Danny1982
Sectarian Hipster
Clearly you have your opinion and I have mine, it is all about opinion and there is no objective way to prove that one player is "better" than any other, but its certainly arguable that in terms of ability he´s one of the best around.
As regards injuires, most players have bad luck over a particular period, its simple probability that very few player ever make it through their career without a spell on the sideleines nursing various injuires. A lot of the time its apparent that Fabregas is so integral to what Arsenal do that he´s rushed back and probably not given enough time to recover - it doesn´t mean he´s a crock.
A pertinent fact for me is that like it or not, while still being miles behind Barca, Arsenal are the closest in terms of the football they play, which is in no small part down to the Fabregas at the heart of the team - in terms of statistics (one of the only objective means of measurement, albeit slightly flawed) they win more games when he plays and average more points. Add to that he´s probably one of a few player who might be able to step into the Barca side and play the same way.
I´m not saying he´s the best player in the world - but I was responding to your post initially which suggested that he´s overrated and would be a waste of money, which I personally don´t agree with having watched him for years in the PL and in teh CL where he´s been consistenly very good since he was a kid.
I agree. We have probably different opinions, although it's not that big of a difference reading your post.. I said I would buy him for 35 million euros (which is a lot of money in my opinion), would you buy a crock for 35 million euros?? Or does it sound like I'm saying he is a waste of money?? Of course not. It's not like either he is the best in the world or a crock who is worth nothing. I stand somewhere in the middle, where I appreciate that he is a VERY good player, but I'd rather spend 50 million pounds on the three players that we signed so far than him alone.