- Joined
- Jul 21, 2015
- Messages
- 38,565
- Supports
- Arsenal
It is really happening!
Yeah it would. I didn't go today though I couldn't see the point. Once the snow stopped it was going to rain for most of the day. It's raining heavily now.Would have been nice to see the cars under the snow
apparently , it is Williams and Ferrari ( unconfirmed )Today's a snow/wash-out, and unfortunately an unnamed team/teams have blocked the idea of having an extra day when there's better weather next week.
Proposal was supposedly for Monday (basically have a five-day second test). I've heard Merc and FI also rumoured, could easily believe the former given they get so much running done anyway.apparently , it is Williams and Ferrari ( unconfirmed )
But Williams do have the track booked for Friday !
Where 'bouts?Anyone else read Smedley's comments? Supposedly McLaren and FI looking a bit shit.
Cheers. *Checks testing* yup, another shitbox for McLaren. Alonso no doubt off this year, all is forgiven Honda.
Honda wanted a bit longer engine fearing there might be reliability issues but Mclaren said no so they had to make the engine shorter. I'm betting they had no say in anything. They were probably just told to make the engine small enough to fit in the back. Zero compromises from their side. Size zero and all that crap...
Alonso the whiner, Boulier the incompetent and Brown, the guy who owns every motorsport media outlet feeding us with Mclaren crap on daily basis. How can anyone root for that bunch..
No it's this year's chassis, it's just getting a "significant upgrade" for the first race. But others will obviously be upgrading for then as well. And, yet again, having issues nearly every day of testing means they'll be turning up to the first race vastly under-prepared, not totally understanding the car and possibly without having completed a race sim.Didn't McLaren say they are using the chassis from last year for testing and will update the whole package in the first race? I wonder if the delay in deciding on Renault did actually impact timescales and why they haven't been able to rectify the problem since the first test when surely they would've realised the problem. It would be massive shame if Alonso isn't in a competitive car yet again.
The jury is still out on Honda, how do we not know they are running the engine in a low spec mode to ensure they get mileage... I really hope they get on top of the performance and give Red Bull an option if Renault don't deliver on performance. Anything to have some competitive racing!
Ricciardo and Red Bull look very fast. Let's see if they are reliable as well.Ricciardo posts fastest time of testing so far; Hamilton just behind; McLaren breaks down for fourth time; Raikkonen back in Ferrari in afternoon after feeling unwell.
Timesheet (2:30pm):
1) Ricciardo, Red Bull, 107 laps, Hypersoft tyres - 1:18.047;
2) Hamilton, Mercedes, 90 laps, Ultrasoft tyres - 1:18.400;
3) Bottas, Mercedes, 24 laps, Hypersoft tyres - 1:18.658;
4) Vettel, Ferrari, 66 laps, Soft tyres, 1:19.541;
5) Alonso, McLaren, 47 laps, Hypersoft tyres - 1:19.856;
6) Sainz, Renault, 88 laps, Medium tyres - 1:20.042;
7) Grosjean, Haas, 64 laps, Soft tyres - 1:20.237;
8) Stroll, Williams, 63 laps, Soft tyres - 1:20.349;
9) Hulkenberg, Renault, 26 laps, Soft tyres - 1:20.758;
10) Ocon, Force India, 78 laps, Soft tyres, 1:20.805;
11) Hartley, Toro Rosso, 65 laps, Soft tyres - 1:20.834;
12) Leclerc, Sauber, 99 laps, Soft tyres - 1:20.918;
13) Sirotkin, Williams, 38 laps, Soft tyres - 1:24.162.
No, Merc's at the top, then Ferrari, then Renault a way back, then Honda picking up the rear. In 2017, anyway.I have followed F1 on and off for year but I have a dumb question. Do all cars have the same engines in terms of power and torque etc?
No, Merc's at the top, then Ferrari, then Renault a way back, then Honda picking up the rear. In 2017, anyway.
@gaucho_10 what's your beef with Alonso?
Goes back longer than that, even with Merc and Newey - there's 2006 where the new V8 kept detonating during testing and they had to run an old car as a mule, then the disaster of the 2003 car which never even managed to race because Newey had gone too far with the packaging, and 2004 needed a b-spec midway through the year to become decent. 2012 was the last time when it went pretty well in testing but still too unreliable over the season.McLaren have a knack for messing up testing. There was 2009 where they lacked so much downforce with their package for the new regulations that they ran with a 2008 rear wing just so they could get some decent running in. There was 2011 when they turned up with the octopus diffuser where the exhaust was melting the floor and they couldn't run in testing for longer than a few laps. And of course there's been the last 3 seasons with Honda.
Not won a constructors since Hakkinen, Hamilton their only WDC since then. I think their demise started when they lost Newey and was compounded further by losing the Mercedes engine. Imagine if they kept Newey, Merc and Hamilton .
Come on, who among us has never accidentally installed suspension upside down?Can't beat 2013 when Button blitzed the field on the first day of testing only for Whitmarsh to later reveal they accidentally ran an illegal ride height.