Ahmer Baig
Full Member
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2017
- Messages
- 4,649
So who wants to bet that in how many laps will Max take the lead?
Not technically in the same corner.
"Look at us we suck at making engines"As long as F1 sticks to the ground effect era, racing in the rain will carry a risk, it's not just the tires throwing up spray now it's the floor as well, the spray guards they tried for the tires failed.
Also alpine can get fecked moaning about engine homologation, if that happens it well and truly ends the point of manufactures.
Exactly, Enzo would turn in his grave if he knew Ferrari was in a series like that."Look at us we suck at making engines"
Princess George being Princess George.
It is just down to bad luck that Spa has seen back to back tragedies. It's not that the corner has unique problems, it's just cars spinning, colliding and re-entering the track in no visibility, which could happen anywhere in heavy rain. Just look at Suzuka last year.
It's an aero outwash/spray problem with F1/2/3 cars nothing track specific.
Yeah teams have no idea if their setup is any good. Especially the likes of Red Bull who brought a big update package last race and couldn't get the balance right, Mercedes with their new sidepods, floor and wing. It's all going to be based on simulator data I guess.one wet FP before a wet qualifying will mix things up a lot.
what a load of bullshit. Used to be times in the FPs if qually couldnt be run. People pay money to go see F1. Make them go out. Get data as a minimum. Just look at the order right now. Zero chance of that being the order at end of FP if FP decided the grid if qually couldnt be run. Fecking FIA.
By lap 5. Needs a few laps to get tyres up to temps and no DRS for first 2 laps.So who wants to bet that in how many laps will Max take the lead?
Probably due to the sprint format and teams not risking it in these conditions.what a load of bullshit. Used to be times in the FPs if qually couldnt be run.
If it was a dry FP1 then yeah they should , but a FP1 this wetwhat a load of bullshit. Used to be times in the FPs if qually couldnt be run.
It would have made sunday so much more interesting as those brave enough to go out would have been rewarded with a better grid slot. A mixed up grid would have been better for sunday. Just dont go racing on sunday if it rains and give max the win now. Sigh.Probably due to the sprint format and teams not risking it in these conditions.
Yep F1 isnt what it used to be.They wont even start Q1 if it stays like this.
They should we have all seen races done in heavy rain.
well you say that. but if it carries on raining, them second standing in the championship is polea FP where I learned nothing. A stab in the dark in the fantasy predictions with this one. Let's see how wrong I got it this time
No dont pick Max, he wont be on pole. He has his grid drop even if Qualifying does not run .So they're saying if qualifying is cancelled they will use the current order of the drivers championship?!
So I could pick Max?!
Really don't know who to pick there's 3 I'm alternating between for pole if Max is being excluded from the equation. But the above declaration may bring him back into play...
Alpine are a mess.Szafnauer leaving Alpine after Belgian GP
Breaking news from Alpine and the French team has confirmed team principal Otmar Szafnauer will be leaving after this weekend's Belgian GP.
Sporting director Alan Permane will also be leaving by mutual agreement, while as reported earlier, Pat Fry is leaving Alpine to take up a role at Williams.
Alpine have named Bruno Famin, VP Alpine Motorsports, as interim team principal from the Dutch GP onwards.
No dont pick Max, he wont be on pole. He has his grid drop even if Qualifying does not run .
Superbru has said pole is decided after any grid pens, so who ever finishes second if qualiy is run will be pole
I plumped for Norris on Pole.Ooh thank you very good point of course he will have his penalty
I'm narrowed down to 3. One should be the easy pick but is somewhat unreliable and has fecked my fantasy many a time. There's one I'm leaning towards but...
I'd be disappointed if I had paid to watch the qualifying, isn't there some room for manoeuvre around times e.g. start earlier/later - check the radar unless it's constant rain.
Or use the sprint qualifying slot for the official qualifying then either use results from the last race or the same grid order for the sprint
I plumped for Norris on Pole.
I would be mad if I did also, but it was forecast, qualifying looks in major doubt if it does not ease up.
Lewis was my other choice, I might change yet, agree with Perez, he was also a choice.We are in the same boat as I've gone for him too, gut feel... My other hunch is Perez as he'd get it if they don't run as he's 2nd, but if they do qualify normally I don't trust him, he's messed up my fantasy way too much this year
Lewis was my other choice, I might change yet, agree with Perez, he was also a choice.
FP1 times are not worth looking at, Lewis is one of the best wet drivers, but that McLaren is just so god at the moment.Those are the 3 I'm toying with, Lewis because he's good in the rain but his free practice time was poor, Perez is technically the safe bet but isn't because he's unreliable, or Lando as the wildcard, just got a hunch about him...
Still put Max to win!
Apologies to the French and Italian folks on here but every time you hear about Alpine and Ferrari you can't help but feel like a lot of the stereotypes about how they run a business are confirmed.Alpine are a mess.
Princess George being Princess George.
It is just down to bad luck that Spa has seen back to back tragedies. It's not that the corner has unique problems, it's just cars spinning, colliding and re-entering the track in no visibility, which could happen anywhere in heavy rain. Just look at Suzuka last year.
It's an aero outwash/spray problem with F1/2/3 cars nothing track specific.