There's been a lot less news in general around the club. Usually in the transfer window we get linked to 100s of players. This window we were linked to only really the ones we actually were after.When a managers on the verge of being sacked we normally see a lot more news about it don’t we? Unless it all comes down to the result on Sunday and it just suddenly happens on Monday morning. I remember the week leading up to Ole and LVG sacking. Was a lot of people on it.
Does anyone think he won't be sacked if we lose to Villa?
They were happy enough with last season, and they even rewarded him with another year triggered on his contract already. We haven’t really been worse this season than last year so I can see why they are happy to continue with him now.They made a decision you disagreed with. That doesn't mean they aren't without any ambition and that they are happy for low standards throughout the season
Yeah I think he stays at very least until Christmas and probably end of season regardless of results.
They weren't happy enough with last season, they went into the market to see what alternatives there were. Tuchel broke down because he seemingly wanted full control.They were happy enough with last season, and they even rewarded him with another year triggered on his contract already. We haven’t really been worse this season than last year so I can see why they are happy to continue with him now.
So the leaks have stopped a bit more then?There's been a lot less news in general around the club. Usually in the transfer window we get linked to 100s of players. This window we were linked to only really the ones we actually were after.
They were happy enough with last season, and they even rewarded him with another year triggered on his contract already. We haven’t really been worse this season than last year so I can see why they are happy to continue with him now.
I think if we get Tuchel in next week, he’ll win at least 1 trophy this season probably the Europa. But I don’t think he’s the long term solution.
I wouldnt cite the new contract as a 'reward'. It was easier to demonstrate a togetherness with a year extension and we are unaware of certain terms that may make a break clause easier than before.They were happy enough with last season, and they even rewarded him with another year triggered on his contract already. We haven’t really been worse this season than last year so I can see why they are happy to continue with him now.
There’s a lot wrong with it actually. We’d rather not restart every 2 years and if we are having to change managers every 1/2 years then that means we’ve obviously failed. The fact managers can stay in jobs for 8/9 years shows they’ve been successful.I think we need to stop thinking of managers in the long term. In the modern age even the likes of Klopp or Pep being in one job for 8-9 years is very rare. You hire a manager to get you to the next stage you are looking to get to (top 4, challenge for title or win title) if he gets you there great if he doesn't then you get someone else and try again.
There's nothing wrong with having a succession of managers who are only here for 1-2 year stints.
Yet no improvement and we are still here with him in charge. I think they simply bought into his long term project thing.They weren't happy enough with last season, they went into the market to see what alternatives there were. Tuchel broke down because he seemingly wanted full control.
In any case - they settled for the Ten Hag project quite plausibly under the condition that he shows immediate improvement - or else they would make a change.
I’m not. I genuinely believe they are going to show patience, regardless of how much fans seem to almost unanimously hate the idea of him managing us. He’d be gone after Spurs game if they have any intention of binning him, we won’t play worse than that.I can see you're trolling again
I think he has a clause in his contract team performance based .. they don't want to just pay 17M for firing him..Whilst results always play a factor in these things, I would say that the decision to sack him or not is much more nuanced than many have made out. If it was purely results based, he’d be gone already. I would imagine there is a constant state of feedback between coaching staff and upper management, as well as Wilcox observing training sessions. They also all watch the matches and see how that translates into the field.
The tactical plan of the team will have been laid out and discussed in great detail and I would say progress towards that is the defining KPI by which his ongoing employment is judged. The fact we are leaking goals for fun and showing such a lack of coherent strategy on the pitch is more damning than the results, from Ineos’ perspective. I think they were fully prepared for bumps in the road this season and a potential failure to qualify for the CL, if there was a clear evolution on the pitch and the development of a distinctive style with a positive trajectory in performances. However, that resolve has to be being tested by the egregiously low levels of performance to date, even in victory we’ve looked quite poor and performance levels are heading in the wrong direction.
His tactics at Ajax was basically how Ajax want to play regardless of who the manager is.My biggest question regarding his reign is and will be; what happened with his tactics and style from Ajax? He got a job based on that and was highly rated 2 years ago because of that.
in United he looked as completely different manager.
You're impatient. There are credible leaks that he's on thin ice. They aren't without basis.Yet no improvement and we are still here with him in charge. I think they simply bought into his long term project thing.
I’m not. I genuinely believe they are going to show patience, regardless of how much fans seem to almost unanimously hate the idea of him managing us. He’d be gone after Spurs game if they have any intention of binning him, we won’t play worse than that.
Yeah he’s being given ‘games to save his job’. They obviously can’t fire him if we get a result at Villa, and we will probably snatch a draw or at least not get beaten as heavily as we did against Spurs which will just make it more difficult for them to pull the trigger. If they genuinely wanted to fire him then they had their chance.You're impatient. There are credible leaks that he's on thin ice. They aren't without basis.
As I said - there are a few other decisions that show they have big ambition for the club, so to insinuate they are simply unambitious ditherers is premature and probably unfair.
This I feel is the main reason. Its easy to say "anyone" would be better than what Eth is serving up, but it feels like we would rather get a good permanent replacement than an average interim.I don’t think the papers know what they’re talking about; the Villa match likely has little bearing on our decision to stick with Erik. It might be that behind the scenes they genuinely feel the new players and staff need time to adjust, or maybe they’re simply still trying to source a promising replacement.
Keeping him and allowing the new structure and players to bed in is a better option than an interim.This I feel is the main reason. Its easy to say "anyone" would be better than what Eth is serving up, but it feels like we would rather get a good permanent replacement than an average interim.
They won't remain patient with him. He's gone in my opinion. Think it's pretty clear to me.
There’s a lot wrong with it actually. We’d rather not restart every 2 years and if we are having to change managers every 1/2 years then that means we’ve obviously failed. The fact managers can stay in jobs for 8/9 years shows they’ve been successful.
That risks us realistically finishing in the bottom places on the table with zero kind of continental footballKeeping him and allowing the new structure and players to bed in is a better option than an interim.
Simon stone answered a question on the BBC earlier about the cost of sacking him and he pointed out that it’s approximately a £3m loss for each position down in the table that a team finishes.I think he has a clause in his contract team performance based .. they don't want to just pay 17M for firing him..
Failed on all counts.How do we judge a manager? I would suggest some of the criterias are....
Tactics - of which ETH's are baffling and at times non existent.
Results - Dreadful season last year. Historically bad CL group campaign and an 8th place finish. Numerous thrashings from teams up and down the down the league. From two convincing losses against City to losing 0-3 at home to Bournemouth and 4-0 away at Palace.
Substitutions - again, bizarre at at times. Rashford getting hooked last night was the latest. When have we seen a change that really changed to pattern of the game? And im not talking about throwing on McSauce in extra time when a couple of goals are needed.
Communication with the fans and media - often nonsensical stuff we hear from him post game. Last night gaslighting us about last season being a success because we won the FA Cup.
Signings - Rotten. Is there any player that ETH has signed that would get into the first XI at City, Liverpool or Arsenal?
Progress of players - Have we seen a player really develop under Ten Hag's tutelage? Mainoo and Garnacho have been great, but they always were going to be. Is there a player that was here prior that has really improved his game? Maybe Dallot in patches, but now he he been chucked over to left back and looks terrible.
Relationship with players - Feels like it has soured. Fall outs with Sancho. Dumping DDH. Stripping McGuire of the captaincy and not being able to get him out. All these things add up over time.
I really don't see any redeeming features in ETH or any reason why we should continue down this path.
As fans, I think we like the idea of Ten Hag. We like this idea of a progressive modern tracksuit manager / coach, who did well with Ajax and who doesn't take any shit. But the reality is, he's not that.
That risks us realistically finishing in the bottom places on the table with zero kind of continental football