Marwood
Full Member
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2021
- Messages
- 4,740
The interview was talking in retrospect. It was after the Dortmund transfer. There's a big fat subtext to what Alfie says in that interview, and that subtext screams Ole.
Solskjaer wasn't at all safe in his chair at that point. It's blindingly obvious that the dad of the Goal Machine was talking abt Ole and the risk of him getting booted. Also from the next passage - about the direction of a club in the last 5-10 years. While Dortmund has changed head coach pretty frequently too, it hasn't affected their direction as much as Man Utd, who has more looked like a drunk driver. And at the time of that transfer Man Utd was 8 points off a CL spot.
So team Haaland was justified in being sceptical. And the first poster summarized it quite well, but could've pointed to his source in the first place. Posters in the Caf don't point to sources much. Would make discussions more meaningful.
I think you guys have got the quote twisted. Haaland snr is saying don't move becuase of who the manager is. Which makes sense. The average manager lasts about three years.
But this isn't specific to United. You guys are turning that into Haaland not coming because Ole might not be here long term.
Totally different things.
If Haaland's camp were so concerned about managerial stability why would they go Dortmund? Using the same rational they'd turn down Madrid right? Because who knows how long a manager lasts there.
If they wanted a club where you know who the manager is going to be for the full length of the players contract, which club would that be exactly?