Erik ten Hag | 2022/23 & 2023/24

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'd be surprised if he was a step slower. I think that it's a more a case of having more distance to cover and facing opponents that have better head starts.
Very possible, I just see him miss tackles and interceptions that he seemed to get to 18 months ago for us. Either way it's obvious he's not Madrid Casemiro and it's suicide just leaving him to cover the entire width of the pitch on his own like prime Kante.
 
This journalist knows feck all.

Not saying it wont happen, but he knows feck all
It’s almost as if every journalist “knows feck all” - but as soon as it’s perceived bad news it’s believed

At this rate, we’re at the risk of claiming every journalist who goes through years of training is just making up bollocks. It’s a terrible view to take
 
Your job is to back up your statement that we have great options in attack and midfield.

Effectively Bruno is the only senior attacking player who has performed at a level needed to do any better then we are doing.

Garnacho is in his breakout season and is playing so much because there are no other options.

Rashford has been off the boil all season , not sure you can Blame ETH for him going out on the piss, but he’s just not mentally right. Who is the wonderful attacking alternative to Rash ? Amad? Another player who is not used the EPL.

Hoijland joined injured and is also in a break out season in the EPL.

So that’s two forwards who are in their first proper season and a senior player whose form fell off a cliff. That’s 3 of our 4 most played , attacking players.

Where are all these attacking options you are talking about ? What other top teams are relying on players out of form or really having their first proper season in the league ?
Even in midfield we really need Mainoo, another player in their breakout season in the EPL. Casemiro, like Rashford , has looked like he’s tapped out. Two of our best performers in CM and attack from that season have effectively been redundant this season. So who are all the quality options available to ETH?


Implying ETH has a squad of top quality forward players is bollox. And don’t give me “but Anthony” sh*t, one bad signing shouldn’t be this much of a problem, a lot of you over play that card.

That’s not even looking at Defence which has been decimated all season.


There are good and fair criticisms of ETH and reasons for people to want him sacked, but implying he has a really strong squad of options this season is bollox.

Rashford was out top scorers last season, and has been available all of this season pretty much. If Ten Hag can't get him focused and performing for a full season then that is on him.

Bruno is Bruno. Plays every game, gives 100%. Best creator in the league and chips in with goals.

Garnacho has been great for us and would walk into most teams. Even the better teams would be giving him game time.

These are the options he chose to come into the season with, along with Hojlund and Antony. All have been available for a large number of games, so he's not done too bad in that regards. If Bruno had ever got injured then we'd have seen a real issue for him, because he is everything to this team. Without him there are no ideas at all through the way we play. Much like under Ole, Bruno is the brains of the team, because we don't play in a way to overwhelm opposition as a unit. It's just shit house long balls over the top and whip crosses in.

In midfield he's signed Eriksen, Casemiro, Amrabat and Mount, and has been lucky enough to have a top level talent come through the ranks in Mainoo. These have been supplemented with McTominay who has chipped in with goals and was wanted by West Ham, who are just below us in the table. Between all of them, I believe he could have put something together that worked.

Defensively we've had issues with injuries, but I believe that the likes of Maguire have performed well enough when relied upon. In fact, Dalot and Maguire have probably been amongst our best players this season. He also allowed Reguilon to leave, who I felt was doing a solid job at LB and has done well at Brentford, notching 4 assists in 12 and getting praise for his performances. Again, that's on the manager.

And the Antony thing is a bit of a joke no matter how you frame it. He worked with the guy for 2 years. You say Garnacho has played so much because "there are no other options", well what about his £80m signing that he recently said will be unstoppable for defences? Since he said that quote he's barely played the guy, instead benching him. If he truly believes he'll be that good then why isn't he tapping into that potential? Again, that's on the manager.
 
It’s almost as if every journalist “knows feck all” - but as soon as it’s perceived bad news it’s believed

At this rate, we’re at the risk of claiming every journalist who goes through years of training is just making up bollocks. It’s a terrible view to take
Er no, Mark Ogden (who first lined Southgate to United) said ten hag would be given one more season. Then we had a load of posts saying he knew feck all too.
 
Erik's position is untenable if the club has any viable professional standards let alone ambition. It's almost impossible to predict what he's building towards when assessing how disconcerted the team is tactically over consecutive months. Giving the manager another year with further spend will just foster more instability in the competitiveness of the club over the coming year.

If there was any iota of capability to change things it would have been evident beyond the first game of the season, where the parameters for the seasons failures were demonstrable with the gaping holes in midfield. Erik's demise is not due to player contention, injuries or lacking charisma but the aversion to adapt.

Pep fundamentally has the same philosophy as a manager but independently assessing his tenure at city, there have been nuances in how he has differentiated his approach through different seasons. It's why for a period of time John Stones likely was considered a below-par signing for them but the moment a change of shape accommodates his position of playing into the midfield the player comes of age. I can't think of one significant example where any United player under Erik's supervision has demonstrated incremental improvement from a systemic application outside of sporadic individual brilliance which has become a hallmark of the failed managers this past decade.

To persist with the manager is the club hanging their hat on mediocrity and a massive blot against INEOS imo.
 
It's not about handling it, it's about respect. Sir Alex did it many times. Getting disrespected and doing nothing about it looks weak. People have this belief that putting up with disrespect somehow makes you a strong person. Ironically that's the weakest thing a person can do. People only tell you that putting up with disrespect is strong so they can continue to disrespect you.

Fergie deserved respect. Totally different to this clown that only deserves the boot.
 
Also linked by Gazetta (at the bottom), hopefully we are looking at him


I think the minute we see mitten/ogden/Dawson/Whitwell give some info, it would be more credible.

Italian journalists would have no clue what INEOS are planning.
 
I think the minute we see mitten/ogden/Dawson/Whitwell give some info, it would be more credible.

Italian journalists would have no clue what INEOS are planning.
I'm just happy/hoping they aren't just sitting on their arses looking at only Southgate and Potter.
 
Very possible, I just see him miss tackles and interceptions that he seemed to get to 18 months ago for us. Either way it's obvious he's not Madrid Casemiro and it's suicide just leaving him to cover the entire width of the pitch on his own like prime Kante.

Madrid's Casemiro was used differently, he was what call in France a water-carrier, he played between the defense and other midfielders and defended going forward. The way we have used him reminds me of Kroos-Modric playing as double pivot in a 4231, it made them look terrible and completely off especially in transition.

And as you said he isn't Kanté, Kanté is a box to box with incredible stamina and agility who thrives in transition going both ways. Casemiro has never been a player that runs from one extreme to the other the way he has been used for more than a year. Also Casemiro isn't a small player, players of his stature are generally not running around.
 
It's not meant to defend ETH but since he came back from injury, Diallo has made me think that if he was fit at the start of the season, the shape of the team and plans of ETH could have been different. I think that Diallo is the kind of wide midfielder that helps you a lot in possession and he could impose himself in a similar way that Mainoo did.

Can't say Diallo is setting the world alight.

Like Antony, Diallo is doing ok: he tracks back, can keep the ball quite well, has an pretty decent shot, drifts inside alot.

I do think Diallo needs to play more. In my books it's a toss up between Antony or Diallo who plays on the right imo.
 
I think the minute we see mitten/ogden/Dawson/Whitwell give some info, it would be more credible.

Italian journalists would have no clue what INEOS are planning.
I think there has to be something in these rumours tbh. The fact that there have been some reports in Germany, that we've had talks with Tuchel and now reports in Italy saying we're interested in Motta. There was also that French report about Zidane.

Whether it's just sounding out potential managers or something more serious remains to be seen but I'd be very surprised with the current management of the club if we didn't start doing the groundwork on candidates from now.
 
Er no, Mark Ogden (who first lined Southgate to United) said ten hag would be given one more season. Then we had a load of posts saying he knew feck all too.
Exactly , so we all dismiss “good news” as bullshit.

“Good news” in the sense that EtH getting sacked.
 
I think there has to be something in these rumours tbh. The fact that there have been some reports in Germany, that we've had talks with Tuchel and now reports in Italy saying we're interested in Motta. There was also that French report about Zidane.

Whether it's just sounding out potential managers or something more serious remains to be seen but I'd be very surprised with the current management of the club if we didn't start doing the groundwork on candidates from now.
Not at all. The tuchel circulation was very obvious. His mouth piece coming out via German outlets (Jose did the same thing following his Roma sack).

Its broadly bollocks unless sourced close to the club report it. The only thing I saw genuine (worryingly) was the Southgate consideration.
 
73.5% voted don't want to give ETH another season and rightly so. No manager should survive if we failed to get Top 4. No ifs and buts especially after spending 400 fecking millions.

He was also fully backed with signing of his ex players or players he was familiar with from Eredivisie. He can't give us the BS now that he doesn't have the players to play his style of football.
 
Not at all. The tuchel circulation was very obvious. His mouth piece coming out via German outlets (Jose did the same thing following his Roma sack).

Its broadly bollocks unless sourced close to the club report it. The only thing I saw genuine (worryingly) was the Southgate consideration.

I wonder if Jose will rock up in Munich. That would be an eye-opener.
 
He is going.

The statistics and performances on the pitch aren’t good enough for a team like Everton let alone a team like United.

Tactically we have been absolutely horrendous and the fact we have any points on the board are despite him not because of him.

Huge gaping holes in midfield, no connection from defence and attack, inability to break down simple defensive structures and the instance on playing favourites who are not performing have all been common themes this year.

He has a ready made excuse in the injuries but no manager is that unlucky and there is a process or methodology that has led to those injuries that is simply not working and is actively harming players careers and reputations. If it is the medical staff La fault then it is the managers lack of understanding/ control of the situation that has led to the crisis.

but even then when he has his starting 11 or close to he is unable to coach them into a shape or style that is coherent and effective.

He has spent more money than any manager we have had and on baffling players like Anthony , Onana, Mount, Martinez and 75m on Hojlund it is gross incompetence of the highest order.

Now thing about INEOS who are cutting costs , looking at marginal gains, resetting the culture and looking at how the head coach implements a game plan and executes it. Then communication to the squad for the coach and the decisions the coaches make. He has failed in every regard and has been shown to be completely out of his depth.

They know this, we know this, it’s just stubbornesss keeping him and a fresh slate is best for all involved and that is indeed what will happen.

He’s gone no matter what.
 
Ogden's article was actually the strongest hint so far that he'll be leaving. Because he was the first journo I think to mention the 25% paycut.

Which both explains why the club are holding fire on sacking him, and why it'd be even more stupid for him to stay without a new contract from a financial point of view, millionaire family or not.
 
Ogden's article was actually the strongest hint so far that he'll be leaving. Because he was the first journo I think to mention the 25% paycut.

Which both explains why the club are holding fire on sacking him, and why it'd be even more stupid for him to stay without a new contract from a financial point of view, millionaire family or not.
Yes there’s this also
Even before I was informed of any agreement common sense indicated he was off.

Before INEOS came in and the head guys there was talk of new contracts , now it’s completely dead in the water and the final nail is the CL , miss out on it and you pay him a quarter less and only one year no less.

What's he on per year? 12m? So he’s likely getting a 8m payout which is peanuts compared to past managers we have had.

He would have been offered a new deal in Jan if he was staying to rebuild.
 
I think it's obvious that ETH will be leaving end of the season. Negative style of play or no style of play, wasted 400M on dross, failed to get Top 4, got absolutely shafted in CL. Each of the 4 major reasons above is a stackable offence on its own.
 
Yes there’s this also
Even before I was informed of any agreement common sense indicated he was off.

Before INEOS came in and the head guys there was talk of new contracts , now it’s completely dead in the water and the final nail is the CL , miss out on it and you pay him a quarter less and only one year no less.

What's he on per year? 12m? So he’s likely getting a 8m payout which is peanuts compared to past managers we have had.

He would have been offered a new deal in Jan if he was staying to rebuild.

£9m down to £6.75m

Just his pride alone should stop him hanging around earning that when Pep is on £20m. Poch and Arteta both earn around £10m.

If he'd done the bear minimum as United manager he'd have been given at least 1-2 year extension months ago, with a salary bump, or at least the 25% reduction wiped out.
 
£9m down to £6.75m

Just his pride alone should stop him hanging around earning that when Pep is on £20m. Poch and Arteta both earn around £10m.

If he'd even done the bear minimum as United manager he'd have probably had at least 1-2 year extension with a salary bump, or at least the 25% reduction wiped out.
Yeah so anyone doubtful and that he’ll stay is this manager getting a pay rise of 4-13m based on his performances? The answer is no
 
I think it's obvious that ETH will be leaving end of the season. Negative style of play or no style of play, wasted 400M on dross, failed to get Top 4, got absolutely shafted in CL. Each of the 4 major reasons above is a stackable offence on its own.
By his own keeper, very painful stuff
 
Erik's position is untenable if the club has any viable professional standards let alone ambition. It's almost impossible to predict what he's building towards when assessing how disconcerted the team is tactically over consecutive months. Giving the manager another year with further spend will just foster more instability in the competitiveness of the club over the coming year.

If there was any iota of capability to change things it would have been evident beyond the first game of the season, where the parameters for the seasons failures were demonstrable with the gaping holes in midfield. Erik's demise is not due to player contention, injuries or lacking charisma but the aversion to adapt.

Pep fundamentally has the same philosophy as a manager but independently assessing his tenure at city, there have been nuances in how he has differentiated his approach through different seasons. It's why for a period of time John Stones likely was considered a below-par signing for them but the moment a change of shape accommodates his position of playing into the midfield the player comes of age. I can't think of one significant example where any United player under Erik's supervision has demonstrated incremental improvement from a systemic application outside of sporadic individual brilliance which has become a hallmark of the failed managers this past decade.

To persist with the manager is the club hanging their hat on mediocrity and a massive blot against INEOS imo.

Agree. INEOS are coming in and trying to make big changes. It makes zero sense to keep ETH in place now given the rotten form this year.

We hope there will be money to spend this summer, but if Ten Hag cant make it work with players that he has hand selected, then what makes anyone think that it will be any better when he is not in charge of identifying players.

There is a milase in this squad. It makes no sense to add 3 or 4 new players in over the summer into a dressing room who seem to have lost faith in the manager.

A new atmosphere needs to be created and only a new manager can bring that.
 
I think it's obvious that ETH will be leaving end of the season. Negative style of play or no style of play, wasted 400M on dross, failed to get Top 4, got absolutely shafted in CL. Each of the 4 major reasons above is a stackable offence on its own.

Couldn't even get top 5. I know it looks like 5th place wont get CL now, but even if had, we wouldnt get it.
 
Extremely limited experience? Of having managed the most mercilessly demanding club in football and winning a bunch of trophies? Or having been a GOAT footballer who commands global respect across the game? Of course you would rather have your Pep Guardiola is my idol who has managed a couple of trophies in a farmer's league and got found out the moment he stepped outside his level. Sheesh.

Yeah because he has managed effectively one club, with whom he is intimately familiar and where he is a legend, who are fairly dominant in a league that has poor depth, a league he is extremely familiar with

I am not sure WTH you are referring to above with the "of course..." statement, I cannot wait to see the back of ETH not a fan, and TBH not sure who I would want to see replacing him, I am not a fan of Potter, Southgate or Di Zerbi either,

The OP said Zidane was the obvious answer, I am just not sure how as a manager he has shown that, I am not saying that I would be opposed to Zidane or that he would not prove to be brilliant, I would go as far as to say that Zidane would be a massive risk based on the limited scope of where he has managed

So he would be guaranteed success here? why? because he can deal with big egos? is that the problem ETH is having? don't think so, because he has experience working in different leagues, with different clubs, with different cultures... ermm!

As I say am not against Zidane but to say he is obvious answer is a massive stretch, he is an unknown anywhere barring RM
 
Status
Not open for further replies.