How long will Wenger sit on the money? That's the important question.
I doubt they will do infront of their own fans.
Real couldn't even win and conceded 2 away goals, which is quite sad considering Sanchez and Messi's haven't had a pre-season.
I expect Fabregas to get a little cameo, the ovation will be absolutely deafening when he comes on the pitch.
Too many cooks!!! Fab's the final piece in the jigsaw- let the jealousy and infighting begin!
I'd like to point out that I posted months ago Fab was off to Barca for £35m. I'm ITK you know.
I would point out as well but I am useless at the search function and can't find my post but I did say it.
Where are you now Storey?
Still represents something of a coup, getting a £20mil+ profit on him. Would have preferred to keep him in all honesty, we're going to just have to move on. Last season in some ways prepared us for the inevitability of life without Cesc, so there's not going to be a lot of change in the way of adapting to play without him. Hopefully once Nasri's gone as well (along with others who don't want to be at the club anymore) we can rebuild properly.
There's been a stale feeling around the club for a good while, and this is perhaps what we've been crying out for in order to concentrate on winning games rather than on whose staying or going.
Any confirmation of the fee?
35M is not a joke of a fee ffs. Just because Carroll goes for the same price, it does not mean you can represent everyone's transfer fee based on their ability compared to a hugely over-priced player.
That's a strange point of view. Would Barca be pleased with £30m for the likes of Messi, Xavi, Iniesta etc? It's a shite deal for you, considering how good a player he is and where the market is. But it wasn't your fault in the end, Fabregas made it known it was a one horse race and it looked like it had started to destabilise the club. What can you do?
Thank feck for that.
What will be the next contender for most tedious transfer "saga" ever? The Sneijder one isn't in the same class at this point.
Fabregas' ability isn't represented by £35m. Not unless you completely ignore the market. Which would be ridiculous.
Our hands were tied with there only being one club he was prepared to go to. We could have sold him last summer for arguably more money, but Wenger persuaded him to stay in order to accelerate Wilshere's development and bring him through. As it happened, Fabregas hardly played last season while Wilshere came on leaps and bounds. Fabregas was probably going this summer anyway regardless of whatever happened, so I'm not going to say this wasn't expected.
Our hands were tied with there only being one club he was prepared to go to. Ideally we should have sold him last summer for more money, but Wenger persuaded him to stay in order to accelerate Wilshere's development and bring him through. As it happened, Fabregas hardly played last season while Wilshere came on leaps and bounds. Fabregas was probably going this summer anyway regardless of whatever happened, so I'm not going to say this wasn't expected.
Right, but inflation will just rapidly increase if we're determining players values on what teams like City and Liverpool are starting to pay.
Our hands weren't tied in the sense that Ronaldo outlined 700 clubs he wanted to transfer too? Or did he make it clear from the very start there was only one other club he would transfer too, pretty much exactly the same as Fabregas.
It doesn't really work as an excuse.
This transfer has shocked me. I never saw it coming