pauldyson1uk
Full Member
he was holding a dog turd.
he was holding a dog turd.
Cheers I will stop posting it when I'm no longer near the topDone
Cheers I will stop posting it when I'm no longer near the top
Lap | Verstappen | Perez |
---|---|---|
39 | GP: Ok Max that was track limits for Turn 23 again. We will like to target a 33.0. 33.0. | HB: Ok back to target now. So we're just covering Fernando he is doing 33.1 |
| GP: Max any more feedback on that issue from before? | PER: Sorry repeat |
| VER: Well it's still there | HB: Target lap time 33.0. Max targetting the same. For reference that is +0.8 on the dash. +0.8. |
| GP: Ok understood. Ok target 33.0. 33.0 | PER: I'm having a bit of a long brake pedal |
40 | GP: That's 33.0 | HB: Yeah copy we're having a look |
| GP: Max, confirm 33.0 | |
41 | GP: 33.0. 33.0 | HB: Target 32.6. +0.4 |
| | PER: Is Max doing the same? |
| | HB: Max's last lap is 32.6 |
| | PER: Then why did you tell me 33:0? |
| | HB: Just target plus four, jobs a good'un |
| | PER: We are pushing without a reason guys, not smart to do |
42 | | HB: Your lap 32.6. Max's lap 32.6 |
| | PER: Guys we don't really need this |
| | HB: 8 laps to go |
| | PER: Let's go. Let's go do 33.0 |
43 | GP: Max can you target 33:0 please? | PER: What is the gap? |
| | HB: Gap is 4.3 |
| | PER: So are we pushing now? |
| | HB: You're free to push. Free to push |
45 | GP: You have 5 laps remaining coming up. Gap is 5 | HB: 5 laps to go. Target +0.8. Gap 5.5 seconds |
| VER: What's the fastest lap? | |
| GP: We are not concerned about that at the moment Max | HB: Max's last lap 33.0 |
| VER: Yeah but I am | |
| GP: So 32.1, 32.1 | |
48 | | PER: What is the fastest lap at the moment? |
| | HB: You've got the fastest lap. That's a 32.1 |
CF | | PER: Did we get the fastest lap in the end or? |
| | HB: You were pipped on the last lap |
| | PER: Ah, great! Aha! |
Not the full transcript. Odd that they missed out Max being told he was free to push same as Checo. I wonder why…
Ted Kravitz said teams in pitlane are questioning the legality of RedBull DRS system as it gives them 20mph more speed than any other car when open.
Teams think something else is going on, maybe the floor also stalling or some other aero part.
Early days yet as they need to figure out how works before any team could in theory appeal to FIA or more likley copy the system for themselves.
I dont for one minute think their DRS is illegal, OK it may be faster, but I am sure they would have consulted the FIA during every stage of design and development.Ted Kravitz said teams in pitlane are questioning the legality of RedBull DRS system as it gives them 20mph more speed than any other car when open.
Teams think something else is going on, maybe the floor also stalling or some other aero part.
Early days yet as they need to figure out how works before any team could in theory appeal to FIA or more likley copy the system for themselves.
They have to be doing something different than others and found something though.I dont for one minute think their DRS is illegal, OK it may be faster, but I am sure they would have consulted the FIA during every stage of design and development.
Would the same not apply to the design and development of the floor, maybe they have just found a way for then both to work better the other have not.
No feck it they are cheating, throw then out
I agree and TBH fair play to them, upto others to catch up nowThey have to be doing something different than others and found something though.
It has emerged that some parts used in the wind tunnel (the scale models) were inaccurate and went beyond the necessary parameters.
These problems have not only affected the development of the W14, such as the delays we reported during the winter, but also in terms of correlation. Subsequently, some of those who worked in this area have been dismissed.
Due to dissatisfaction with the wind tunnel numbers for the W14, development at Mercedes has been ramped up in recent weeks. In addition to innovations that will concern aerodynamics, including the sidepods, as already mentioned by Mercedes, there will also be mechanical and, most significantly, cooling changes.
What will not change is the chassis, which will stay the same – i.e, excavated and designed to optimise the zeropods concept – and remain different from the conventional design used by Aston Martin, for example.
In this respect, a new chassis will only be introduced with the W15 2024, due to the budget cap.
Interesting article, though i disagree with the very last point made, that mercedes will retaun the zero sidepod design. Thats counter to everything we have heard recently that they are ditching it and copying RB like the rest of the grid bar ferrari and haas.Merc wind tunnel correlation affected by out-of-tolerance parts. Very disappointing if true, and relevant individuals have reportedly been dismissed.
https://www.formu1a.uno/en/mercedes-wind-tunnel-troubles-no-new-chassis-until-2024/
It has emerged that some parts used in the wind tunnel (the scale models) were inaccurate and went beyond the necessary parameters.Merc wind tunnel correlation affected by out-of-tolerance parts. Very disappointing if true, and relevant individuals have reportedly been dismissed.
https://www.formu1a.uno/en/mercedes-wind-tunnel-troubles-no-new-chassis-until-2024/
https://www.gptoday.com/details/vie...pen_boycott_driver_safetycar_after_interview/
Red Bull and Verstappen boycott driver safety-car after interview
A remarkable piece of news from Australia: Red Bull Racing and therefore Max Verstappen are boycotting this weekend's safety meetings involving the safety car driver. The reason is an interview Bernd Mayländer gave last week, according to the Swiss Blick. Article continues under ad Red Bull and Verstappen are outraged by Mayländer's remark against Auto, Motor und Sport. He said, "I walked through the hospitality with my helmet on and sat down behind the port first. I first had to clarify for myself what had just happened?" At least for Red Bull, this comment was enough to punish Mayländer.
such babies.
https://www.gptoday.com/details/vie...pen_boycott_driver_safetycar_after_interview/
Red Bull and Verstappen boycott driver safety-car after interview
A remarkable piece of news from Australia: Red Bull Racing and therefore Max Verstappen are boycotting this weekend's safety meetings involving the safety car driver. The reason is an interview Bernd Mayländer gave last week, according to the Swiss Blick. Article continues under ad Red Bull and Verstappen are outraged by Mayländer's remark against Auto, Motor und Sport. He said, "I walked through the hospitality with my helmet on and sat down behind the port first. I first had to clarify for myself what had just happened?" At least for Red Bull, this comment was enough to punish Mayländer.
I did wonder , click the link then click full story and you just get an error.You do realise that's a fake article being passed around by the really strange twitter LH cult.
That Stephanie person is seriously unhinged.
They make things up for themselves to then get pissed about. It's an endless cycle of madness.
no different to some of the rabid Max fans, lets be honest both sets of fans have their fair share of ,lets say extreme fans who will post anything to wind the other side up.Nothing more tragic than these Hamilbots with their 40k+ deranged tweets. It really is a cult.
El Plan
Nah there's clearly a big difference. Team LH is a cult of personality, a lot of them aren't even motorsport fans. Also there's a lot more of them than for any other driver.
It's ones like Stephanie who make F1 twitter such a meme for being a toxic wasteland. These are the sort who caused Latifi and Masi to have to hire extra security. Who send death and rape threats to Newey's wife and Piquet's daughter. Because they're so invested in a cult of personality they think it's all fair game.
Nah there's clearly a big difference. Team LH is a cult of personality, a lot of them aren't even motorsport fans. Also there's a lot more of them than for any other driver.
It's ones like Stephanie who make F1 twitter such a meme for being a toxic wasteland. These are the sort who caused Latifi and Masi to have to hire extra security. Who send death and rape threats to Newey's wife and Piquet's daughter. Because they're so invested in a cult of personality they think it's all fair game.
You do realise that's a fake article being passed around by the really strange twitter LH cult.
That Stephanie person is seriously unhinged.
They make things up for themselves to then get pissed about. It's an endless cycle of madness.
Come on, you have to try harder if you want to WUM. There are lunatics on both sides.
You do realise that's a fake article being passed around by the really strange twitter LH cult.
That Stephanie person is seriously unhinged.
They make things up for themselves to then get pissed about. It's an endless cycle of madness.
Is this article fake then?
https://www.auto-motor-und-sport.de/formel-1/bernd-maylaender-video-interview/
You've missed the point completely - no one is disputing what Maylander said at the time. Your challenge is to find a credible source for Max / RB boycotting the meeting with him this weekend.
That’s not the first time it’s happened to me.
Is this article fake then?
https://www.auto-motor-und-sport.de/formel-1/bernd-maylaender-video-interview/
https://www.gptoday.com/details/vie...pen_boycott_driver_safetycar_after_interview/
Red Bull and Verstappen boycott driver safety-car after interview
A remarkable piece of news from Australia: Red Bull Racing and therefore Max Verstappen are boycotting this weekend's safety meetings involving the safety car driver. The reason is an interview Bernd Mayländer gave last week, according to the Swiss Blick. Article continues under ad Red Bull and Verstappen are outraged by Mayländer's remark against Auto, Motor und Sport. He said, "I walked through the hospitality with my helmet on and sat down behind the port first. I first had to clarify for myself what had just happened?" At least for Red Bull, this comment was enough to punish Mayländer.
Just when I started having a bit of respect for Jos' little bitch.
I understand the source language so why would I care about what people think about whoever tweeted about it!? Possibly the part about Verstappen is made up, possibly not. I don't see any conclusive proof for either, and given past conduct i'm inclined to believe it.Uh, would recommend you read the thread a bit more carefully there mate