pauldyson1uk
Full Member
They do all have it, Lando would have had DRS on Max when Max passed himHow's it fair one does and one doesn't have it?
They do all have it, Lando would have had DRS on Max when Max passed himHow's it fair one does and one doesn't have it?
How's it fair one does and one doesn't have it?
How's it fair one does and one doesn't have it?
But why doesn't the car ahead, defending his position have it? Is it to allow for more passing which they think makes it more entertaining l?They do all have it, Lando would have had DRS on Max when Max passed him
Thank you.It’s to aid the person overtaking because it can be so difficult with how the air moves off the car in front and onto the car behind (F1 cars rely on the air for the downforce). You’ll hear comments around dirty air, for example Russell is faster than Leclerc but can’t get past even with DRS.
A solution would be to only race on tracks that are wide enough, or make the cars smaller.Maybe the solution would be to only have DRS at hard to overtake tracks? The sprint last week was fantastic and there was no DRS until the end was there?
The car in front does not have because he is in front, it was brought in to promote more overtakes and exciting racing, up to a point it does.But why doesn't the car ahead, defending his position have it? Is it to allow for more passing which they think makes it more entertaining l?
A solution would be to only race on tracks that are wide enough, or make the cars smaller.
DRS was introduced to make it more entertaining for audiences with more overtakings. But it's not entertaining to watch someone sail past someone who doesn't even put up a fight because one has a booster and the other doesn't. From an audience perspective that's hugely unsatisfying. And you've actually gotten even fewer genuine overtakings that require skill and risk-taking because there's no simply no point when you can just as well wait until the next DRS straight. It was a good idea in theory but it's not working at all in terms of entertainment.
But why doesn't the car ahead, defending his position have it? Is it to allow for more passing which they think makes it more entertaining l?
I imagine the trailing car just waits for drs to be the faster car instead of trying to overtake with good driving on corners and such like?That's the reasoning yeah. The previous generation of cars prior to last year were really bad at creating "dirty air" which made it difficult for the cars to follow and overtake. DRS was a way around that, but with this generation of cars following isn't so bad. DRS makes overtaking too easy now in my opinion and you rarely get overtakes outside of using DRS on the straights.
Leclerc comes in on mediums before Russel does on softs
That’s exactly what I was thinking, looks like Ferrari have shit the bed by going on hards, if they got a bit more out of the mediums they could easily jumped on the softs.I think I'd risk the softs. George has them looking good. And you'll be on lighter fuel load too..
They never used to be.Mercedes are so shit at pit stops
I imagine the trailing car just waits for drs to be the faster car instead of trying to overtake with good driving on corners and such like?
Boring race tbf.
Boring race tbf.
To the untrained eye, it would seem they've made it more "boring" than exciting. I used to love the overtaking on corners, getting close to contact, the great driving being the reason for overtakes when I watched years ago.Exactly , yes. the speed advantage makes it a no-brainer for the driver to go for the overtakes at the end of the straights rather than riskier ones on corners.