He came on didn't he? He came on, shoving Bruno on to the wing to accommodate him. Why bring him on when he offers nothing? Why not bring on Pellistri and leave Bruno where he is? Thats what i mean. He just keeps giving Wout minutes for nothing.
He's been fine for his first season considering he didnt have much of a pre-season and was injured. He has contributed some big goals this year.
Of course you can. Competently run clubs don't expect the manager to dictate transfer activity.
1. He got fired for sexual misconduct
2. He recently had a stroke
Edit: Those two are not related
Amen to that. It shows the oversaturation somehow that good seemingly isn't seen positive anymore.
Fully agree. Was questioned about my system that produced the same rating. 6 of 10 is fantastic in my book, more than that usually indicates a freak season or something unsustainable. If we could establish our club our club on a stable 6 out 10 level, I'd be happy. We have a lot to do still - years with the last coaches meant we missed a lot of time working on things that are seemingly now bread and butter, I'd argue that at least half of Bundesliga or Ligue Un Teams can produce a more effective press than we do - thats how far we are in behind, lets catch up first before we talk about wonders and needing only the best of the best players because only those are able to improve us.
Yeah because knee-jerk short-termism is clearly the way to success...
We finished 6th last year. Of course we are miles off. Even the sides who are there took a long time of strong work to get there. To think we can flick a switch and do it is crazy. Arsenal took 4 years to come 2nd.
The other week people criticised bringing Pellistri on as well. No matter what the sub is, if the result is bad people will whine. And if the result is good, they most likely wont. People are saying subs are shit but Fred was one we all would have made to give us legs.
Sabitzer isn’t even a CM. Would leave our engine room weak. He’s busy masquerading as a forward in most games. Eriksen lost his legs and since when has he been a good pressed never mind ‘from the front’. Fred is the best pressed we have, bar none.
I didn't say sack him but if United manages to screw up top 4 from this position then wouldn't you think some sort of evaluation is atleast warranted .
You say this every week seemingly desperate for it to happen. We aren’t messing it up. We will finish in the top 4.
You are confusing me with some one else I haven't even once predicted United not making top 4 comfortably .
There isn't a sane person praising Wout introduced as a sub.
So all the criticism about his subs is about Wout? He rates him as a potential impact player to do what he did vs Argentina (changed the game big time). I don’t agree with Wout as a footballer but that’s his thing. That aside his subs are mostly good. People have issue with Pellistri, Fred etc based on which way the wind blows. It’s just the nature of the “quick, find someone to blame ” Internet mentality.
He does get plenty of praise (as he should) to be fair. It’s just that the criticisms are often just people being frustrated and not having a point to make.
I know it's mine, it's one monumentally stupid decision that ETH keeps making. What he did vs Argentina is an outlier, we've had enough material at Utd to see he's completely useless at everything and shockingly in the air too.
I actually thought he played the role quite well when we went on a run (including va Barcelona) so it’s not quite lunacy but I agree that it’s not producing and should stop. I just don’t believe it’s multiple subs like we read here every week, which seems to have become an easy go to for some fans - his subs cost us the game etc I mean why analyse what goes wrong when you can just pin it on subs or mentality or bottle?
Well evaluation is always needed, even in good times. But I want ETH to be given time and proper backing.
