sepulturite
Full Member
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2014
- Messages
- 3,119
Jesus give it a rest some of ye in here are unbelievable.Yet another win papering over the cracks against a no name team and somehow its alright because it's just 8 games.
Jesus give it a rest some of ye in here are unbelievable.Yet another win papering over the cracks against a no name team and somehow its alright because it's just 8 games.
Do you expect change at the flip of a switch, because it sure seems like it.
Did he? I think they've gone backways this season, and I wasn't overly impressed with them last season.Other clubs manage it pretty well. Conte at Spurs changed them pretty bloody quickly.
Did he? I remember for a large time under Conte they were shit but getting results. Towards the end of the season they started to look better, but so far this season they seem to be getting results but not exactly the performances to go with it. If anyone here expects Ten Hag to make us play like Ajax in the space of a few months, he's smoking somethingOther clubs manage it pretty well. Conte at Spurs changed them pretty bloody quickly.
Yet another win papering over the cracks against a no name team and somehow its alright because it's just 8 games.
I'm curious as to how your square these two stances.When can we expect changes?
If fans see difference between this season and our past seasons, good for them. Genuinely, I don't.
I have been optimistic about every managerial change in the past only to see how much of a false dawn it was.
So it's not unreasonable in being cautious in judging a manager. Can you tell me why is it going to be different this time?
If you can't see a difference in the way the team pass and move the ball this season compared to last season there's no hope for you. We're about 10 games in having played Liverpool, Arsenal, and Man City, so obviously we've had to be pragmatic at times. Still, I can't believe anyone could watch us at the moment and think there's no difference between this and Ole ball. Very weird.When can we expect changes?
If fans see difference between this season and our past seasons, good for them. Genuinely, I don't.
I have been optimistic about every managerial change in the past only to see how much of a false dawn it was.
So it's not unreasonable in being cautious in judging a manager. Can you tell me why is it going to be different this time?
I'm curious as to how your square these two stances.
I'm firmly in the "I have no idea how it's going" camp, but surely if you're being cautious in judging a manager "it's just 8 games" is exactly the thing you would be saying because there's not a lot you can draw from 8 games either way, yet you're deriding people for making that statement? I am just curious as to how you don't see that as inconsistent logic.
It seems to me that if you don't think a manager can be judged in 8 games then you shouldn't really be criticising him in that period either, because by definition there are things that he simply hasn't had time to change or knowledge to gain? You can see how using evocative language like "papering over the cracks" (how would you tell that's whats happening after only 8 games?) and then advocating for patience is a bit pulling in both directions.Fans feel the manager shouldn't be criticized because it's just been 8 games. To me criticism of performances doesn't equate to judgement or calling him to be sacked.
Thank you for clarifying that. I thought I was losing my mind seeing all the negativity here. Did some people expect Messi’s tiki-Taka the first season or what? We’re miles better than all previous seasons.If you can't see a difference in the way the team pass and move the ball this season compared to last season there's no hope for you. We're about 10 games in having played Liverpool, Arsenal, and Man City, so obviously we've had to be pragmatic at times. Still, I can't believe anyone could watch us at the moment and think there's no difference between this and Ole ball. Very weird.
I'd also love to know who you wanted us to get, seeing as you're unhappy about ten Hag's 'unproven' credentials.
Scholes and Hargreaves still think he should fecking start Sunday!!!
In previous seasons we don't score 3 goals against mancity at the Etihad after going four down in the first half. We would totally collapse. That alone points to a shift in mentality albeit a very minute one.If fans see difference between this season and our past seasons, good for them. Genuinely, I don't.
I've yet to hear exactly what to expect from an ETH team from the hundreds of posters that convinced us all he was the right option. The ideas about what type of football to expect are inconsistent depending who you ask.
His style of play is very much possession orientated with creating a lot of chances. Not quite Pep style but probably the most comparable at the top levels at the moment. I assure you he isn't happy with the performances so far, probably even the wins against Pool and Arsenal but this is the players he has to do with at the moment. Also I fully expect things to get better as he has more time to coach the players. For instance Sancho is someone who should fit his style but he hasn't shown enough yet.
What ETH wants most is a team that can go away to City and play the same style as they do against Forest at home. This will take proper time, just like it took Pep time even though he walked into a much better squad of players.
I think people don't really understand ETH's style of play. They seem to think he's Pep and expect our play to resemble that style. Ajax did not play like City under ETH. They valued possession far less and actually played a lot of long balls. They had good passages of one touch football, but that was where the similarities pretty much ended.
In previous seasons we don't score 3 goals against mancity at the Etihad after going four down in the first half. We would totally collapse. That alone points to a shift in mentality albeit a very minute one.
We scored 2 meaningless goals in the last few minutes after the result became 6-1 and City stopped playing. Are you seriously considering this as a positive?
We totally collapsed, indeed.
The more I watch us, the more I think we need to just fire-sale pretty much everyone who’s been here longer than a couple years. There’s something that’s always festered in the squad regardless of manager. We see a rare glimpse of a team with some fire, such as the Liverpool game, but its usually short lived.
agreed. some of our players seemed to have been absorbed into certain "chicken" loser mentality content with mediocrity and sh&t themselves when there is pressure. Lindelof, De Gea, Shaw are great examples of players plagued by such mentality.
To add to your post regarding Guardiola, he took over from Pellegrini who had finished 4th before departing the club and Guardiola could only match Pellegrini's 4th place finish in his first season at the club after spending over £200m. And in his second season, the City owners backed him with £300m and he had spent £500m in his first two seasons at the club.In previous seasons we don't score 3 goals against mancity at the Etihad after going four down in the first half. We would totally collapse. That alone points to a shift in mentality albeit a very minute one.
You wanted to see massive changes after 8 games but in reality it just doesn't happen. Mancity were already winning titles when Pep became manager yet he struggled to make top 4 in his first season. It took Klopp 3years to start implementing his ideas fully in the Liverpool team. Just few months ago we were making fun of Arteta in thid forum.
Players don't just change over night because of habit. It's difficult to change habit. Players like Bruno won't stop being compulsive on the ball after 3months with a new manager. The team won't start making constant off the ball runs after 11 games. It just doesn't happen.
The most positive thing for me is that ETH knows this and thus unlike LVG has decided to adopt his philosophy to suit the current players. He knows this isn't going to be a quick thing hence has decided to make changes gradually.
We all said he will need a lot of time. Seems for a lot of people, they just can't handle it.
We have a frankenstein team with so many players that can't play a possession game with any intensity without wasting so many passes.
He's 13 or so games into a new club that needs a lot of work.
Some of you here simply don't understand how difficult a task he has on his hands.
In previous seasons we don't score 3 goals against mancity at the Etihad after going four down in the first half. We would totally collapse. That alone points to a shift in mentality albeit a very minute one.
You wanted to see massive changes after 8 games but in reality it just doesn't happen. Mancity were already winning titles when Pep became manager yet he struggled to make top 4 in his first season. It took Klopp 3years to start implementing his ideas fully in the Liverpool team. Just few months ago we were making fun of Arteta in thid forum.
Players don't just change over night because of habit. It's difficult to change habit. Players like Bruno won't stop being compulsive on the ball after 3months with a new manager. The team won't start making constant off the ball runs after 11 games. It just doesn't happen.
The most positive thing for me is that ETH knows this and thus unlike LVG has decided to adopt his philosophy to suit the current players. He knows this isn't going to be a quick thing hence has decided to make changes gradually.
You do, but last season you even lost that, and in the end that was a big part of why Ole had to go. United conceded far too many goals under him, but as long as the skill and self-belief was there to turn it around, results were ok.That is just not true. We had a record for coming back from losing positions to win games under Ole if I remember correctly.
You do, but last season you even lost that, and in the end that was a big part of why Ole had to go. United conceded far too many goals under him, but as long as the skill and self-belief was there to turn it around, results were ok.
Agreed. He's only been here five minutes; it's going to take time for any manager to turn this squad around. ETH has identified the weaknesses we have been talking about for ages, namely the defence and central midfield, and has acted there. That's a huge positive. It's clear that confidence is very fragile at the moment, and we are capable of conceding a goal at any moment. This first season has to be about building the foundations for future success, and at times it won't be pretty. We have to allow ETH to do his work, and we must accept there will be short term problems. He has a huge job on his hands.We could finish 8th and I’d still back him. Sick of the managerial circus. Lets stick with one guy and see what happens.
Scholes and Hargreaves still think he should fecking start Sunday!!!
Yes, there is no quick fix. And I feel like United currently is on a similar level in regard to results and how games go as in the better times under Ole. Which isn't good enough in the long run, but definitely an improvement on Ole's later matches, so the direction is right but it will take time.Yeah but I think Ole became a scapegoat for a terrible season and squad building. Don't get me wrong Ole deserved the sack by playing favorites and not being willing to drop underperforming players, but I don't think Ole was the sole reason for our bad season. And I don't expect any manager to be able to fix this situation quickly.
However at the end of that day - I was the happiest as a United fan from Jan 2020 when we signed Bruno til the end of 2021 season since Fergie. And I'm very pessimistic about us getting back to that level for a long time - even if we got Pep or Klopp as our manager.
I think people don't really understand ETH's style of play. They seem to think he's Pep and expect our play to resemble that style. Ajax did not play like City under ETH. They valued possession far less and actually played a lot of long balls. They had good passages of one touch football, but that was where the similarities pretty much ended.
If people actually try and see us for what we are, they will notice that we HAVE actually changed the way we play.
1. We build up with the players at the back. We have been moving the ball far better in this area of the pitch and today we did that really well again.
2. Our full backs have done well in supporting the build up play, allowing us to get to the final third far easier than we used to.
3. We play in clusters. Like Ajax, our attackers have many passages of play where they are close together and can play quick passes due to this. This has happened both on the flanks leading to an overlap and through the middle.
4. We are also defending far better in these clusters and as a result, have been far more compact than we have been in the past. Barring the City game, this has been a constant theme since our Bournemouth loss.
Right now we have two issues we have struggled with.
1. despite moving the ball up the pitch, we could still be quicker. This is getting better each game and I suspect with Casemiro getting into the eleven, will be something that becomes more fluid.
2. We have struggled to connect with our forward line. I believe this is actually an issue with our attackers, moreso than a tactical issue. I believe certain personnel have been responsible for this lack of connection. Ronaldo and Sancho are not getting into games. They are not playing with the intensity to win individual duels or make penetrative runs and are therefore not holding the ball in their area of the pitch well enough or widening the attacking area of the pitch. It makes it pretty difficult for our creative players like Bruno or Eriksen to play effective balls and has been why we haven't been bombarding teams with a plethora of clear cut chances. In addition, their lack of intensity is also evident in the press and has affected our ability to win the ball back as early as we would like to. Ronaldo is 37 and doesn't have the legs to sustain runs or win duels as effectively. I have also never liked him playing as a lone striker as I don't think he really knows how to play the role effectively outside of being a great goalscorer. Sancho needs to get himself much fitter. If he is not careful, he may never become a permanent fixture in the team moving forward. I feel both of these players coming in and playing a major part in our season affected us in these areas last season and are what are holding our attack back this season.
This is absolutely spot on.I think people don't really understand ETH's style of play. They seem to think he's Pep and expect our play to resemble that style. Ajax did not play like City under ETH. They valued possession far less and actually played a lot of long balls. They had good passages of one touch football, but that was where the similarities pretty much ended.
If people actually try and see us for what we are, they will notice that we HAVE actually changed the way we play.
1. We build up with the players at the back. We have been moving the ball far better in this area of the pitch and today we did that really well again.
2. Our full backs have done well in supporting the build up play, allowing us to get to the final third far easier than we used to.
3. We play in clusters. Like Ajax, our attackers have many passages of play where they are close together and can play quick passes due to this. This has happened both on the flanks leading to an overlap and through the middle.
4. We are also defending far better in these clusters and as a result, have been far more compact than we have been in the past. Barring the City game, this has been a constant theme since our Bournemouth loss.
Right now we have two issues we have struggled with.
1. despite moving the ball up the pitch, we could still be quicker. This is getting better each game and I suspect with Casemiro getting into the eleven, will be something that becomes more fluid.
2. We have struggled to connect with our forward line. I believe this is actually an issue with our attackers, moreso than a tactical issue. I believe certain personnel have been responsible for this lack of connection. Ronaldo and Sancho are not getting into games. They are not playing with the intensity to win individual duels or make penetrative runs and are therefore not holding the ball in their area of the pitch well enough or widening the attacking area of the pitch. It makes it pretty difficult for our creative players like Bruno or Eriksen to play effective balls and has been why we haven't been bombarding teams with a plethora of clear cut chances. In addition, their lack of intensity is also evident in the press and has affected our ability to win the ball back as early as we would like to. Ronaldo is 37 and doesn't have the legs to sustain runs or win duels as effectively. I have also never liked him playing as a lone striker as I don't think he really knows how to play the role effectively outside of being a great goalscorer. Sancho needs to get himself much fitter. If he is not careful, he may never become a permanent fixture in the team moving forward. I feel both of these players coming in and playing a major part in our season affected us in these areas last season and are what are holding our attack back this season.