Paul_Scholes18
Full Member
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2014
- Messages
- 13,891
So Lascelles was because I think Arsenal and West Ham are both more likely to score this week than Brighton are. The player in this spot I don't need next week, but I will need someone in GW31 when the fixtures really turn. Most teams playing this week have a tough fixture in GW31, apart from Arsenal and Newcastle. Lascelles against Burnley in GW31 works well. I recognise he is a real differential, but then again I am one of very few wildcarding this week, so small sample against which to compare myself. At 4.2 he becomes a good third sub longer term. If I was free hitting, I'd have a third Brighton defender.
I sold both Maguire and Dias on the wildcard. It was two from Rudiger, Azpi, Maguire and Shaw to be benched. In the end, I went all in on Chelsea for the better fixtures and the stingier defence in recent weeks. Rudiger was very cheap and was set for a rise last night, so he was first choice.. Azpi isn't playing for Spain, whilst Maguire and Shaw both have three England matches, so that also influenced me. I will very likely be buying Shaw or Maguire in the next two GWs for Dallas or Dunk. Happy to play them away at Spurs.
Yeah it might work I just do not trust Newcastle. Lascelles is decent in attack so it could be a great call.
I personally never go 3 defenders from the same side, but that is just me. High risk high reward I guess.