million for Baines will be more acceptable. It's the bigger picture bid now, and if we put in another bid for 31million (guess) then I say it's estimating Baines still at 12m and Fellaini at 19m not adding 1.5m to each of them.
It's all semantics though when it comes to the breakdown.
Cant we just swap rooney for them both
Once a blue always a blue and all that
Martinez would take £30M and spend it on McCarthy and Shaw.
As part of an overall deal including Fellaini the 12 million for Baines will be more acceptable. It's the bigger picture bid now, and if we put in another bid for 31million (guess) then I say it's estimating Baines still at 12m and Fellaini at 19m not adding 1.5m to each of them.
It's all semantics though when it comes to the breakdown.
It's silly in the extreme because we've been pretty decent to you guys in the recent past with players going the other way, and I would have bet money that Moyes would have been very happy to continue that trend where possible.
We should offer £20m for Fellaini and tell them we'll stop pursuing Baines. Everyone is happy.Naa, 31m is not going to do it. Also, there seems to be some belief Everton are more inclined to let Fellaini go but really want to keep Baines.
United were wonderfully generous in giving Everton Tim Howard who had been horrific and Louis Saha who couldn't stay fit for two weeks at a time. For that, Everton should rightfully sell their two best players for about £10m under their market price.
Well personally I don't see why in the majority of games we can't go with Carrick as the holding player and someone next to him as the main creator as we had with him and Scholes. I think particularly with the way we play it's important to have that player who can find the wide players in great areas.
Ideally as I said you have the ability to play both types which is why I've been hoping for a creative player and an understudy for Carrick.
I'm not saying that they were fair prices or that Everton should accept. Also, 38m is silly talk in the extreme.
Tim Howard has been their No1 and very good for them for years, Neville was excellent for them and their club captain for a long time. I'd say that that's a large part of their recent success. Gibson has now gone to be a first teamer for them. These players were all given to them for close to nothing.
We've been good to them recently and that tap could be turned off very easily.
I'm not saying that they were fair prices or that Everton should accept. Also, 38m is silly talk in the extreme.
Tim Howard has been their No1 and very good for them for years, Neville was excellent for them and their club captain for a long time. I'd say that that's a large part of their recent success. Gibson has now gone to be a first teamer for them. These players were all given to them for close to nothing.
We've been good to them recently and that tap could be turned off very easily.
You see I don't see it as under paying. Maybe a few million but not a scandalous amount.You've had a good relationship but it doesn't mean you can underpay on their two best players. At the end of the day, you've given them your discard pile. Moyes, to be fair to him, turned Howard into a good keeper, prolonged Neville's career and worked with Gibson too. The reason you gave him them for next to nothing was because they were either past their sell by date or just not wanted at United, not out of some generous streak Ferguson had.
You're not entitled to talk on this subject if you think 40m is the right price.Talk about patronising! I'd be surprised if they sell for less than 40m ... and even that may be insufficient.
You see I don't see it as under paying. Maybe a few million but not a scandalous amount.
You're not entitled to talk on this subject if you think 40m is the right price.
... You're not entitled to talk on this subject if you think 40m is the right price.
At the end of the day, its is not up to us the supporter what the club pays, it is not our money.