Crazy
Whats the reason for this week test doesnt have live TV coverage? Anyone knows?
The undercut on the Red Bull is insane.
i can expect a lot of complaints about the red bull coming up
That's usually the case unfortunately.These pics just makes it feel more and more likely that one team will have got it right and they'll end up being miles ahead of the rest. I really hope I'm wrong but the chances of them having similar performance feels a lot slimmer when the cars are this different, although it's not impossible obviously. Wouldn't surprise me if we'll see more pronounced differences between the cars depending on what type of track it is than we have before as well.
this is true.only if it’s faster.
There is literally zero racing right now and the FIA made a massive announcement and change regarding this only last week. Its also a massive talking point for the sport.Move on man it’s a sport you are stuck in an endless loop for 3 months, You are constantly regurgitating the same info over and over again, it’s not going to change what happened.
Whats the reason for this week test doesnt have live TV coverage? Anyone knows?
Fair points but sweet FA to do with a mistake Hamilton didn't make. If we want to be fair we'd rely on the cars, team and driving and not a mistake brought about by undue influence.I'd say he lost the title due to his own poor performances in the first half of the season than anything else. Huge mistake at Imola but awful red flag rules meant he could still finish second. Huge error in Baku which cost him 25 points after fluking Max's tyre blow out. Didn't even turn up to Monaco. Big mistake in Silverstone and was fortunate to avoid damage and a fair penalty. Starting solo on the grid with the wrong tyres in Hungary was partly on him as well.
Max by comparison had a faultless season until the dirty driving in Brazil and the qualy mistake. Definitely started getting to him in the last 4-5 races how much faster the Merc had become with its rocket engine, and the mistakes and naughty driving crept in.
Here's the current leaderboard for today according to Autosport.
- Leclerc, Ferrari, 1m20.165s, C3
- Norris, McLaren, 1m20.474s, C3
- Russell, Mercedes, 1m20.784s, C3
- Vettel, Aston Martin, 1m21.276s, C3
- Tsunoda, AlphaTauri, 1m21.638s, C3
- Verstappen, Red Bull, 1m22.246s, C2
- Alonso, Alpine, 1m23.317s, C3
- Latifi, Williams, 1m23.379s, C3
- Mazepin, Haas, 1m24.505s, C2
- Kubica, Alfa Romeo, 1m25.909s, C3
I think everybody is hoping to get a clue about which teams interpreted the new rules best.why people are even bothering to look at test times in the first day come on guys...
why people are even bothering to look at test times in the first day come on guys...
Don't know why this is though, if the teams only have one car each or if they're doing it to limit the amount of cars on track.
why people are even bothering to look at test times in the first day come on guys...
why people are even bothering to look at test times in the first day come on guys...
It's to reduce running costs during testing, and that there's an even playing field. (eg. teams with bigger budgets running two cars because they can afford to).
Move on man it’s a sport you are stuck in an endless loop for 3 months, You are constantly regurgitating the same info over and over again, it’s not going to change what happened.
Oh no doubt, but we won't know this until first practice in Bahrain.I think everybody is hoping to get a clue about which teams interpreted the new rules best.
There'll always be an asterisk beside the 2021 Championship unfortunately.
No they didnt. You just made that up.People tried to say the same about 1990, 1994 and 2008 but I don’t think Senna, Schumacher and Hamilton gave a damn.
You'll have to remind me why racing incidents as the first part of my comment that you haven't addressed are in any way compared to a decision made by a Race Director under duress from a team manager?People tried to say the same about 1990, 1994 and 2008 but I don’t think Senna, Schumacher and Hamilton gave a damn.
I can't help but feel you wanted to ignore this which may be why you selectively quoted my comment?Fair points but sweet FA to do with a mistake Hamilton didn't make. If we want to be fair we'd rely on the cars, team and driving and not a mistake brought about by undue influence.
As my reply earlier in response to your earlier comment stated, the mistake was not the driver's (Hamilton), the mistake came from the Race Director and the undue influence brought upon by Horner.Because racing incidents that aren't governed correctly are exactly the same as a racing incident that wasn't governed correctly...?
Keep up with him in the points obviously.
Been watching f1 for 40 years sonny. Racing incidents happen that decide championships, they are controversial at the time but there has never been a f1 championship decided by a race director making up his own rules on the last lap of the last race of the season.You’re presumably just ignorant of anything that happened in F1 before 2014.
Senna and Schumacher blatantly cheated to win those titles and sent Prost fans and the brits into total meltdown respectively. Hamilton in 08 is obviously just a big chunk of good luck but the Brazilians were just as salty. Educate yourself.
Obviously I can't help you from your dim view however let's just put this to rights. You began by blaming Hamilton for his poor driving and mistakes, my response was that losing the title in the last race was not a driving mistake from Hamilton, rather a mistake made out of his or his team's hands. I have to admit I find it extremely tiresome when a poster can't admit the most basic of errors made by themselves.All 3 were a failure of governance over incidents that happened in races that defined where the title ended up. So yeah, they are obviously comparable. Despite not being the same sort of incident.
But the point wasn't about what caused the wielding of the asterisks, the point was that these drivers dont give a shit about how F1 fans interpret their championships. That's why I mention 2008 regarding Brazil F1 fans. Or I could also have included Rosberg given the clamour by a lot of Hamilton fans to put an asterisk on his title.
51 years myself although I'll admit that the days we used to camp at Silverstone and sneak under the wire fence with my brother and cousins and then meet up with the paying grown ups was spent as a nine and ten year old begging goodies from stalls and teams doing PR.Been watching f1 for 40 years sonny. Racing incidents happen that decide championships, they are controversial at the time but there has never been a f1 championship decided by a race director making up his own rules on the last lap of the last race of the season.
Go educate yourself.
I can't fathom why people who repeatedly say they are so bored of a discussion go to such extraordinary lengths to be part of it
Thank feck Masi is gone, it's the ultimate piece of evidence that everyone involved in F1 was on the same page about what happened in Abu Dhabi, not even RB tried to defend him in any meaningful way, cause, well, they know too. History will tell what 2021 is remembered for, but I have a feeling some will be very disappointed
Driver | Team | Time | Tyres | Laps |
---|---|---|---|---|
1) Lando Norris | McLaren | 1:19.951 | C4 (soft) | 87 |
2) Charles Leclerc | Ferrari | 1:20.165 | C3 (medium) | 80 |
3) Carlos Sainz | Ferrari | 1:20.416 | C3 | 57 |
4) George Russell | Mercedes | 1:20.784 | C3 | 77 |
5) Lewis Hamilton | Mercedes | 1:20.929 | C3 | 50 |
6) Sebastian Vettel | Aston Martin | 1:21.276 | C3 | 52 |
7) Yuki Tsunoda | AlphaTauri | 1:21.638 | C3 | 105 |
8) Fernando Alonso | Alpine | 1:21.746 | C2 (hard) | 127 |
9) Max Verstappen | Red Bull | 1:22.246 | C2 | 147 |
10) Valtteri Bottas | Alfa Romeo | 1:22.572 | C3 | 23 |
11) Alex Albon | Williams | 1:23.379 | C3 | 66 |
12) Mick Schumacher | Haas | 1:22.962 | C3 | 23 |
13) Lance Stroll | Aston Martin | 1:23.327 | C2 | 50 |
14) Nicholas Latifi | Williams | 1:23.379 | C3 | 66 |
15) Nikita Mazepin | Haas | 1:24.505 | C2 | 20 |
16) Robert Kubica | Alfa Romeo | 1:25.909 | C3 | 9 |
He didn't though, this is just flat out wrong and shifting the blame. He didn't lose anything going in to the final race. Hamilton went into the final race level on points due to consistently terrible decisions by his team, terrific team strategy by Red bull, amazing driving by Verstappen, nothing more, nothing less. The reason he lost the title is because of the feck up by the race director. He did everything in that race to win the title, Verstappen started the race in p1 on faster tyres and wasn't able to do anything with that, Hamilton built a gigantic lead that only got eroded thanks to Perez parking the bus through fantastic driving, he then built up a huge lead again and only lost because of the race director. That's literally the only reason he lost the title. Everything else you mentioned has nothing to do with him losing the title, and only has anything to do with setting us up with an exciting potential finish going into the last race on level points. Verstappen did literally nothing in that last race to deserve the win and was outclassed by Lewis the entire race.
The only reason he won that race is because Perez did absolute work for him, and then when he lost that lead again his team made the strategy call to pit under the SC which if the race director adhered to the rules, would have lost them the race and been looked back on as a poor tactical decision by Red Bull but because the director fecked up, ended up working out beautifully for them.
It's really not.. That's like if we were 1-0 up and we got a trash penalty in the 95th minute despite there being only 1 minute of extra time and then saying 'we lost it in the 1st half when we didn't score more goals' like no bro, we very clearly lost it to the trash penalty that should never have happened. After all was said and done including all the mistakes you say lost it, he was still winning. So they quite clearly did not lose it for him because he was about to win despite it. The loss is solely down to that decision and nothing else. Saying otherwise is just shifting the blame from Masi where it should be, to Hamilton bizarrely for no reason. These people are on a different planet because if the rules were followed then he was quite clearly going to win despite the things they say lost it for him. Some weird fetish to use revisionism to shift the blame because as a Verstappen fan they can't bring themselves to admit that his win was gifted to him because despite all his good driving, he still wasn't good enough otherwise. Despite his 'flawless season' he was still going to lose the title. Despite his amazing out of this world never been seen before once in a lifetime performance of a season he still immediately lost the lead with faster tires from pole position. He still had to have his team mate destroy a massive lead for him so he stood a chance in the race only for him to give it up again. He still failed to capitalise on fresh tires to erode a 17 second deficit down to only 11, and he still would have lost the race despite throwing everything at Hamilton had Masi not reinvented the rule book. They went into the race level, and he did nothing himself that warranted winning that race and therefore the title. His team threw the kitchen sink against Lewis in that race and it still wasn't good enough until the race director reinvented the rules. There isn't a single Max fan on this forum who if the positions were reversed would say 'ah yeah Max lost it 6 months earlier when he made a mistake' that's just silly.
I would say this is a fair assessment of Lewis' season.
The sole grid start was farcical, Hungary was his fault. Monaco is not that good a race for him.
Silverstone, I thought the penalty was about right.
Lewis and Max both had chance to have the season wrapped up before the farce of Abu Dhabi.