sun_tzu
The Art of Bore
Are alpine the only people in f1 not to have seen piastris tweet as they still have this as their top tweet
Are alpine the only people in f1 not to have seen piastris tweet as they still have this as their top tweet
We go again
We go again
Nope, just Albon staying for 2023. Anti-climax.Piastri announcement for Williams?
Nope, just Albon staying for 2023. Anti-climax.
Well, it is the F1 thread, and this is one of the biggest topics in F1 for the last decade, at least.I'm at a loss whether to reply seriously or to post something sarcastic and drag this thread down further.
It’s so actually true though, that’s the sad thing.
https://www.grandprix247.com/2022/08/04/wolff-porpoising-can-lead-to-brain-damage/
“The FIA has commissioned medical work on the porpoising,” he revealed. “The summary of the doctors is that frequency of 1-2Hz, sustained over a few minutes, can lead to brain damage. We have 6-7Hz over several hours."
Can anyone explain me why Alonso and Piastri made this decision to leave Alpine? Have they been favouring Ocon?
Typical Wolff. As if anybody is questioning whether porpoising is bad for the drivers. That's so obvious. But of course Wolff jumps to the conclusion that the FIA need to do something about it. Well actually, maybe they should. Maybe they should just measure the amount of porpoising for each car and disqualify the ones that go over the limit instead of implementing rules that would only benefit the team that is suffering from porpoising the most.https://www.grandprix247.com/2022/08/04/wolff-porpoising-can-lead-to-brain-damage/
“The FIA has commissioned medical work on the porpoising,” he revealed. “The summary of the doctors is that frequency of 1-2Hz, sustained over a few minutes, can lead to brain damage. We have 6-7Hz over several hours."
Typical Wolff. As if anybody is questioning whether porpoising is bad for the drivers. That's so obvious. But of course Wolff jumps to the conclusion that the FIA need to do something about it. Well actually, maybe they should. Maybe they should just measure the amount of porpoising for each car and disqualify the ones that go over the limit instead of implementing rules that would only benefit the team that is suffering from porpoising the most.
Alonso wanted a longer contract than what Alpine offered, Alpine wanted to only give him a short contract to free up a future seat for Piastri. Why Piastri decided to leave I'm unsure, maybe not happy with being on the side lines for the past year, maybe offered more money by another team?
sure - though that would probably hurt their product / tv viewing figures and therefore might be a sub optimal solution... probably better to just stick everybody behind a safety car to reduce the risks and give the title to max (again )Typical Wolff. As if anybody is questioning whether porpoising is bad for the drivers. That's so obvious. But of course Wolff jumps to the conclusion that the FIA need to do something about it. Well actually, maybe they should. Maybe they should just measure the amount of porpoising for each car and disqualify the ones that go over the limit instead of implementing rules that would only benefit the team that is suffering from porpoising the most.
Alpine did an Ole.Can anyone explain me why Alonso and Piastri made this decision to leave Alpine? Have they been favouring Ocon?
Because Alpine have no real desire to get to the top of F1 and are happy to tread water. Ask yourself, why have both riccardo and Alonso walked away? Why does a rookie such as piastri not want to drive for them?Can anyone explain me why Alonso and Piastri made this decision to leave Alpine? Have they been favouring Ocon?
Alpine did an Ole.
3 good drivers for 2 seats, couldn't make the hard decision so tried to delay it until they made their own choices.
Piastri wanted a seat last season but Alpine couldn't make it happen. This year they've struggled to find him a seat elsewhere assuming Ocon + Alonso were continuing.
meanwhile Alonso wanted a longer contract, but Alpine refused because of his age. Alonso decided to take a long term offer at AM.
Now Alpine have a space they've said "oh hey Piastri you can drive for us now", but he's like erm... got a deal elsewhere already lads. Cheers though!
They've made a right mess of it basically.
Both theses messages, sum it up perfect.Alonso wanted a longer contract than what Alpine offered, Alpine wanted to only give him a short contract to free up a future seat for Piastri. Why Piastri decided to leave I'm unsure, maybe not happy with being on the side lines for the past year, maybe offered more money by another team?
Those 2 options are not mutually exclusive. They could do both.Typical Wolff. As if anybody is questioning whether porpoising is bad for the drivers. That's so obvious. But of course Wolff jumps to the conclusion that the FIA need to do something about it. Well actually, maybe they should. Maybe they should just measure the amount of porpoising for each car and disqualify the ones that go over the limit instead of implementing rules that would only benefit the team that is suffering from porpoising the most.
Well yeah. Can't believe they needed doctors to work that out.https://www.grandprix247.com/2022/08/04/wolff-porpoising-can-lead-to-brain-damage/
“The FIA has commissioned medical work on the porpoising,” he revealed. “The summary of the doctors is that frequency of 1-2Hz, sustained over a few minutes, can lead to brain damage. We have 6-7Hz over several hours."
Confirmed ?Mclaren are replacing Ricciardo with Piastri.