Erik ten Hag | Currently unemployed

Reading these threads makes you realize how some fans and football is basically and nonsensically commented. Dealing with people isn't about fear or arm around the shoulder whoever make that point should stay away from management.

Exactly, Scholes had a short lived managerial career and the others haven't managed. If you wanted fear, just get Roy Keane in. SAF wasn't about fear, he had the right balance between discipline and supporting the players and that's the balance that must be found.
 
I don't think any coach is classed as the messiah. It's going to take some serious work to turn us around.
A good manager will be a good start. Then bring in technical players, players who have a first touch that can open up the game, no more brute athletes and pace merchants. We need to build a technical skillful side. Sancho is one we need another 2. Then a DM goes without saying and full backs good in the final third.
 
Last nights result should have no bearing really. Everyone loses cup games they should win. It's not like Ajax didn't turn up or play well, they were the better side last night.

How many games did Fergie lose over the years to inferior teams in one off cup matches? How many times has Pep lost in the CL with the best team at his disposal? It happens to the best.

He's still playing brilliant football, winning all their groups games despite being a selling club. Not many teams could sell De Jong, De Ligt, Ziyech, VDB etc and still be almost as strong as before, especially on their limited budget.

Poch losing 3-2 when being 2-0 up with a collection of world class stars is bottling it. Losing a game by a smash and grab when you've played very well isn't.
 
We’ve gone out of Europe to Spanish opposition 5 years running. That can’t be a coincidence, we just shit ourselves with the ball at our feet. Ten Hag can fix that.

I think he’s our best chance of replacing these shit players with good ones as to play his style of football he needs players who are good in possession. He’s got no choice but to ship out our whole team and start again.
 

TheEuropeanlad is right in point that out. But he was also right last week pointing out the mentality issues. (post 2019, that is). Might be harder for ETH to get that working when he usually has to replace important players very often.

 
He was a title winner in Germany with the underdog team though
It is like calling PSV underdogs in the Netherlands. Dortmund were no underdogs. They had the better team in Germany when they won the league.
 
If the result made AJAX think itd be fine to move him on. Good. Thats what we want. Because this guy is more of a football manager than our previous two combined (nice guy and angry unstable man).
 
It is like calling PSV underdogs in the Netherlands. Dortmund were no underdogs. They had the better team in Germany when they won the league.
They had the better team because he made them the better team.
Kagawa, Blaczykowski, Lewandowski, Gündogan, Grosskreutz, Hummels, these players were nobodies and/or youngsters when they joined BVB, Sahin, Schmelzer, Götze etc came from the youth setup.
Of course BVB were the underdogs against Bayern, relatively speaking.
 
:lol: psg was playing real Madrid while Ajax was playing benefica. Benefica was the underdog, while real Madrid was the favorites. Despite that psg dominated real Madrid the majority of the tie and only loss because of bad errors by their defenders. Moreover, having very lazy forward who does little off the ball. Ajax should have won this and I m not sure how they didnt.

This type of rationale only make sense if you don't consider the squads and the budgets.
I think ETH would prefer Verrati to Alvarez, or Wijnaldum to Klaassen.
ETH would start half of PSG's bench if he had them at Ajax.

I watched the entirety of the first game. PSG didn't "dominate" RM.
 
I think everyone is so obsessed with their own checklist or personal favorite appointee (for whatever reason) that they'll find fault with any/every other candidate.

There'll be no perfect candidate because posters would either say i) they're not PL proven, ii) they're not big club proven, iii) they're over the hill, iv) he's not a proven winner like Conte, v) they're bottlers/never won a title or vi) even if they did win a title, it will be dismissed because it was a "tin pot" cup or league, vii) he's too defensive or conversely "has no plan B"...Hell, we could be offered Pep tomorrow and some would say tiki-taka is boring or he can only win with money...

All the above are opinions of course (some more informed than others) and they're all valid. Hell, I'm no football expert so I post a ton of drivel in here - and that's on a good day.

Ten Hag is my favored candidate for a few "personal" reasons. I am excited that for once, we'd be appointing a "hipster" manager (as the Caf politely calls them) who will be a breathe of fresh air. He has a vision and clear way of playing - plays attacking football, and seemingly takes his game to the opponents. He's done well in Europe and has worked with rebuilding sides. He seems fairly "strict" and able to discipline/manage a squad and I am just excited to see what he could do with a little more quality in his squad and with a good structure in place (debatable at United but hopefully it changes). The timing also seems perfect with the vacancy and his time at Ajax seemingly coming to an end.

Of course, this "vision and attacking philosophy/pressing high up" are all attributes i like in football. This doesn't mean that those are the qualities everyone favors and he'll still be a risk in this league and at a club this size.
 
It is like calling PSV underdogs in the Netherlands. Dortmund were no underdogs. They had the better team in Germany when they won the league.
And why did they have a better team under his watch? Where did he take them from and where did he take them to?
 
Yes it did. Like I stated, Ten Hag is a huge risk. Benefica was an easy draw and he couldn't even get pass them. I believe he might have fallen even below Rodgers now after this performance. This was definitely one of the worst result and unexpected result in the champion league so far in the round of 16
You've been quiet since last week :lol:. Welcome back.
 
It’s probably got something to do with the fact that most of the time they’re facing far better teams, how many were they expected to win? Benfica last night sure but who else?
 
Is he a bottler now?

Wouldn't say he is a bottler, as Ajax have done a lot better than they should be (although he did get the benefit of a good generation.)

My concern with him, is that he is what I class a ideologue where he has one way of playing and doesn't move anyway from his plan A, even if the situation requires a tweak. By this, I mean someone like Pep and Wenger, in that they have a great plan A but won't tweak that; hence why Pep has trouble with the CL.

Personally, I prefer managers like Tuchel as he is flexible and will do what is best for the team as a whole, rather than what is best for his thoughts.

That said, Poch kind of comes into the ideologue category too so not sure what the answer is.
 


It's kind of a mental block for them I guess, bigger than EtH this failure.


I think it's called "being Dutch". I'm afraid they might take offense if you call their national football identity a mental block.
 
Go get him now, this should be mission critical, get him ASAP and let him work with Ralph to understand who should go and who should stay and then back him in the summer.
 
Couldn't believe that they were unable to score. They didn't have any 100% chances (like the one Elanga missed for example) but they were always looking dangerous and created quite a few decent chances in the box. Lack of composure really let them down.

I don't think Benfica had any half-decent chance of scoring before the goal or after that. Non-existent fault that led to the set piece too.
 
Wouldn't say he is a bottler, as Ajax have done a lot better than they should be (although he did get the benefit of a good generation.)

My concern with him, is that he is what I class a ideologue where he has one way of playing and doesn't move anyway from his plan A, even if the situation requires a tweak. By this, I mean someone like Pep and Wenger, in that they have a great plan A but won't tweak that; hence why Pep has trouble with the CL.

Personally, I prefer managers like Tuchel as he is flexible and will do what is best for the team as a whole, rather than what is best for his thoughts.

That said, Poch kind of comes into the ideologue category too so not sure what the answer is.

He's done a great job there and his record in Europe is pretty decent. But, he does give off that stubborn vibe, where he's adamant his way will work regardless. It could be that he might just be another LVG my way or the highway painting by numbers approach to football. It's works in the relatively small setting at Ajax but might be harder to implement to great success at a bigger club.

I actually enjoyed watching Tuchel outwit Pep in the CL Final, seeing City revert to Stokesque long throws and lumping balls into the box because they ran out if ideas was brilliant. Maybe that is the kind of flexible coach Utd need, rather than looking for someone to instill patterns and a style.
 
Yeah, a manager that "strikes fear" into players. When I read these kind of things I'm close to erupt, fear bring nervousness, it's a negative feeling that is more likely to stiffle people and affect negatively their actions. A good manager brings accountability, confidence and togetherness. And while I see what they are trying to convey, the fact that they talked about striking fear shows that they are clueless, they are terrible communicators and don't understand that what they felt wasn't fear of the manager but fear to disappoint the team, the manager and maybe lose their spot which is due to accountability.
Agree.
 
If you love football, allow yourself an hour and watch the yesterday's game.

Ajax played on the front foot the whole game. First 35 minutes they had numerous chances.

They asked the right questions, there was always at least 2 players in the 16 yard box waiting for the right cross, or for the ball to fall nicely.

They play with purpose, they are comfortable with the ball. It's everything we're not.
And everything we should aspire to.

Just watch the game. I'd be thrilled if we played like that.

That's enough for me. Get him here asap.
 
Last nights result should have no bearing really. Everyone loses cup games they should win. It's not like Ajax didn't turn up or play well, they were the better side last night.

How many games did Fergie lose over the years to inferior teams in one off cup matches? How many times has Pep lost in the CL with the best team at his disposal? It happens to the best.

He's still playing brilliant football, winning all their groups games despite being a selling club. Not many teams could sell De Jong, De Ligt, Ziyech, VDB etc and still be almost as strong as before, especially on their limited budget.

Poch losing 3-2 when being 2-0 up with a collection of world class stars is bottling it. Losing a game by a smash and grab when you've played very well isn't.
Your last paragraph sums up the hilarious lack of objectivity on here when it comes to comparing poch against eth. Who actually thinks it's the manager that bottles things anyway. Maybe on rare occasions when someone tries to completely shut up shop and it doesn't work but usually it's the players collectively. The manager can influence that by changing mentality and improving structures but that takes time. PSG have a long history of bottling big games which will be a difficult thing to resolve and needs some bug players moving on (ahem neymar)
 
That was his peak, but he finished in the top three for three seasons straight. They weren't boring. What's all this revisionism about? Kane , Son and Delle Ali were some of the most exciting forwards in the PL during his time there. England can thank him for believing in and developing a young Kane. Are you going to forget how exciting Christian Eriksen was under Pochettino as well? Kyle Walker and Trippier? Even Townsend had his best patch of his career at Spurs and looked very promising at one time. How about the rise of Danny Rose there? Pochetinno brought the best out young players. Toby Alderweireld was considered world class under his touteledge.

He also made Southampton very exciting before his time at Spurs, making the likes of Luke Shaw and Nathaniel Clyne two of the most coveted young English fullbacks at the time. Lallana, Jay Rodriguez and the average Ricky Lambert had their best time of their careers under him and earned unlikely international call ups. Why do you think Liverpool raided his Southampton squad? He promoted Calum Chambers, James Ward-Prawse and made Schneirdelin, Victor Wanyama and Lovren household names. His influence runs deeper than he gets credit for. That Southampton team was one of the most entertaining teams in England and he basically became England's defacto coach and talent scout while having them play brilliant football
It’s not revisionism, they were a boring team and it was called out plenty at the time.
 
Your last paragraph sums up the hilarious lack of objectivity on here when it comes to comparing poch against eth. Who actually thinks it's the manager that bottles things anyway. Maybe on rare occasions when someone tries to completely shut up shop and it doesn't work but usually it's the players collectively. The manager can influence that by changing mentality and improving structures but that takes time. PSG have a long history of bottling big games which will be a difficult thing to resolve and needs some bug players moving on (ahem neymar)

That argument would make sense if the big players that you are mentioning didn't win significantly more than Pochettino including the CL. While I dont' think that Pochettino should be accused of bottling the CL but your point is pretty weak, you are not talking about players that haven't won in the past including the recent past.
 
It’s not revisionism, they were a boring team and it was called out plenty at the time.

Yeah, sometimes I wonder if people watched them. While I wouldn't call them boring, I wouldn't call them exciting or beautiful either. Their strength was to regain possession very high and score on fast breaks against disorganized defenses, they used to struggle a lot against settled defenses and people criticized them a lot for that. Then they increasingly struggled to regain possession high and it was the beginning of the end for Pochettino.
 
That argument would make sense if the big players that you are mentioning didn't win significantly more than Pochettino including the CL. While I dont' think that Pochettino should be accused of bottling the CL but your point is pretty weak, you are not talking about players that haven't won in the past including the recent past.

I don’t think his argument is weak (that managers generally don’t bottle games, it’s mostly a collective thing among players). I think you misconstrue the problematic. The ability to keep cool, organized, aggressive and balanced isn’t like some key a player or manager can collect and eternally carry around to keep the team from bottling. Messi has won everything but a WC, yet has been his team’s key man in several majestic bottles. United had some spectacular unravellings even under Ferguson. Tuchel watched PSG collapse several times, only to win the CL against odds last year, and Pep is the worlds most successful manager of the last fifteen years, regardless of his tendency to ‘overthink’ or ‘underthink’ decisive CL games for a decade now.

Bottlings are generally things brought together by circumstances and collective human reactions that seem almost impossible to safeguard against. If sometimes the lightning strikes twice in the same place, people dig up all manners of explanations to account for it, disregarding the simple fact that, just as lightning strikes pretty much by chance, if it strikes twice in the same place, it will generally be by chance too.

(Disclaimer: before anyone butts in with a point about lightning conductors, I think statistics will back up that football managers are not better lightning conductors than anyone else.)