What this guy said:
To be fair it is very hard to tell in this thread. I'm still half expecting the Britex movement to leap out from behind a bush shouting "surprise" because its all been a joke.
What this guy said:
I would cite these three as examples of what i would consider to have crossed a line
Free accession other European countries is another reason why I'm so excited I've just become a citizen. You bastards want to take that from me before I've had a chance to enjoy it.
What's hilarious - and when I say hilarious, I mean down right fecking frightening considering the amount of turmoil the whole episode will bring - is that when we vote to leave and we're slowly left behind over the next few decades, we'll probably adopt the Euro upon the inevitable rejoin.
That's nonsense. Even if our economy is damaged we won't be significantly left behind and we certainly won't consider joining the euro. It would be suicide to do so.
I would have to marry my girlfriend!To an EU country? I wonder how that will go with us not in the EU ourselves.
I can't understand Remain at all. For me, the decision is between Democracy or not. If you vote remain you're choosing to become a member of the European super state where un-elected, unaccountable bureaucrats create laws and policies people have no control over.
The EU wants a European army and a European treasury. It's likely Britain will be forced, eventually, to adopt the Euro.
No one answered this (especially the leave voters who are big on this topic) for me.Why EU ultimately becoming a state (like US) is a bad thing? And if that happens, how would be better for UK to not be part of the most powerful state in the world, who would also be in their doorstep and with whom UK would do most of the trade anyway?
I think you should do a bit more reading on how the EU & UK lawmaking process actually works.I can't understand Remain at all. For me, the decision is between Democracy or not. If you vote remain you're choosing to become a member of the European super state where un-elected, unaccountable bureaucrats create laws and policies people have no control over.
The EU wants a European army and a European treasury. It's likely Britain will be forced, eventually, to adopt the Euro.
Of course you will. You will be joining both euro and Schengen when you will ask to get in EU a few years from now. Because any other scenario won't be accepted by EU, and if you will be asking to join EU (which you will as soon as UK realize that being xenophobic doesn't solve any problem) then EU will have the upper hand in the negotiations.That's nonsense. Even if our economy is damaged we won't be significantly left behind and we certainly won't consider joining the euro. It would be suicide to do so.
Ah the Trump phenomenonTo be fair it is very hard to tell in this thread. I'm still half expecting the Britex movement to leap out from behind a bush shouting "surprise" because its all been a joke.
Complete political and fiscal union would be a hard sell.Why EU ultimately becoming a state (like US) is a bad thing? And if that happens, how would be better for UK to not be part of the most powerful state in the world, who would also be in their doorstep and with whom UK would do most of the trade anyway?
Wishful thinking IMO. The finance market will suffer a lot immediately. London's stock exchange is still the biggest one in Europe, and all yankee companies do the main business there. With UK out of EU and so different laws, they will reallocate their European headquarters to Dublin or Frankfurt.Right now Europe is in a crisis. That won't be the case in 15-20 years time. These things are cyclical and the general trend is that after each decade EU prosperity grows. When we leave, we won't be significantly left behind at first. In fact I don't even think we'll notice.
However, over time the gap will slowly get bigger and bigger, unless the EU collapses (which I doubt it will). And when Britain is faced with poorer trade deals, I can envisage a future government seeking to rejoin. We probably won't adopt the Euro, however as all new members have to there will likely be a hench negotiation around it.
Unless we become a super prosperous island nation and start trading with the world and building a surplus, build a hundreds of thousands of affordable houses that this country desperately needs and significantly invest in public healthcare and education. Just can't see that happening, being led by the super conservative brexiteers.
If US and China can do it...Complete political and fiscal union would be a hard sell.
Perhaps this is worthy of a separate thread.
I would cite these three as examples of what i would consider to have crossed a line:
1) We elect our members of the European Parliament.I can't understand Remain at all. For me, the decision is between Democracy or not. If you vote remain you're choosing to become a member of the European super state where un-elected, unaccountable bureaucrats create laws and policies people have no control over.
If US and China can do it...
I actually think that it is inevitable that it is going to happen. But then I think that it is a good thing.
I'm intrigued whether any Brit on here actually agrees with this and thinks we'll join the euro? And that it would be of benefit?
I'll be suprised if one person does.
I think farrage may have a heart attack if we did - would that constitute a good reason? (my heart says no but my head says sign us up)I'm intrigued whether any Brit on here actually agrees with this and thinks we'll join the euro? And that it would be of benefit?
I'll be suprised if one person does.
I can't understand Remain at all. For me, the decision is between Democracy or not. If you vote remain you're choosing to become a member of the European super state where un-elected, unaccountable bureaucrats create laws and policies people have no control over.
The EU wants a European army and a European treasury. It's likely Britain will be forced, eventually, to adopt the Euro.
Neither Leave or Remain want that. Like most of Europe, we'd like to maintain our sovereignty. The EU provides us access and a framework to trade easily anyway, so as things stand we get the best of both worlds.Why EU ultimately becoming a state (like US) is a bad thing? And if that happens, how would be better for UK to not be part of the most powerful state in the world, who would also be in their doorstep and with whom UK would do most of the trade anyway?
I don't think its inevitable and I don't see many extra benefits.I'm intrigued whether any Brit on here actually agrees with this and thinks we'll join the euro? And that it would be of benefit?
I'll be suprised if one person does.
I can't understand Remain at all. For me, the decision is between Democracy or not. If you vote remain you're choosing to become a member of the European super state where un-elected, unaccountable bureaucrats create laws and policies people have no control over.
The EU wants a European army and a European treasury. It's likely Britain will be forced, eventually, to adopt the Euro.
I'm intrigued whether any Brit on here actually agrees with this and thinks we'll join the euro? And that it would be of benefit?
I'll be suprised if one person does.
I'm intrigued whether any Brit on here actually agrees with this and thinks we'll join the euro? And that it would be of benefit?
I'll be suprised if one person does.
You sound like someone that has swallowed a Leave leaflet hook, line and sinker.I can't understand Remain at all. For me, the decision is between Democracy or not. If you vote remain you're choosing to become a member of the European super state where un-elected, unaccountable bureaucrats create laws and policies people have no control over.
The EU wants a European army and a European treasury. It's likely Britain will be forced, eventually, to adopt the Euro.
I can just imagine how unpopular Dutch/German etc taxes being spent in Greece would be. Likewise how happy the British would be to have a German or French president..If US and China can do it...
I actually think that it is inevitable that it is going to happen. But then I think that it is a good thing.
The manner in which Brussels and Berlin handled the bailout and resultant debt crises made things worse for the most vulnerable Greeks, and they could not have been aware of such, The country should have been allowed to leave the Euro and recover, but the credibility of the Eurozone was not thought up to the test. Millions have suffered as a result.
The migrant crisis goes well beyond Iraq and Syria, it includes the EU's wretched treaty with Turkey and the instability surrounding Libya. Policy formed in Brussels will have been responsible for hardship, abuse, injury and death. Did you not see MSF's statement on the matter last week?
The Lisbon Treaty has established the sway of QMV, as well as such wasteful endeavours as the European External Affairs Service (this latter already costing 1bn pa). The EAW is an infringement of a Briton's basic rights as criticised by Liberty. Judiciaries of lesser competency can extradite British citizens, with high profile cases where innocents have been kept in jail for many months.
Intelligence cooperation would occur irrespective of the European Union, as out ties with America testify to.
The EU already has an impact on VAT, an area which they hope to expand later this year IIRC. When Christine Lagarde was finance minister, she was a committed supporter of tax harmonisation, it's not a new thing.
I suppose that was to illustrate how i think European cooperation should have evolved over the years. Rather than courts, EU Commissioners and a flawed currency union; it should have been consumer protections, science (ESA, medical advances e.t.c.) and the environment.
I would cite these three as examples of what i would consider to have crossed a line:
Now i'll freely admit that i have been tad acerbic at times and sarcastic at others, but rarely without provocation. Related to which, i thought this to be one of the most apt replies during the debate yesterday:
Indeed. As it was I struggled to find someone to vote for last year, a win for Remain would could mean i fail to vote for the first time. Pretty much every party leader for 2020 would fall into one of two categories: complicit in deceiving the public, or unacceptable on policy grounds. So after two decades in which my passion for politics has gone to define part of who i am, there'll be nothing. Leave wouldn't be a certain thing either, but the status quo is dispiriting enough in itself.
If my joking posts crossed a line did farrage jump the shark
This is what people are being fed.
This is what people are being fed.
I am not saying that it will happen immediately, but I think that we are going towards a big European state. Maybe in 50 years, maybe in even more, and I cannot see why it would be bad in the end.I can just imagine how unpopular Dutch/German etc taxes being spent in Greece would be. Likewise how happy the British would be to have a German or French president..
Why?The EU really will fail if it attempts to over-centralize. I think there are too many smart people involved for that to happen.
If you're unconvinced by either argument surely the status quo is the best option and so a vote to remain is the obvious vote. If people like you don't vote and a low turn out leads to us leaving then you'll have plenty to regret later if (when) it all goes pear shaped.Anyone else thinking of not voting altogether?
I'm in by default but can't bring myself to vote in favour of the EU, nor do I remain convinced by the brexit alternative (not to mention aligning myself with the likes of Griffin, Farage, Hopkins, Murdoch and Skeletor).
I don't want to have to lament my choice later on.
Anyone else thinking of not voting altogether?
I'm in by default but can't bring myself to vote in favour of the EU, nor do I remain convinced by the brexit alternative (not to mention aligning myself with the likes of Griffin, Farage, Hopkins, Murdoch and Skeletor).
I don't want to have to lament my choice later on.