SATA
Full Member
So far his future looks completely sorted: he doesn't want to leave, Barcelona don't want to sell - he might not even give a shit that we keep bidding for him.
This is all on the surface though
So far his future looks completely sorted: he doesn't want to leave, Barcelona don't want to sell - he might not even give a shit that we keep bidding for him.
The negative nellies have decided that £40m is the magical figure to get Cesc. Too bad, Woody and Moyesy don't read the CAF.
Whatever you say, £25m was a derisory bid, and £30m wasn't much better. I can understand Barca's intransigence, if those were the bids we lodged.
We've still got Bebe knocking around at the club, haven't we? Oh for that extra £8m...
Oh, the cheek of Woody to bid an amount that offended the mighty Barcelona. How dare he!
Sorry, I didn't get the Bebe gibberish.
Ha, it's like a permanent match day thread around here. Nothing but muppets who seem eternally disappointed that United are not City or Chelsea. You've got to wonder why they hang around here at all.Oh, the cheek of Woody to bid an amount that offended the mighty Barcelona. How dare he!
Sorry, I didn't get the Bebe gibberish.
Bless you!Wenger rang aaaCesc back in June and he said that he was going to give it another year.
Are we bidding Messi?
What are you yammering on about?
If you make ridiculous low-ball bids, the selling club is liable to tell you to do one.
Ha, it's like a permanent match day thread around here. Nothing but muppets who seem eternally disappointed that United are not City or Chelsea. You've got to wonder why they hang around here at all.
Wenger rang aaaCesc back in June and he said that he was going to give it another year.
You are the one yammering not me.
£25m is not a ridiculously low bid, and the second bid was £30m + add ons. He wasn't sold for much more 2 years ago. Neither has he become any better. In fact he has played out of position in those 2 years. There was nothing wrong with the bids.
Wenger said so to the press.And he told you this over dinner at Ivy did he?
We'd be all over this like a rash if he was leaving.Wenger said so to the press.
How do you bid Messi? Is Messi his own currency value?
It would cost 50m it seems to get the player. More than United would have expected. . Probably United could spend 50m on a player. But the fact remains. Cesc Fabregas is not worth 50m . City and Chelsea can piss away money well over the odds. They can write blank cheques. It's all a big joke to them. If muppets really think United can write blank cheques then that's not Woodwards fault. It's theirs.Sorry, was it a Redcafe poster that talked about "no budget" or was it our club's top brass?
Probably best not to talk big if there's nothing to back it up. It's obviously relatively early days yet, with over a month of the transfer window left, but as things stand I haven't heard a convincing argument as to why we've been so public about everything. That sort of behaviour - like it or not - creates an expectation.
How do you bid Messi? Is Messi his own currency value?
A horrible rash, in an awkward place, that no one is particularly happy to discover.We'd be all over this like a rash if he was leaving.
£25m is a ridiculous bid considering what they paid for him, and the fact he has good time left on his contract. I understand that you begin lower in a negotiation, but I'm not sure about Moyes' comments stating he's not sure whether we'll bid again. By all accounts, we've gone up to £30m plus add ons. It surprises me, given our desperate need, that we're now unsure as to whether to go higher.
We'd be all over this like a rash if he was leaving.
It would cost 50m it seems to get the player. More than United would have expected. . Probably United could spend 50m on a player. But the fact remains. Cesc Fabregas is not worth 50m . City and Chelsea can piss away money well over the odds. They can write blank cheques. It's all a big joke to them. If muppets really think United can write blank cheques then that's not Woodwards fault. It's theirs.
It would cost 50m it seems to get the player. More than United would have expected. . Probably United could spend 50m on a player. But the fact remains. Cesc Fabregas is not worth 50m . City and Chelsea can piss away money well over the odds. They can write blank cheques. It's all a big joke to them. If muppets really think United can write blank cheques then that's not Woodwards fault. It's theirs.
I'm not reading through 5 pages, has anything changed in the last 5 pages?
They paid £27m plus add-ons for him, didn't they? How is £25m a ridiculous bid?
He said he is not sure as Woody is managing the bids.
I'm not reading through 5 pages, has anything changed in the last 5 pages?
It seems pretty clear to me that a climb down now by Barca would have to be at least 50m. A figure that is so insanely more than the player is worth that they do not lose any face. When asked why they transferred an untransferable player they can just point to the fee and say " those English are nuts. What are you going to do?" 40m is nowhere near enough for that.That's quite an arbitrary figure, where do you get that from? Barcelona say he's not for sale at any price and we definitely know he's not for sale for 30m. How do you know that 1) they're not telling the truth, 2) if they aren't, then how can you be sure that 40m won't be enough to sway them?
It's ludicrous because there's no reason to suggest his value has fallen. Especially not when it's us that are in the market for him. It was as derisory a bid as Chelsea's for Rooney.
We've got more money due to TV+commercials and even if we didn't we'd buy Cesc back if it meant selling Wilshere to fund it.You won't, as you don't need him. You have more pressing concerns. Cesc would be a luxury that a team with a tight budget cannot afford.
We've got more money due to TV+commercials and even if we didn't we'd buy Cesc back if it meant selling Wilshere to fund it.
I agree that he'd never go for 25 or 30 million. If those were our first two bids, good negotiation tactic or not, they see never going to be accepted.Whatever you say, £25m was a derisory bid, and £30m wasn't much better. I can understand Barca's intransigence, if those were the bids we lodged.
We've still got Bebe knocking around at the club, haven't we? Oh for that extra £8m...
Whatever you say, £25m was a derisory bid, and £30m wasn't much better. I can understand Barca's intransigence, if those were the bids we lodged.
We've still got Bebe knocking around at the club, haven't we? Oh for that extra £8m...
You have got money but I would think that a Striker, defensive minded midfielder and a central defender were priorities. That would take care of whatever extra money you'll get from the new deals.
As you say, the possibility might be selling Wilshere to fund the move. Which would be a stupid move, IMO. (i.e. if Wilshere is not a permanent crock)