pauldyson1uk
Full Member
I did OK this week 15 pointsSo how did the predictions go for everyone?
I did OK this week 15 pointsSo how did the predictions go for everyone?
Mercedes have been more consistent, Ferrari have made some huge strategic errors this season.How come Mercs are 2nd in WCC? I thought Ferrari are 2nd best all year long.
McLaren fan, always nice to see.Pleased that McLaren are doing well, they have a car that’s in most other seasons would have won multiple races by now.
How come Mercs are 2nd in WCC? I thought Ferrari are 2nd best all year long.
What an absolutely appalling race from Perez. That second incident of his with Magnussen was a sign of a desperate man who knew he had to overtake but just couldn't do it. Terrible driving. And then he had the ignominy of having to retire twice! By the way, that seems like a big loophole in the rules there, allowing a car to come out and serve a pen so it doesn't roll over into the next race, even though you retired the car. That should not be allowed.
Max just being Max. Deciding to demolish the grid after the frustration of last week. Just complete domination. The Russell one was an odd one. Obviously, the one-stop call from him didn't work out, then you had the whole thing with him and Hamilton which was odd and tetchy. Clearly, Russell was still salty after that incident between them both earlier in the race where Hamilton forced him out wide (don't think it was a pen, btw).
I'd love to but I think you've got too much of a points cushion. I think me you and Hob should have guaranteed a podium finish unless we forget to do it one week (I'm that sad I set reminders especially if races are at weird times/ sprints )
I'm pleasantly surprised by my points this week, thanks Max, George and Lando for finishing where I put you. Up to 29th in the McLaren league. Also comprehensively beating my husband
I don't think anyone ever officially retires a car from a race, you either finish or you don't, so there are no rules against bringing the car into the garage to work on it and then sending it back out again. No team ever does that though because you go so far behind the rest of the grid there's no point.
Nah, 3 points is basically nothing. You win bt a point a week over me and you are there. Going to be tight and I always bottle these fantasy leagues near the end if I’m doing well
Yeah, sure, but you know what I'm saying. I don't like it, personally. Obviously they didn't do anything wrong by the looks of it, but still...
It going to be interesting to see how RedBull rebuild Perez's shattered confidence for next season. Hes a broken man. They will probably need him more next season to be a wing man for max. Especially if ferrari/mercedes/mclaren etc can actually challenge for wins in race pace.What an absolutely appalling race from Perez. That second incident of his with Magnussen was a sign of a desperate man who knew he had to overtake but just couldn't do it. Terrible driving. And then he had the ignominy of having to retire twice! By the way, that seems like a big loophole in the rules there, allowing a car to come out and serve a pen so it doesn't roll over into the next race, even though you retired the car. That should not be allowed.
Not really a team fan , more of a driver fan, but I have followed McLaren since Hunt, Lauda then there was the Prost and Senna seasons and of course Lewis's first WC.McLaren fan, always nice to see.
Haikkenen for me.Not really a team fan , more of a driver fan, but I have followed McLaren since Hunt, Lauda then there was the Prost and Senna seasons and of course Lewis's first WC.
They deserve to be at the top, they have produced some of the legends of F1.
yeap another cracking driver.Haikkenen for me.
I’ll never forget in F1 PS1 game which was the 1995 season that the mclaren choices were Mark Blundell and Mika Hakkinen. I just so happened to press right on their screen and Nigel Mansell appeared!yeap another cracking driver.
A vastly underrated driver, watch the documentary on Sky about him , it is brillant.I’ll never forget in F1 PS1 game which was the 1995 season that the mclaren choices were Mark Blundell and Mika Hakkinen. I just so happened to press right on their screen and Nigel Mansell appeared!
As a 6 year old I was delighted! Loved that game. Although driving as Coulthard in that Williams waswhat I did most.
It going to be interesting to see how RedBull rebuild Perez's shattered confidence for next season. Hes a broken man. They will probably need him more next season to be a wing man for max. Especially if ferrari/mercedes/mclaren etc can actually challenge for wins in race pace.
Maybe RedBull fans on here can answer this. Doesnt max owe Perez a GP win from last season?
If Perez can actually get to 2nd in a GP behind max. Would max move over and give perez a win? It would probably help his confidence.
Personally id like to see Perez dumped for next season and Lawson given the no2/apprentice/wing man role to learn from and support max. Unfortuntely Perez apparently has a iron tight contract till end of season.
So lawson best shot is 2nd seat at Williams. Unfortuntely he'd have to be released from RB to get that seat. Totto has been pushing for mick schmacher to get sargents seat but james vowles has said no to mick getting it.
"The car doesn't feel right", yeah Checo, it needs a new driver.
Me!Guess who forgot to make a prediction this week and has therefore rendered all predictions up to this point meaningless?
Ironic thing is that it's not the first time it's been done in F1 and it's quite common to do in the feeder series. FIA again trying to save face when it's allowed it for years and years.FIA will look to close the loophole that allowed Red Bull and Sergio Perez to serve a five-second time penalty at the Japanese Grand Prix.
Perez endured a miserable weekend at Suzuka and his race quickly unravelled on Sunday, first making contact with Lewis Hamilton on the opening lap before overtaking Fernando Alonso before the safety car line and picking up a five-second time penalty.
The Mexican driver then picked up another penalty when he dived down the inside of Kevin Magnussen into the hairpin, sending the Haas driver into a spin and ending any hopes of salvaging a points finish.
With Checo's car damaged again and the 33-year-old comfortably out of contention, Red Bull opted to retire the car, but Checo still had a five-second time penalty to serve.
Ordinarily, this would be converted to a grid penalty for the following race, but Red Bull instead opted to send the retired driver back out into the race to serve his penalty, before bringing him back into the garage for good.
O
FIA to change F1 rule straight away after Red Bull exploit loophole at Japanese GP (msn.com)
My friend sent this clip to me. What a beauty from both
Two of my favorite drivers in different eras outside of Ferrari drivers, I like aggressive drivers.
My friend sent this clip to me. What a beauty from both
Two of my favorite drivers in different eras outside of Ferrari drivers, I like aggressive drivers.
Perhaps. But the amount of forces and concentration required of the driver are arguably much greater today. Not only is the car way larger and has less visibility, Max' lap compared to the Senna one was also about 13 seconds (!!) faster. I'd say the challenges of driving either are different.https://reddit.com/r/formuladank/s/SU9kYCkoy0
https://reddit.com/r/formuladank/s/ZaupbjSQbi
Shows how easy modern F1 cars are to drive compared to their 80 versions. No comparision. Senna lap is in different league of impressive.
Martin BrundlePerhaps. But the amount of forces and concentration required of the driver are arguably much greater today. Not only is the car way larger and has less visibility, Max' lap compared to the Senna one was also about 13 seconds (!!) faster. I'd say the challenges of driving either are different.
Seems like quotes that dont say much of anything. So Brundle is saying modern cars are harder to drive but in a different way, and Warwick is saying something that would equally apply to putting Senna in a modern car. As i said, its kind of hard to really use these discussions re who is or isn't a better driver than another which what it often seems to come down to.Martin Brundle
The current cars are physically easier to drive [than those from previous eras] - but they're not easier to keep on track...
Derek Warwick
The cars I drove were more physical [than today's]. Could a Verstappen-type driver have gone quick straight away? I think he'd have struggled...
https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/...er-to-drive-than-those-from-previous-era.html
yes it is apples and oranges. which is why i see no value in the onboard comparison videos of different era.Seems like quotes that dont say much of anything. So Brundle is saying modern cars are harder to drive and Warwick is saying something that would equally apply to putting Senna in a modern car. As i said, its kind of hard to really use these discussions re who is or isn't a better driver than another which what it often seems to come down to. Take a Fangio era and Senna's car might be "easy" to drive. Or take a WWI fighter pilot and put them in a high performance WWII prop, etc. It's fun to have these discussions but in the end it's really apples and oranges.
What will you do with it?
get in the seat and get a mate to take a pic
So we've got one of Landos cars from this season at our work, could have it for quite a while apparently.
I've got a few different photos but didn't want to dox myself. Touched the rear wing, waiting on my fine.
And then quietly drive it home and park it behind some bushes until everybody forgot about it.get in the seat and get a mate to take a pic
get in the seat and get a mate to take a pic