Would they even be interested in playing for Mourinho?
A fair question. The other issue is, does Woodward rate either/both of them, or is he likely to veto any deal. I don't know how much Serie A he watches.
Would they even be interested in playing for Mourinho?
Doubt it is Jose.One unrelated question. Any idea who exactly negotiates the deals. Because the amount of salaries we give and the fees demanded from United for players seem to be really ridiculous many times. At the same time, we only get paltry amounts for anyone we want to sell.
Makes me feel we have a crap team doing it.
Just pay that 65m to Leicester and get Maguire in .
One unrelated question. Any idea who exactly negotiates the deals. Because the amount of salaries we give and the fees demanded from United for players seem to be really ridiculous many times. At the same time, we only get paltry amounts for anyone we want to sell.
Makes me feel we have a crap team doing it.
If it is Jose, then someone fire Ed. He is getting paid for nothing.Doubt it is Jose.
What say you cafe? Should Jose be given a tonne of money to spend in January to boost his heroic battle for 4th place and to replace his previous transfer failures - or should the next manager be allowed to spend that money?
Yeah, deals are getting harder to do and doubly so in January, and I doubt de Ligt would want to come here under the current circumstances, I think @andersj makes a good point, no matter who you blame there is a toxic cloud over United right now and with several big team options I can see a number of players being reluctant to come here.
What if they don't want to come? What if the club is unwilling to sell? What if the club or players demands are excessive? Not trying is one thing but unfortunately it's not so simple trying to sign highly regarded players.Back him or sack him. Signing two highly regarded centre backs who are the age they are is hardly a risk.
Yes. This is true. Funny thing is some fans actually believe this.
If rumours are believed, we tried in the summer and he wasn't interested. Can't see him coming in January.
Both are players we'd be interested in, regardless of Mourinho's position.
Totally, and I can't see how anyone could disagree with that.I don't believe a word of bollocky articles like this but if by some miracle it were true that the board refused to sign a 29, 30 and 32 year old then they were dead fecking right.
That won't be enough, thankfully.Just pay that 65m to Leicester and get Maguire in .
Just pay that 65m to Leicester and get Maguire in .
Jeez another one. Managers don't get all their signings spot on. Clubs with money make amends.Makes you wonder who wanted Bailly and Lindelof, if it was Mourinho then I wouldn't trust him to go to Tesco with a list and bring anything decent back.
Makes you wonder who wanted Bailly and Lindelof, if it was Mourinho then I wouldn't trust him to go to Tesco with a list and bring anything decent back.
Jeez another one. Managers don't get all their signings spot on. Clubs with money make amends.
Just pay that 65m to Leicester and get Maguire in .
They wouldn't sell in January but come summer throw the absolute sink at Inter for Skriniar.
People saying "No thanks " should understand we are not going to get the top targets in January and the young gems would have better options. We are not the attractive club we were !This. For the players those at the club agree upon, that fit the age profile, etc... The money doesn't matter. We're loaded. Anyone half decent will cost similar or a fair chunk of the same at this point either way. Maguire and someone like Skriniar would be ideal. Everyone else CB-wise, bar Smalling, maybe Bailly, and hopefully Tuanzebe could then be fecked off and we'd be in a better place.
It’s a well known fact Fergie never made a single signing that didn’t work out.So now managers at United need to get all their signings spot on??
So you don’t think we need another defender?Wait if we need to spend another 130m on CBs, what the feck has Mourinho actually fixed since he's been here? Our attack is even more dreadful than our defence, and our midfield is completely reliant on Pogba (and will probably need Matic replacing). So what's he actually managed to do with the 300m or so we've already spent?
No, he should be forced to play Bailly and Lindelöf forever. I am also outraged that we allowed Ferguson and other managers to replace the transfers that didn’t work out. Veron should have been kept.
He’s confirmed Stockholm syndrome, I guess. Sociologists should do case studies on him and cult-like behaviour.Wait if we need to spend another 130m on CBs, what the feck has Mourinho actually fixed since he's been here? Our attack is even more dreadful than our defence, and our midfield is completely reliant on Pogba (and will probably need Matic replacing). So what's he actually managed to do with the 300m or so we've already spent?
Pogba's off field issues or hairstyles are not in Jose's control.So has he got the midfield ones right then? Cause Pogba according to most of you needs to go because of his off-field issues (despite being bought for a world record), his 50m midfielder this season can't get into the starting XI over McTominay. And the attack is even worse than than the midfield or defence.