FBI says it has no answers for "Mystery drones flying over New Jersey"

And now the FAA has imposed a drone flight ban in multiple areas of New Jersey due to an "imminent security threat" and threatens to use deadly force if violated. Not sure what deadly force against drones means, but quite the escalation from "it's all perfectly normal and nothing is going on".

This stuff just gets stranger.
 
The initial ones had lighting otherwise they wouldn't be visible at all in the night sky. After this the possibility of copycat actors is quite strong this is why the FAA have issued a ban on drones in the area.

My bet is military penetration testing.
Yeah kinda what i was thinking, or war games in a ‘real’ setting.
 
The FAA has imposed temporary restrictions on drone operations in multiple New Jersey cities, effective December 18, 2024, to January 17, 2025, citing special security concerns. The restrictions prohibit drones within a nautical mile of designated areas, including Hamilton, Jersey City, and others. Violators risk interception, civil penalties, certificate revocation, and possible criminal charges, with the U.S. government

Drone ban suddenly in the area after a month let’s see how active the skies are tonight
 
FAA says that laser incidents reported by pilots over NJ have increased by almost 300% compared to the previous year. This is why this whole hysteria is so bloody unfunny, some of those panicking people are shooting lasers and even guns at aircraft thinking it's aliens or Iranian spy drones. They really need to calm the situation down, so it makes sense that they prohibit drone usage for a while.
 
One day apart. Make it make sense.

Such a Psy-op.

someone-make-this-make-sense-v0-q6e093fluu7e1.png
 
One day apart. Make it make sense.

Such a Psy-op.

someone-make-this-make-sense-v0-q6e093fluu7e1.png
Nothing contradictory or weird if you actually read the articles instead of having an aneurysm over the headlines. The Pentagon says in the Economic Times article that "we've not identified that any of these reported drone sightings were assessed as anomalous or that it presented a national security or public safety risk over civilian airspace in New Jersey or other states in the northeast" and that "In the case of drones flying near or over US military installations, that in and of itself just given the volume of drone flights we see on a given day, is not something that's new" but that they will "continue to take appropriate action if and when it's deemed that any of these drones near US military installations pose a threat".

The article by ABC news does not contradict that at all, stating that "In coordination with the FAA and our critical infrastructure partners who requested temporary flight restrictions over their facilities, out of an abundance of caution, the FAA has issued temporary flight restrictions over some critical infrastructure facilities in New Jersey" and that "We continue to assess there is no public safety threat relating to the reported drone sightings". Makes it pretty clear that they don't see an actual threat, but those security partners are crapping their pants, so "out of an abundance of caution" and "at their request", to soothe them they'll issue some airspace restrictions. You can practically hear the eyeroll in the wording.
They conclude that "Having closely examined the technical data and tips from concerned citizens, we assess that the sightings to date include a combination of lawful commercial drones, hobbyist drones, and law enforcement drones, as well as manned fixed-wing aircraft, helicopters, and stars mistakenly reported as drones".

The only question that remains for me is how that "deadly force" against drones would look like. I wanna see what anti-drone measures they'd actually take. They'll probably do the boring thing, identify the frequency the drones are transmitting on, directionally jam them, and wait for the (hopefully existent) autoland at transmission loss feature to set the drone down on the ground where they can scoop it up. Would be a lot more interesting, but also way more potentially dangerous, if they had some solution to actually grab them out of the air.
 
Last edited:
Nothing contradictory or weird if you actually read the articles instead of having an aneurysm over the headlines. The Pentagon says in the Economic Times article that "we've not identified that any of these reported drone sightings were assessed as anomalous or that it presented a national security or public safety risk over civilian airspace in New Jersey or other states in the northeast" and that "In the case of drones flying near or over US military installations, that in and of itself just given the volume of drone flights we see on a given day, is not something that's new" but that they will "continue to take appropriate action if and when it's deemed that any of these drones near US military installations pose a threat".

The article by ABC news does not contradict that at all, stating that "In coordination with the FAA and our critical infrastructure partners who requested temporary flight restrictions over their facilities, out of an abundance of caution, the FAA has issued temporary flight restrictions over some critical infrastructure facilities in New Jersey" and that "We continue to assess there is no public safety threat relating to the reported drone sightings". Makes it pretty clear that they don't see an actual threat, but those security partners are crapping their pants, so "out of an abundance of caution" and "at their request", to soothe them they'll issue some airspace restrictions. You can practically hear the eyeroll in the wording.
They conclude that "Having closely examined the technical data and tips from concerned citizens, we assess that the sightings to date include a combination of lawful commercial drones, hobbyist drones, and law enforcement drones, as well as manned fixed-wing aircraft, helicopters, and stars mistakenly reported as drones".

The only question that remains for me is how that "deadly force" against drones would look like. I wanna see what anti-drone measures they'd actually take. They'll probably do the boring thing, identify the frequency the drones are transmitting on, directionally jam them, and wait for the (hopefully existent) autoland at transmission loss feature to set the drone down on the ground where they can scoop it up. Would be a lot more interesting, but also way more potentially dangerous, if they had some solution to actually grab them out of the air.

D.E Shorad
P-Hel
Epirus Leonidas
THOR

D.E Shorad is in active service now and was deployed to the Middle East:

https://www.janes.com/osint-insight...mpletes-de-m-shorad-deployment-to-middle-east

P-Hel has also been deployed:

https://www.military.com/daily-news...ser-weapons-overseas-combat-enemy-drones.html

Epirus Leonidas is currently undergoing testing by the USMC:

https://www.army-technology.com/projects/leonidas-high-power-microwave-hpm-system-usa/

THOR has finished preliminary testing but may be overkill for whats needed:

https://thedefensepost.com/2023/05/18/us-drone-swarm-thor/
 
FAA said:
"Having closely examined the technical data and tips from concerned citizens, we assess that the sightings to date include a combination of lawful commercial drones, hobbyist drones, and law enforcement drones, as well as manned fixed-wing aircraft, helicopters, and stars mistakenly reported as drones".

giphy.webp
 
D.E Shorad
P-Hel
Epirus Leonidas
THOR

D.E Shorad is in active service now and was deployed to the Middle East:

https://www.janes.com/osint-insight...mpletes-de-m-shorad-deployment-to-middle-east

P-Hel has also been deployed:

https://www.military.com/daily-news...ser-weapons-overseas-combat-enemy-drones.html

Epirus Leonidas is currently undergoing testing by the USMC:

https://www.army-technology.com/projects/leonidas-high-power-microwave-hpm-system-usa/

THOR has finished preliminary testing but may be overkill for whats needed:

https://thedefensepost.com/2023/05/18/us-drone-swarm-thor/
I know these systems, but they're not going to actually shoot down a drone over densely populated land (at least not their own). They might if there's nothing but wide-open field around, or if they truly think that there is a big actual threat that is better dealt with iin an immediate uncontrolled takedown rather than let it go wherever it was heading. But they're not going to fry some hobby drone and just let it crash wherever in the neighboorhood.
But you don't understand...

UAP=/=NHI = alien and the Von Neumann probes are hidden in plain sight.
Except for when they turn off the light and "go dark", being completely undetectable, of course.
 
Last edited:
I know these systems, but they're not going to actually shoot down a drone over densely populated land (at least not their own). They might if there's nothing but wide-open field around, or if they truly think that there is a big actual threat that is better dealt with iin an immediate uncontrolled takedown rather than let it go wherever it was heading. But they're not going to fry some hobby drone and just let it crash wherever in the neighboorhood.

Except for when they turn off the light and "go dark", being completely undetectable, of course.
The screwed that one up attaching navigation light to them then.