I don’t think he’s getting sacked. If he was there would be news coming out. Every journalist is just guessing.
Well, until the meeting is done absolutely nobody outside of that room is going to know.
I don’t think he’s getting sacked. If he was there would be news coming out. Every journalist is just guessing.
Prepare the bot army!Sorry, but I got inside information. As long as the poll in this thread isn't at least 95% in favor of sack then Ten Hag will keep his job.
Hopefully that friend of his suffers a horrible life. If he even existed.Maybe our insider Treblechamp can shed some light on the situation.
Wasn't a renewal, they simply triggered an extension in his existing deal.There's no way he's getting the boot two months in a new season after they publicly backed him and renewed his contract in the summer. It will be a results need to improve but we believe we have the right team in place to achieve them, or words to that effect.
Big day today. Basically a public announcement of weather the club cares about football performance under the new ownership.
Under the Glazers they admitted they didn't.
If we keep ETH that's Ineos admitting they don't either. So it's a big fecking day all things considered
Lovely.Hopefully that friend of his suffers a horrible life. If he even existed.
INEOS did seem to settle on keeping him when other avenues didn't pan out. Had to go crawling back.
Anyone but Southgate haha.Who would be that right manager for you?
Exercised a 1 year option. Not really a new contract.There's no way he's getting the boot two months in a new season after they publicly backed him and renewed his contract in the summer. It will be a results need to improve but we believe we have the right team in place to achieve them, or words to that effect.
You can't talk that much shit and come away unscathed. Nothing worse than ITK who isn't ITK.Lovely.
If there was a chance he could go today then the bigger journos would know and would make a big deal out of it. I think the small journos are just looking for something to make a story out of here. If it was a genuine review then I think he'd be gone, because it'd look stupid to stick with him again. But I don't think they're even bothered about Ten Hag really. The tidbits about concerns over CL etc is just shit they're putting out to satisfy us lot that aren't happy.
Biggest issue with Ole was giving him the job after those 10 wins. If we stuck to our guns and reviewed it at the end of the season I don't think we would have kept him as we dropped off at the end of the season.Sure. I agree.
It's just that keeping someone as an interim risks the Ole situation from happening all over again.
My thoughts exactly, the journos would’ve been briefed. There’s no way someone like Ornstein wouldn’t have reported earlier today that ETH is on the verge of being sacked.If there was a chance he could go today then the bigger journos would know and would make a big deal out of it. I think the small journos are just looking for something to make a story out of here. If it was a genuine review then I think he'd be gone, because it'd look stupid to stick with him again. But I don't think they're even bothered about Ten Hag really. The tidbits about concerns over CL etc is just shit they're putting out to satisfy us lot that aren't happy.
A year before his existing contract was due to expire. That was a vote of confidence.Exercised a 1 year option. Not really a new contract.
It is another 9m spent on him, so kinda a new contract. Which was totally idiotic to do, much better managers than him entered the season in their final year of contract.Exercised a 1 year option. Not really a new contract.
Wrong place to call for patience.Guys. Nothing is indicating him staying or going. Just be patient.
Well I am.Wrong place to call for patience.
Absolutely. We went to shit after beating PSG away. Ole had a brutal 11 months of form until Bruno was signed and lockdown happened.Biggest issue with Ole was giving him the job after those 10 wins. If we stuck to our guns and reviewed it at the end of the season I don't think we would have kept him as we dropped off at the end of the season.
If Ruud gets a appointed as interim till the end of the season, we need to be very clear and stick to that.
The biggest sports media company in the country and a bloody terrestrial news channel both have cameras outside the meeting. I think it's fair to say journos are making a big deal of it.
Maybe time off at this point to recharge after a hectic start IS the best way to improve?Is anyone else annoyed he's gone on holiday?
His job is probably safe, yet the performances have been utterly abject, so why isn't he working with the coaching staff, and players (many not going as we've been so bad) on trying to improve things?
“Southgate keeps coming to reception with his CV and this will escalate if we sack Erik”I really want to see what's in the "PROS" column on the whiteboard chart...
Such an incompetence in a ruthless billionaire world is really weird and unexplainable to me.
There's no way he's getting the boot two months in a new season after they publicly backed him and renewed his contract in the summer. It will be a results need to improve but we believe we have the right team in place to achieve them, or words to that effect.
Maybe time off at this point to recharge after a hectic start IS the best way to improve?
A vote of confidence would have been a new 3 year deal. Like Iraola and O'Neil signings new deals last season after a season in charge.A year before his existing contract was due to expire. That was a vote of confidence.
I wouldn't be surprised if they didn't even think about firing him at all. He's got them all under his spell.
They've both already said he's staying though. They're just being tits because there's nothing else to report on.
Voice of reason.
Berrada, the CEO wants to win the league by 2028. That's the long term plan. We're miles off that. ETH isn't winning the league with us. He should be gone.What a thread. People claiming the new structure is toothless, clueless and worse because they won't sack EtH today (at a regularly scheduled meeting) or that Ruud would be a good interim (wait what? A United legend, he did well for a little while in Holland? And came here to improve our strikers... oh right), or that fans are giving up on the club? Give up then if that's how you back the team Having supported United through relegation (and would again) not to mention some pretty dire seasons over the last 50 years, I'm amazed people think firing ten Hag a few games after giving him their backing following a review would seem anything other than clueless and reactionary. I don't want a reaction from SJR and co based on media mayhem and fan outrage, I want rational decisions based on a long-term plan. We are continually reminded that they have one. Maybe we'd all like to be personally informed what that is but it doesn't work like this. By all means be open to change, but do so with a clear eye on the right coach and the right coach after that if necessary given our new set up, not on who's there now or who's available. Yes we're in trough and I am as ftrustated as everyone else at the way we're playing and how EtH seems unable to explain what he's doing, but I think sacking now and appointing Tuchel when he apparently was not the best fit in June, or worse, Southgate or Ruud, would not suggest the plan has much thought put into it.
What a thread. People claiming the new structure is toothless, clueless and worse because they won't sack EtH today (at a regularly scheduled meeting) or that Ruud would be a good interim (wait what? A United legend, he did well for a little while in Holland? And came here to improve our strikers... oh right), or that fans are giving up on the club? Give up then if that's how you back the team Having supported United through relegation (and would again) not to mention some pretty dire seasons over the last 50 years, I'm amazed people think firing ten Hag a few games after giving him their backing following a review would seem anything other than clueless and reactionary. I don't want a reaction from SJR and co based on media mayhem and fan outrage, I want rational decisions based on a long-term plan. We are continually reminded that they have one. Maybe we'd all like to be personally informed what that is but it doesn't work like this. By all means be open to change, but do so with a clear eye on the right coach and the right coach after that if necessary given our new set up, not on who's there now or who's available. Yes we're in trough and I am as ftrustated as everyone else at the way we're playing and how EtH seems unable to explain what he's doing, but I think sacking now and appointing Tuchel when he apparently was not the best fit in June, or worse, Southgate or Ruud, would not suggest the plan has much thought put into it.