- Joined
- Aug 11, 2021
- Messages
- 1,609
Underrated postgood for us if he followed city since he was young.
Underrated postgood for us if he followed city since he was young.
Managers get sacked a lot more frequently than DoF. The DoF doesn't pick the team, no. But he does have the power to sack the manager...So DoF picks the team every match day?
Benzema's contract ends 2023. No they wouldn't play together, they'd rotate for a season maybe, then Benzema either leaves or stays as backup...Ramos was a baby in 2005.
Ronaldo, Raul, Zidane, Figo and Beckham has never really worked.
Benzema, Haaland and Mbappe can't play together in a normal system or most matches.
Not anymore.Perez will have both mbappe and haaland in his team when bext summers window closes. A new era of galacticos begins. Darth Pogba will turn to the dark side as well and join emperor perezs empire of galacticos. The football world will shudder, but theres hope on the horizon, a small band of rebels will fight emperor perez. lingard, martial and phil jones are all that stand between emperor perez and european domination for a decade.
All is lost.....
They should have won against Holland - so they are not SO bad. But they are SO young.
Pedersen just turned 21, Hanche-Olsen is 24, Ryerson is 23, Meling is 26, Ajer is 23, Thorsby is 25, Thorstvedt is 22, Haaland is 21, Ødegaard is 22, Norrman is 25, Berge is 23, Berg is 23, Hauge is 21, Bjørkan 23, Dønnum 23 and Sørloth 25
2/3 of our squad is 25 or younger....compare that to Sweden who generally have an average age of 30...it makes a difference.
Surely going to city next season now? I think we have be in for him though.
when Mbappe, Messi, Neymar, Di Maria, Icardi are in the same team i don't understand why the above three can't play together. Even CR7 and Cavani are in the same team now.Ramos was a baby in 2005.
Ronaldo, Raul, Zidane, Figo and Beckham has never really worked.
Benzema, Haaland and Mbappe can't play together in a normal system or most matches.
In the end money talks. Haaland won't say no to 1M/week.How often have city actually beaten us to players though? Players we really are chasing, not tabloid rumours? Not very often
And who says city are offering that?In the end money talks. Haaland won't say no to 1M/week.
I doubt he is asking for anthing, its Raiola negotiating numbers and telling Haaland what he's managed to get him.
Mbappe, Messi, Neymar, Di Maria and Icardi on the pitch to the same time.....i doubt that will ever happen.when Mbappe, Messi, Neymar, Di Maria, Icardi are in the same team i don't understand why the above three can't play together. Even CR7 and Cavani are in the same team now.
good for us if he followed city since he was young.
The question is, who are we going to bench next season. Haaland or Ronaldo. That´s a bit of a problem.Hopefully Ole doesn't feck this season up and his relationship with Haaland helps us snag him, otherwise if he goes to another PL side - we're fecked.
Neither.The question is, who are we going to bench next season. Haaland or Ronaldo. That´s a bit of a problem.
The question is, who are we going to bench next season. Haaland or Ronaldo. That´s a bit of a problem.
Ronaldo is 37. He is going to be a useful player but he is not going to be the one and only player for us.
He will be our Cavani of last season whilst Haaland replaces Martial.
Another thing I'm wondering might happen is this:
Rashford_____Greenwood
Bruno
Or
Ronaldo_____Haaland
Bruno
4-4-2.I'm sure Ronnie will be totally fine with the occasional cameo frm the bench
Haaland doesn't do rotation. Neither does Benzema.Managers get sacked a lot more frequently than DoF. The DoF doesn't pick the team, no. But he does have the power to sack the manager...
Benzema's contract ends 2023. No they wouldn't play together, they'd rotate for a season maybe, then Benzema either leaves or stays as backup...
Haaland doesn't do rotation. Neither does Benzema.
Not to mention, Benzema is coming off of one of his best seasons - performance wise. He's still a marvel.
Haaland has more chance of fitting in with United (Ronaldo being 38, toward the end of his game, if Haaland joined) than with Madrid (Benzema being 34 and still at the top of his game).
and beyond that, are even sure you could afford both Ronaldo and Haaland on your payroll?
Ronaldo can still easily be Prem's best players for these 2 years, possibly more. He outscored Lukaku in Serie A with an atrocious Juventus team and a manager. He'll also never agree to play Cavani's bench role. Haaland and Ronaldo can link up well... possibly. Or it will fail. But there's more chance of that than Haaland and Mbappe in the same team. Because if Haaland comes to United, he'd be the heir of Ronaldo. If Haaland goes to Madrid, him and Mbappe would share the spotlight which I don't think either of the two want./Ronaldo is 37. He is going to be a useful player but he is not going to be the one and only player for us.
He will be our Cavani of last season whilst Haaland replaces Martial.
Another thing I'm wondering might happen is this:
Rashford_____Greenwood
Bruno
Or
Ronaldo_____Haaland
Bruno
Ah yes, I'm sure Diario Madridista has absolutely no ulterior motive for spreading this story...
Sportbible referencing TEAMtalk referencing Dario Madridsta’s blog no less.Pack it up folks, Sportbible have concluded. Party is over.
Well, Perez gave Ramos the boot, too.
The guy is hellbent on forming the nexr Galactiocs, and since Mbappe will come relatively cheap, it is certainly doable from a purely financial pov. Then there will be the Oilacticos from Paris who'll probably throw the Platinum kitchen sink at Raiola to get him as a replacement for Mbappe, and there'll be City who are desperate for some legacy and a No9.
That's going to be some stiff competition for his signing, and beyond that, are even sure you could afford both Ronaldo and Haaland on your payroll?
Raiola asked Chelsea for £820k a week during the summer, on top of 40m in commission to him and 150m transfer fee to Dortmund. It will be the four you mentioned and then some, considering that the transfer fee is halved next summer, so £1m a week is feasible.We’ll have a bunch of non-playing players off the payroll next year. Mata, Matic, Lingard and Cavani. That should be enough to cover Haaland’s wages.
Probably one of De Gea or Henderson as well.
Well, Perez gave Ramos the boot, too.
The guy is hellbent on forming the nexr Galactiocs, and since Mbappe will come relatively cheap, it is certainly doable from a purely financial pov. Then there will be the Oilacticos from Paris who'll probably throw the Platinum kitchen sink at Raiola to get him as a replacement for Mbappe, and there'll be City who are desperate for some legacy and a No9.
That's going to be some stiff competition for his signing, and beyond that, are even sure you could afford both Ronaldo and Haaland on your payroll?
Haaland has just enjoyed a successful international break, scoring five times in three games as Norway look to qualify for the 2022 World Cup.
Rumoured that they're giving him an £80m signing on fee. That's far from cheap.
This part below proved to me that whoever wrote the article have no idea what they are talking about.
We lost 0-3 at home to Turkey (in March) and drew 1-1 with Netherlands. We still have to play both of them away in the final 4 games. Sure we will probably (*knock on wood) beat Latvia and Montenegro at home. But unless Netherlands cocks it up we won't pass them to guarantee WC qualification (currently both have 13 points, but the dutch have a 9 better GD). And Turkey is 2 points behind, they just have to beat us at home (or draw if we lose in Amsterdam) to beat us to 2nd place.
Even if we manage to retain 2nd place that still means going into a second round of qualifiers against 11 other teams vying for 3 WC spots.
Madrid would be Barcelona level 3 years from now if they actually do that. All 3 would be on insane wages unsustainable for any club. At this point, as good as Haaland is, I don't want him. 1 million per week plus gazillion to Raiola and his father at age 20? He's not prime Messi or Ronaldo. Mbappe looks to be the same in terms of demands. Utterly ridiculous. Wage caps should be placed like they are in America. And especially agent fees.Madrid rebuild done in one summer if they managed to add Haaland, Mbappe and Pogba in one window.
I'm not against wage caps and don't know how they do it there. But looking at how City and PSG have been fecking FFP over I seriously doubt that'd be any good here. Rather, it'd make all the good players come to City and PSG I think.Madrid would be Barcelona level 3 years from now if they actually do that. All 3 would be on insane wages unsustainable for any club. At this point, as good as Haaland is, I don't want him. 1 million per week plus gazillion to Raiola and his father at age 20? He's not prime Messi or Ronaldo. Mbappe looks to be the same in terms of demands. Utterly ridiculous. Wage caps should be placed like they are in America. And especially agent fees.