Valencia was decent at RB last season. He never will be a great RB but he does a decent job there in my eyes. I have high hopes for Darmian this season too and we have TFM. I think we're fine at RB for now and should target a CB instead.
Of course he made mistakes. But Valencia's errors aren't mistakes. They are a lack of defensive instincts which make them more likely to occur again.
I can see why you construct your arguments around stats. Any goal opportunity caused by poor defending must fall in the "mistake" bucket. You don't seem capable of differentiating one from the other.
This is a Fabinho thread so I will leave it there.
Never seem him play but from everything I've read he sounds like a younger version of Darmian!
I'm constructing my argument around stats because its the only meaningful way to do so on a football forum. I don't have any videos to show you e.t.c.
Valencia is fast and strong yes. But he is also technically very good. His first touch, his link up play are all brilliant and his crossing is drastically underrated on this forum (yes isn't not as good as it used to be but I seem to remember him being involved in quite a few goals near the end of last season). No full back/winger hits 100% of their crosses. Most full backs/wingers don't even hit 50% of their crosses as they would want to.
One of the reasons we struggled so much last season was due to the lack of attacking influence our full backs had (which are a big thing under LVG). Darmian and Rojo just weren't good enough in the attacking sense and both were suspect at the back as outlined countless times.
Darmian got schooled against Arsenal and Tottenham and LVG even said he brought on Valencia at half time against southampton because Tadic had too much space and also said that he didn't see Tadic in the second half. Rojo is also rash and supect.
One on one Valencia unstoppable and uses his pace and strength to win the battle. Also I find it funny that people saying he's a liability positionally and then when TFM was all over the place positionally when he was playing at right back he was being lauded for the exact same thing Valencia was doing, using his pace to get back into position. And lets be honest, Valencia was nowhere near as much out of position as TFM was in the games he played there.
Shaw is all left foot, I presume you don't want rid of him too? Valencia may be getting on but he's still got pace and power. I'm almost certain that Mourinho will like those qualities a lot in this league. Converting him to full back was one of Van Gaal's better decisions for us. He's so vastly underrated on here despite making a marked improvement to the side on his return from injury.
I'm not against signing Fabinho as the long term successor to Valencia, but I don't like to see a player (Darmian) booted out following a solitary season of limited opportunity.
And this guy is also not that better from the options we have.I don't think we should invest on a minor upgrade.Its better to fix the old motor.Darmian isn't good enough, and Valencia isn't getting any younger.
Time to invest in this guy
Why do you speak as though a right back is different to a fullback? A right back is a fullback. Darmian, Evra, Alves etc etc you could name every right or left back, they are all fullbacks. That's the overarching name for their position. There is no difference. Fullbacks are the 2 positions wide of the central defenders in a back 4.There was a hype surrounding him before he went to Monaco as well. He has been in the spotlight longer than a year.
Darmian could probably improve to be a good RB, but he will never be a FB like Fabinho probably can be (altough I dont believe Fabinho is a typical Brazilian wingback judging from what posters has written earlier). Also Fabinho is pretty apt as a DM and play as DM quite often for Monaco, and we lack defensive options in midfield.
Also it is not just for us Darmian has been underwhelming. He lost his place in the Italian national team to Di Sciglio, who originaly was rated lower than him. I was way more impressed by Di Sciglio during the Euros, both defensively and attacking, but especially attacking where Darmian has his biggest flaw. Also not sure if Darmian can cut it mentally, he looks like a scared boy every time he plays.
He is 22. He can still improve that part of his game. If he has a bit of pace and isnt as slow as Darmian then he should be fine.If he's not good going forward then I don't see the point.
Darmian is also playing the goalscorer onside in this picture after being woefully out of position while Wolfsburg took our left side apart.
Football has evolved. It's not an obsession by United fans for attacking fullbacks, it's an obsession by all football fans. Everyone wants to see a galloping fullback get beyond his winger. It is an essential part of modern football and it is incredibly effective. Why should we hold ourselves to lower standards? The best clubs in world football have brilliant attacking and defending fullbacks.This obsession by Manchester United fans about attacking minded fullbacks amuses me. It really does. I mean I've been following United for quite some time and I cant really think of many attacking fullbacks at United who were actually that effective. Parker was a typical old fashioned defensive fullback. Irwin could attack but you only have to hear this guy for few minutes to know that he was a defender first and an attacking fullback afterwards. Gaz was a decent defensive fullback who could cross the ball, thats was all he could do in terms of attacking. Valencia cant even be considered as an attacking fullback (or a defensive fullback), I mean he cant even cross anymore these days. The only effective attacking minded fullbacks we had were Rafael and Evra. Both played at a time when we had the best 2 of the best defenders in our history and their career took a nosedive (with us) once those 2 great CBs starting showing signs of ageing or retired.
Reading your posts makes me think that the attacking fullbacks was what made the club great but they seriously weren't. Parker, Gaz and Irwin are much better fullbacks than the Rafaels, Darmians, Evras, Silvestres, Rojos and all the attacking minded fullbacks we had. And it also makes sense especially since we're a club who always produced/relied on top quality wingers. Who needs an attacking fullback when you've got the likes of Ronaldo, Beckham, Kanchelskis, Best and Giggs on the flanks. Taking that in account and the fact that Mou is busy adding quality in the team (Mkhitaryan, Ibra, Pogba), is it that tragic to return to a time when a fullback could actually defend and allow the creative guys to focus on their job?
Valencia ?Darmian is also playing the goalscorer onside in this picture after being woefully out of position while Wolfsburg took our left side apart.
Football has evolved. It's not an obsession by United fans for attacking fullbacks, it's an obsession by all football fans. Everyone wants to see a galloping fullback get beyond his winger. It is an essential part of modern football and it is incredibly effective. Why should we hold ourselves to lower standards? The best clubs in world football have brilliant attacking and defending fullbacks.
Who needs attacking fullbacks when you have the likes of Bale, Ronaldo, Messi, Neymar, Costa and Robben? Oh wait... Marcelo, Carvajal, Alba, Alves, Lahm and Alaba say hi.
We have no actual wingers in the team. It's not hard to understand why people want attacking full backs. Even for you Devilish. And Neville and Irwin were more than good enough going forward.
Precisely, and that was the point I was trying to make. I agree with your last paragraph. We should not set ourselves lower standards than the other world class teams, though. I'd say part of the reason that we don't have Baresi-esque players anymore is due to the fact that fullbacks (and defenders in general) in modern football are being asked to contribute going forward, as well. Pique said it in an interview with Rio: "Defenders have to start attacks now, that is what they want you to do. You look at Daley Blind now playing for Man United and Van Gaal has him playing centre-half. That says it all. The reason he is playing centre-half is to start attacks. That is the philosophy in the modern game". Defending has become more rounded. We have phenomenal defenders like Chiellini, Godin, Barzagli etc etc, while also having players like Bonucci, Hummels, Varane etc that are better with the ball. There are many phenomenal defenders still playing today, and perhaps in 10 years, this era will have a few legends of its own. Generally speaking, it is only when one has retired that they are considered a legend of the game.It really didn't. It actually devolved at least in terms of defence. Where are the likes of Maldini, Scirea and Baresi these days? Even today's England's defence is vastly inferior to the defence of just a generation before. The likes of Smalling, Stones. Walker and Jones wouldn't stand a chance against the likes of Gaz, Rio and Terry.
Most attacking fullback play either in a very balanced team or/are used as wingbacks. The rest of the common mortals cant afford having the typical run on the mill attacking fullbacks because THEY ARE A LIABILITY. Take the likes of Darmian as an example. He's a top wingback but with United he struggled massively. Its one thing having 3 top CBs at your back who will cover your every mistake and its another having to defend your ground constantly because one mistake would put the defence into trouble. We could afford attacking fullbacks at a time when we have Rio and Vidic in their prime and with Gaz lending them a hand. We dont have that anymore.
Returning on Fabinho this year the boy had 4 assists. That's just 1 less then our last year's top assist man and at par with Carvajal and Alves, 1 more when compared to Marcelo and 3 more when compared to Alaba and Lahm. Just because someone can defend well that doesn't mean he's a liability in terms of moving forward. Tell them hi btw.
Precisely, and that was the point I was trying to make. I agree with your last paragraph. We should not set ourselves lower standards than the other world class teams, though. I'd say part of the reason that we don't have Baresi-esque players anymore is due to the fact that fullbacks (and defenders in general) in modern football are being asked to contribute going forward, as well. Pique said it in an interview with Rio: "Defenders have to start attacks now, that is what they want you to do. You look at Daley Blind now playing for Man United and Van Gaal has him playing centre-half. That says it all. The reason he is playing centre-half is to start attacks. That is the philosophy in the modern game". Defending has become more rounded. We have phenomenal defenders like Chiellini, Godin, Barzagli etc etc, while also having players like Bonucci, Hummels, Varane etc that are better with the ball. There are many phenomenal defenders still playing today, and perhaps in 10 years, this era will have a few legends of its own. Generally speaking, it is only when one has retired that they are considered a legend of the game.
"Most attacking fullback play either in a very balanced team or/are used as wingbacks. The rest of the common mortals cant afford having the typical run on the mill attacking fullbacks because THEY ARE A LIABILITY". Again... do we not strive to have a very balanced team? Feck, Everton had Baines and Coleman playing as very good, well rounded attacking and defensive fullbacks. Southampton the same with Cedric and Bertrand. I could name plenty more examples, if you'd like, but I believe I've proven my point.
If he's not good going forward then I don't see the point.
I remember Irwin to be excellent at getting forward, scoring and assisting. Before wide forwards cut in and fullbacks supplied the width.
So you've picked arguably 3 of the top 10 greatest defenders of all time, and you're wondering why we don't see many like them? There are many absolutely fantastic defenders today, let's not cherry pick only the bad examples. I'm no Stones fan, but he is just 22. Let's not making sweeping judgements on a lad who's clearly far from his peak.None of them are even near to the old greats such as Maldini, Rio and Zanetti who were defenders first and foremost but could also attack at the same level if not better then all the players you mentioned. That's the thing with football this days. We think that the skill of being comfortable with the ball is somehow as equal as that of being good in actual defending. Take Stones as an example. He defends like a 10m rated defender but just because he's comfortable with the ball he suddenly became a 50m rated CB. I can mention others such as Luiz whose in that same situation
Our defence is not passing the best of times. Prior to Mou we only had 2 decent defenders which were Smalling and Shaw. Mou brought Bailly who seem quite decent but he's still work in progress. If you also take CBJ out of the picture whose good but he's so green that he can piss grass the rest are either shite (Rojo, Darmian, Mcnair) or have been played in defense because they are not very good in playing in their natural role. Considering that we already have Shaw whose comfortable in attacking and defending, is it that tragic if he adds another RB whose more comfortable in defending then in attacking?
Valencia is not 'shit' at attacking
So many posters under-estimate Valencia. Like I said before: Woe be tide if a supporter starts to see a few flaws in a player. That quickly becomes extreme hatred which is mentally blinding.
So you've picked arguably 3 of the top 10 greatest defenders of all time, and you're wondering why we don't see many like them? There are many absolutely fantastic defenders today, let's not cherry pick only the bad examples. I'm no Stones fan, but he is just 22. Let's not making sweeping judgements on a lad who's clearly far from his peak.
Like I said, you have somewhat valid points, I just believe that we should strive to have a player that can contribute box-to-box, like Shaw. Who's that player? If it's Fabinho, great. Football has evolved, to say otherwise is to allow sentiment and nostalgia to cloud judgement.
Badly worded as he's not strictly playing the attacker onside, but watch the video of the goal, Darmian is more to blame than Valencia for bad positioning. He's parallel to Valencia a split second before.Valencia ?