erikcred
Full Member
- Joined
- May 6, 2022
- Messages
- 2,372
A draw? A loss with good xG.If a draw is enough at home against a pretty poor Spurs, then just
A draw? A loss with good xG.If a draw is enough at home against a pretty poor Spurs, then just
Disheartening watching the other PL games on a weekly basis and seeing just how far behind we are in terms of tactics or setup. Million miles away.
Chelsea have been a joke for 2 years and took a ‘risk’ on a relatively unknown manager and suddenly look like title challengers yet 3 years and and countless former players and millions spent and we just look like an expensively built Sunderland
Let's be real, a draw against Spurs at home would be hailed by a large portion of the fanbase as a positive result against a strong team and a potential turning point for our season.
Are we?
Let's be real, a draw against Spurs at home would be hailed by a large portion of the fanbase as a positive result against a strong team and a potential turning point for our season.
don't know why, but today really has shown that
Disheartening watching the other PL games on a weekly basis and seeing just how far behind we are in terms of tactics or setup. Million miles away.
Chelsea have been a joke for 2 years and took a ‘risk’ on a relatively unknown manager and suddenly look like title challengers yet 3 years and and countless former players and millions spent and we just look like an expensively built Sunderland
Disheartening watching the other PL games on a weekly basis and seeing just how far behind we are in terms of tactics or setup. Million miles away.
Chelsea have been a joke for 2 years and took a ‘risk’ on a relatively unknown manager and suddenly look like title challengers yet 3 years and and countless former players and millions spent and we just look like an expensively built Sunderland
don't know why, but today really has shown that
Because you see teams with first year managers absolutely drilling average and poor sides, while our 3rd year manager talks about the "process" after going toe to toe against the same sides.
But hey our fanbase wrote a fecking petition to keep him and blamed the Glazers for why he was a shit manager.
The manager but also the players he's bought. Miles away.The more you watch other teams the more you realize how far behind we are.
Its a first season honeymoon period. Tell me how ten hags first season went.And last season Ange finished ahead of ETH just like ‘pizza pep’ (and various other managers) are on course to do this season.
Ange is currently playing better football than we have this season? Nah, not for me. Wasn't great vs Brentford, wasn't good vs Arsenal. Skimmed it against an easier tie in Europe. Played a shit game vs Coventry.You're forgetting Slot over at Liverpool. Honey period or not, these clubs have continued to play better football than United. Spurs still play better football and have even this season despite beginning poorly. Chelsea played better football under Pochettino and continue to do so this season under Maresca
Its a first season honeymoon period. Tell me how ten hags first season went.
Every manager has a honeymoon period. That's my point. It's included and not limited to United managers.Using your own logic, ETH’s first season must have just been a honeymoon period then.
Every manager has a honeymoon period. That's my point. It's included and not limited to United managers.
My point was just that we can't conclude Chelsea have sorted all their issues out.
What are reasons that he should be given more time? I dont see anyBut we definitely can conclude Ten Hag is not good enough and should be replaced.
The simple reason is that a decision was made in summer to continue with him, and now the season has only started. I'm sure the new executives and DoF will assess his performance soberly in relation to the goals and expectations envisioned for this season, so it is not like he is safe whatever he does in the coming weeks. But it is still not really the time to make that judgement now.What are reasons that he should be given more time? I dont see any
What are reasons that he should be given more time? I dont see any
If Moyesie had one, it lasted 2 games.Every manager has a honeymoon period. That's my point. It's included and not limited to United managers.
My point was just that we can't conclude Chelsea have sorted all their issues out.
After 2 full seasons and spent so much money, this are only excuses indeedWell so far from the Ten Hag in crowd we’ve seen “injuries, rebuild, squad not good enough, system needs to click, xg, there’s no other good managers, we just need to finish our chances, Chelsea haven’t sorted all their issues out”.
Yet to see any actual reasons rather than excuses yet though.
Once you are too far away from too 4 you wont make it. Another season without CL would be bad. So if he does jot win the next games he is out, irrespective how early in the seasonThe simple reason is that a decision was made in summer to continue with him, and now the season has only started. I'm sure the new executives and DoF will assess his performance soberly in relation to the goals and expectations envisioned for this season, so it is not like he is safe whatever he does in the coming weeks. But it is still not really the time to make that judgement now.
The simple reason is that a decision was made in summer to continue with him, and now the season has only started. I'm sure the new executives and DoF will assess his performance soberly in relation to the goals and expectations envisioned for this season, so it is not like he is safe whatever he does in the coming weeks. But it is still not really the time to make that judgement now.
It’s kind of crazy for me to think that I enjoyed watching us the most when Ole was at the wheel and I was desperate to see him leave towards the end of his United managerial career.
Our lack of progress since has been frightening.
You can.But we definitely can conclude Ten Hag is not good enough and should be replaced.
Well if you bucket every piece of context as just some excuse it becomes a pointless debate.Well so far from the Ten Hag in crowd we’ve seen “injuries, rebuild, squad not good enough, system needs to click, xg, there’s no other good managers, we just need to finish our chances, Chelsea haven’t sorted all their issues out”.
Yet to see any actual reasons rather than excuses yet though.
Well if you bucket every piece of context as just some excuse it becomes a pointless debate.
The squad is young is the latest (it's not compared to others though).Well so far from the Ten Hag in crowd we’ve seen “injuries, rebuild, squad not good enough, system needs to click, xg, there’s no other good managers, we just need to finish our chances, Chelsea haven’t sorted all their issues out”.
Yet to see any actual reasons rather than excuses yet though.
You can't seem to post without constant hyperbole can you? It's like reading the script of an Indian TV seriel.Ah yes, our manager is shit because of “context”. That’s a great new catch-all one to excuse our failures with.
ClassicYou can.
More rumours circulating
You can't seem to post without constant hyperbole can you? It's like reading the script of an Indian TV seriel.
I can sense sarcasm. It's clear you weren't being sarcastic, unless you wanted to defeat your own argument.Don’t worry - you’re not the only one here that struggles to identify sarcasm. It can afflict us all.
In fairness, I don’t think that will surprise many of us? The ETHFC might pretend to be shocked, but will point to Luke Shaw not been available.I think Spurs will surprise a few with how much better they are than us.