I feel the 7-0 killed him and the team. He never overcame thatSee below. 83 games. Please stop. Eight three games?!?!
I feel the 7-0 killed him and the team. He never overcame thatSee below. 83 games. Please stop. Eight three games?!?!
Only City won more trophiesDid you forget last season?
I didn't say the worst under Ten Hag is better than the best under Ole.
I dont think we've been as bad in a single game where we were thumped by a bottom of the table side though.
Only City won more trophies
Things go wrong because that’s how it tends to go! Managers are just as disposable - if not moreso - than players.Pep is at city for years, arteta is at arsenal quite some time now and klopp was at Liverpool for years. 3 best teams in England.
The 2/3 year managers only last that long because things have went wrong.
I feel the 7-0 killed him and the team. He never overcame that
Brentford 3-0 Manchester United
Manchester United 0-3 Bournemouth
Crystal Palace 4-0 Manchester United
Manchester United 1-3 Brighton
Some still value the FA CupYou've got to be taking the piss.
Yeah that's my thinking on it, get us into a better position and maybe in 2 years could attract Inzaghi/Nagelsmann heck maybe Alonso
Yeah - season one was very mitigated by the fact we were deep in lots of competitions. There was a pervading theme of “we’ll play better next year - this is about setting the tone, getting used to the league etc.” — then after the World Cup we fell off a cliff performance wise and most victories were grinded unattractive wins.
Lot of home form heavy lifting - low scoring but cleansheets from the Varane-Martinez-Shaw combo at the back, and Rashford patches to score enough to see us through.
We do realise that if we continue the league trend from last season that we’re in relegation form.I see no point in sacking him and having RVN as an interim manager and there is no manager available I can see out there that would be a given that he would any better.
If things happen near the end of the season when it has got no better then I would be happy for us to go after a young manager that has had more success and not just over one season.
This old chestnut again. Looking at the owners he’s supposedly fallen out with who could blame him?
He’s a top manager and currently available, work with him and I’m sure he’ll succeed.
Arsenal took 2.5 seasons and were out of the CL for 3 before they made a huge and frankly unexpected leap.
I agree ten hags United would need to show more this season, a lot more, to be comparable to that 5th place finish from Arteta. However no manager here will get the time and space Arteta did at Arsenal to get his methods put in. There's an expectation to get it in place and win games in tandem, which just makes the job a lot harder. If Arteta were here he would last beyond his first full season.
There's no one in the world that could do better.We do realise that if we continue the league trend from last season that we’re in relegation form.
I didn't even insinuate that. I'm saying ten hag should show a lot more this season if the comparison to Arteta were to hold better weight.So what I’m taking from your post is that we haven’t given ETH enough time?
None of these teams are sides rock bottom of the table. Ole had thumping to Everton toward the bottom too. Unsure on how this is related to the general point I made.Brentford 3-0 Manchester United
Manchester United 0-3 Bournemouth
Crystal Palace 4-0 Manchester United
Manchester United 1-3 Brighton
Personally I couldn't care less for numbers of the people with the wallet are clowns. Arteta didn't have clowns spending the cash.You also need to look at Arsenal's spend, the more the club spent the more the team performances incrementally improved, because the players were being integrated into a system that was proving to be successful. By the 400 million mark they were challenging for the league.
You could argue that if Arteta was given a plethora of resources at an earlier point of convenience his football intelligibility would see a drastic development with his teams performances.
It's the exact opposite with Erik, he's such an inept manager tactically that despite spending 650m he's regressed to an even worse basis beyond the point which he was hired under Ragnick being 6th.
I don't think it's comparable to measure Erik hypothetically against other managers given the circumstances, it was the right decision to hire him on the premise of his perceived value but intrinsically he's catastrophically failed to deliver.
He's only got himself to blame under those parameters, I think most managers improve if given the resources and time he has, they might not win the league but the bar is so low with Erik that it's indispensable to sack him on the merit of the club's respect for itself alone, no other manager has ever plunged to such depths aside Moyes and we know his level as a manager.
Some still value the FA Cup
Maybe not the current crop of fan but it is huge for professional footballers and managers to have won the most prestigious domestic Cup in the world.
What happens across Europe is of no concern to me. English football is where united reside and if you look throughout English history from Busby babes era to the present day, the most dominant clubs generally do with managers who have been at the club for longer periods of time and that includes todayThings go wrong because that’s how it tends to go! Managers are just as disposable - if not moreso - than players.
Pep is at a sandbox football club and is the best manager in world football. Klopp is (was) the second best and was running on fumes for the last 18 months or so of that. Extreme examples which the rest of European football doesn’t align with. You’ve got Simeone as the major exception to the rule - though he is the highest paid manager in the world.
Arteta’s been there for a while because he’s shown linear success but it’ll reach a point soon where he has to prove he can do more than finish 2nd. Or maybe it won’t - Arsenal historically do have the cult of the manager like we do.
Last season doesn't count because of the injuries, in their minds.
Simeone is also at a club where they don't really expect him to win anything or even compete that much.You’ve got Simeone as the major exception to the rule - though he is the highest paid manager in the world.
I didn't even insinuate that. I'm saying ten hag should show a lot more this season if the comparison to Arteta were to hold better weight.
And more generally to that, Arsenal give time and space to managers that generally allows them to be shit for extended periods before getting it right.
Ten hag has had more than enough time to show progression from 3rd place and hasn't exhibited it - which is a separate point.
None of these teams are sides rock bottom of the table. Ole had thumping to Everton toward the bottom too. Unsure on how this is related to the general point I made.
Yes. But the causal relationship is that managers who are dominating, get to keep their jobs longer.English football is where united reside and if you look throughout English history from Busby babes era to the present day, the most dominant clubs generally do with managers who have been at the club for longer periods of time and that includes today
Pep is at city for years, arteta is at arsenal quite some time now and klopp was at Liverpool for years. 3 best teams in England.
The 2/3 year managers only last that long because things have went wrong.
Yeah, then Ole went on a run winning 1 from 7.With Ole he got beat by 13th placed Leicester 4-2, Liverpool 5-0 and Watford 4-1. He started the season well getting 4 wins in the opening 5 (the other being a draw).
It was a small slump in form that got him sacked. We were abject during that small period. ETHs bad form has been for 83 games.
They weren't far off it. They were a lot closer to that point than any of the mid table sides you named.Watford weren’t rock bottom of the table either.
They weren’t even in the relegation zone.
I see no point in sacking him and having RVN as an interim manager and there is no manager available I can see out there that would be a given that he would any better.
If things happen near the end of the season when it has got no better then I would be happy for us to go after a young manager that has had more success and not just over one season.
Yeah, then Ole went on a run winning 1 from 7.
I agree on Ten Hag being extended in shite form, but I don't think he had a run where it was 1 win from 7. If he had that now (he's roughly at the same point Ole was) then yeah I'm sure he'd be sacked. He should be sacked sooner than that.
They weren't far off it. They were a lot closer to that point than any of the mid table sides you named.
Getting a roasting on Sly Sports
By Jay fecking Boothroyd and fecking O'HaraGetting a roasting on Sly Sports
The idea is to correct it then and that is what we are hoping for and that will be the same for an interim because it will be these players that have to do it.We do realise that if we continue the league trend from last season that we’re in relegation form.
Nothing you haven't read on here.What are they saying?
I'm not splitting hairs. We were 4 points off 16th place by mid November(!) the season Ole got sacked.I think you're splitting hairs here to try and create a distinction between the two.
Getting battered by Bournemouth at home vs getting battered by Watford away.
Is there really any difference? A big enough difference to say one guy should get sacked and another should stay a bit longer?
With Ole he got beat by 13th placed Leicester 4-2, Liverpool 5-0 and Watford 4-1. He started the season well getting 4 wins in the opening 5 (the other being a draw).
It was a small slump in form that got him sacked. We were abject during that small period. ETHs bad form has been for 83 games.
'Not going great'? Slight understatement there, don't you think? Literally the worst form in our PL history, by a long way. Much worse than what Rangnick did, much worse than Ole when he got fired, much worse than Mourinho when he got fired.But it worked for the first season when he exceeded expectation.
Have we now become a club that sacks a manager as soon as it is not going great....I would like to think we are better than that.
What slight improvement?He has fooled a lot of fans into thinking we are making progress this season with how we have played in spells during certain matches this season but they forget that is based on comparing how low he took us last season, a slight improvement on last season should not be deemed acceptable.
we should be seeing a big improvement because there are no excuses like he tried to use last season to cover up his abysmal coaching from last season.
Ole was 1 game away from finishing 5th on the final day of the season when he was 1.5 seasons in. Would have probably been sacked. Same goes for Ten Hag had he not won the FA cup too.I'd argue that Ole went through some dire patches before that, and could have gotten the sack. Particularly before Bruno was brought in. However I agree, we've been horrendous for the guts of 83 games, and I can't even remember the last time he's strung three wins together on the bounce in the league. Has he ever, actually?
Evans and Maguire at centre back vs Villa sounds like a resigination letter.
Didn't he also sign Evans?Starting Maguire and Evans over his own signings in Martinez and DeLigt is basically him admitting he doesn't know how to fix his own defence.
Desperate stuff.