I just can't see why Pep would go from a passing machine like Kane to Haaland.
I can see why Haaland would want to come to City though.
Really?
The only big difference between them when it comes to passing is that Kane like hitting long passes a lot more, Haaland likes short one touch passes more and is more direct while their precision is similar (70 vs 71 %).
They also have similar defensive contributions and are used to play for teams with high pressing.
Then it’s the rest of what they bring:
Goalthreat = Non-penalty goals per 90 (npxG90)+ expected assists per 90 (xA90). Numbers from PL and BL this season:
Kane - 0,36npxG90 + 0,24xA90 = 0,6 total
Haaland - 1,0npxG90 + 0,28xA90 = 1,28 total
Haaland is a potential goat goalscorer.
Haaland is stronger, bigger and faster.
Haaland turns 22 in the summer.
Kane turns 29 in the summer.
There’s “50%” sales on Haaland in the next window, and the next window alone.
Kane will cost 120M +
I can’t see a single good reason why anyone would choose Kane over Haaland if they could choose. Haaland is simply a tier above Kane as a striker and goalscorer and hasn’t even entered his prime yet.