Leftback99
Oscar the Grouch.
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2015
- Messages
- 16,132
Where would we like our win ratio (points) to be?So where?
Where would we like our win ratio (points) to be?So where?
Points. Where do you think we should finish.Where would we like our win ratio (points) to be?
No, the emergency squad players aren't of the right profile to be able to execute that style.So the players are going against the managers instructions for the whole year?
We dominated the midfield against Liverpool though.
Unfortuately the article is not for available for me. Anyway, seems like we're on the same page here, ETH pushed for Antony, the club was reluctant at first and only got him after we entered a panick mode. Ignoring the fee, it's just shocking that a manager who worked with Antony for 2 years thought he's a PL level player.Il nip this in the bud by referring you to the latest deep dive on our summers - https://theathletic.com/5151315/202...all-news-transfers?source=user-shared-article
"Ten Hag felt he needed an additional attacker and though he had reservations about returning to Ajax, the target to gain universal agreement was Antony."
"Ten Hag undoubtedly wanted to sign Antony, but sanctioning the outlay came from above. Those with an understanding of United’s structure say several directors are involved in “checks and balances”"
Whilst acknowledging he challenged his superiors to do what's needed to sign the player, this narrative that the club weren't on the same page in wanting him is absolutely false. They could have vetoed it, but chose not to. In face they were in universal agreement to pursue him.
I dont think you got mine. Whilst acknowledging this is not an ideal approach for the interim, I'm asking what solution is better. Last season relied heavily on Licha being a mainstay at the back and Rashford being on fire for most the season. Neither of which are happening now.
Yeah that is the worry with Ten Hag. Seems like he needs world class players in world class form to play good football, otherwise our style is atrocious. This wouldn't be such a problem if he could keep Rashford playin on high level, unfortunately it seems like he just got lucky with Rash, Martinez, and Casemiro form last season.I dont think you got mine. Whilst acknowledging this is not an ideal approach for the interim, I'm asking what solution is better. Last season relied heavily on Licha being a mainstay at the back and Rashford being on fire for most the season. Neither of which are happening now.
No, that's not what happened. Athletic reported ten hag himself was hesitant to go to Ajax. They chose unanimously however that he was the player to move for. Talks stopped midway. Then restarted. Ten hag challenged his superiors to go as far as they could, and they were in agreement that Antony was the name to push for. The financial sanctioning and checks and balances were all done above ten hag. At no point was there hesitancy from Murtough on doubting him as a player for us.Unfortuately the article is not for available for me. Anyway, seems like we're on the same page here, ETH pushed for Antony, the club was reluctant at first and only got him after we entered a panick mode. Ignoring the fee, it's just shocking that a manager who worked with Antony for 2 years thought he's a PL level player.
No, he just needs the right profile. Asking to play a left back at left back isn't an outlandish need. He was ready to bin Maguire and get Todibo /Kim or whoever. That would have helped us play the higher line we need, and none of these players are world class.Yeah that is the worry with Ten Hag. Seems like he needs world class players in world class form to play good football, otherwise our style is atrocious. This wouldn't be such a problem if he could keep Rashford playin on high level, unfortunately it seems like he just got lucky with Rash, Martinez, and Casemiro form last season.
Funnily enough we are underperforming our XG for (-6.5) and massively over performing our defence (XGA +11). This would suggest that our forwards are wasteful, and sitting deep to counter wouldn't alleviate that. If anything it may well exasperate it.We could play regular 4231 this season, it's not like we generate so many chances with the high pressing anyway. And we should definitely keep using Bruno as a #10 instead of pretending he will become a more all round midfielder/#8. Lots of options, unfortunately ETH seems to have his idea of how to play football and it's not really like he's experimenting much.
There are plenty of excuses for Ten Hag this season, I mean he is the ultimate "benefit of the doubt" manager. Depending on how you take it, you might as well be very "forgiving" (as you are) or not so much (as I am). In the end, I didn't see us play good football (apart from some one-offs) since the Carabao Cup final last season, and in some of that time we had all/almost all players available. That makes me think ETH isn't the man to take us higher than just winning the games we should be winning anyway with the squad we have.No, that's not what happened. Athletic reported ten hag himself was hesitant to go to Ajax. They chose unanimously however that he was the player to move for. Talks stopped midway. Then restarted. Ten hag challenged his superiors to go as far as they could, and they were in agreement that Antony was the name to push for. The financial sanctioning and checks and balances were all done above ten hag. At no point was there hesitancy from Murtough on doubting him as a player for us.
In other words, Antony was very much a club pursuit as much as it was a managerial one.
No, he just needs the right profile. Asking to play a left back at left back isn't an outlandish need. He was ready to bin Maguire and get Todibo /Kim or whoever. That would have helped us play the higher line we need, and none of these players are world class.
Funnily enough we are underperforming our XG for (-6.5) and massively over performing our defence (XGA +11). This would suggest that our forwards are wasteful, and sitting deep to counter wouldn't alleviate that. If anything it may well exasperate it.
Coutner football is actually not sustainable over the course of a season to build a squad unless the forwards are absolutely ruthless, which his are not.
Haha. My point is we are not too far off, especially if you factor in the circumstances. Where were Pool last year?Better than 6th best in the league would be a start.
I think it easily could have been 70% without the excess of injuries we‘ve suffered.Where would we like our win ratio (points) to be?
So we would be 'easily' as good as City, Liverpool and Arsenal if we did not have a few extra injuries over average? I very much doubt it.I think it easily could have been 70% without the excess of injuries we‘ve suffered.
Not surprised you feel this way. After spending hundreds of hours on the caf, you've probably convinced yourself he's another Pep/Klopp in the making.I think it easily could have been 70% without the excess of injuries we‘ve suffered.
Some of you would deserve Southgate
I have no way of proving my theory but I truly believe that if we had had a normal share of injuries and those who weren’t out with injury played to their known normal form we would easily be snuggled in the top four. Not challenging for the PL trophy but bit that far off.
All fair assesments in my view. I am more forgiving than you, and it’s a matter of taste, belief and perspective, I guess.There are plenty of excuses for Ten Hag this season, I mean he is the ultimate "benefit of the doubt" manager. Depending on how you take it, you might as well be very "forgiving" (as you are) or not so much (as I am). In the end, I didn't see us play good football (apart from some one-offs) since the Carabao Cup final last season, and in some of that time we had all/almost all players available. That makes me think ETH isn't the man to take us higher than just winning the games we should be winning anyway with the squad we have.
He is doing not better than OK this season (considering the injuries obviously), but the style of play is terrible so I wouldn't mind if he left in the summer (I don't think it makes sense to let him go earlier).
Anyone who has two working legs can stand a few meters different. Claiming that they are unable to do that is probably the worst take I've seen all week.
Probably you mean they are unable to cover the space behind their back when they position themselves higher up, because they are too slow? That would be a fair assessment.
It comes down to the decision: Do you want more control, but be more vulnerable by fast attacks? Or do you want less control, but have a better last line of defence?
Most of the time it looks like the latter, but the fact that this often develops over the first 15min or so (as you rightly acknowledge) creates the impression for me that this isn't what EtH wants and that the CBs don't push through their fears to play the way he wants.
Maybe discipline is the wrong word, maybe it is more a lack of trust in the managers plan. Either way to me it looks like EtH isn't able to enforce the style he actually wants through full matches. Alternatively if he is fine with what is happening than I still wouldn't like it, because it destroys any possibility to really build up automatisms in how the team plays and that shows. So whichever explanation is true I don't like it.
So a better win % than Liverpool and City (Arsenal's is 71%)?I think it easily could have been 70% without the excess of injuries we‘ve suffered.
Someone should do the math, we don‘t draw a lot of games. I think we were sitting at 62% after a 100 games.So a better win % than Liverpool and City (Arsenal's is 71%)?
Basically you think we'd have been a title race with Shaw and Martinez fit for more games. Delusional.
It's true but it's hard for the club/transfer people to put a "reasonable price" threshold on a player that they never wanted and the new manager is pushing for. Especially if that manager knows the player inside out, he will get some extra credit.
In the end it's probably 80% ETH fault we ended up paying that money for Antony - and that's being generous. Imagine having 80m to spend and you still go for Antony, and then you moan about not having money for other transfers.
I think his point is more about ETH still going for high pressing line/big number of players pushing forward, what combined with deep defensive line (as you correctly stated we don't have CBs that suit high defensive line) leaves us exposed in the middle, what has been the story of the season so far and the reason we have no control whatsoever.
So ETH being stubborn with this setup results us in playing basketball games. And he doesn't seem too fussed about this what is a huge worry for me.
Would City or Pool have the status and standing they currently have if Pep or Klop didn't have the world class players they have? Their benches are full of world class players. If one falls out of form, they have another to back them up.Unfortuately the article is not for available for me. Anyway, seems like we're on the same page here, ETH pushed for Antony, the club was reluctant at first and only got him after we entered a panick mode. Ignoring the fee, it's just shocking that a manager who worked with Antony for 2 years thought he's a PL level player.
Yeah that is the worry with Ten Hag. Seems like he needs world class players in world class form to play good football, otherwise our style is atrocious. This wouldn't be such a problem if he could keep Rashford playin on high level, unfortunately it seems like he just got lucky with Rash, Martinez, and Casemiro form last season.
We could play regular 4231 this season, it's not like we generate so many chances with the high pressing anyway. And we should definitely keep using Bruno as a #10 instead of pretending he will become a more all round midfielder/#8. Lots of options, unfortunately ETH seems to have his idea of how to play football and it's not really like he's experimenting much.
Ten Hag hasn't managed 100 league games for us. The lack of draws in a small sample doesn't indicate anything in particular.Someone should do the math, we don‘t draw a lot of games. I think we were sitting at 62% after a 100 games.
Why is it bizarre? Every post I see from you on here is the same, excuses here and there any everywhere. We have been wide open all season, regardless of who was playing. Fulham was not an exception. But you seem determined to refute every argument about ETH. You go on about players not 'preferred long term solutions' for example. How many managers are given the time to realize long term solutions. I know we have suffered a lot with injuries, but multiple sources have also pointed fingers at ETH for lack of rotation, too tough preseason and training etc. But my point was that we still have a lot of very experienced players in the most expensive squad in the league. Liverpool dominated City with a make shift defense. Lindelolf may not be a left back but he is still a very experienced international defender and was captain of his country. You talk as if these players are rank amateurs.This is quite a bizzare reply. Whilst acknowledging Fulham is totally on him, this idea that we fielded internationals at the back and so should cope with city better is quite silly. I don't care if Lindelof has played 500 times for Sweden, he's still not a left back. It's astounding how this needs to be spelt out to some posters.
You are suggesting 'easily' 70% which means we would be on 20 wins at least (from 28 games). That is 5 extra wins vs what we have. We have drawn 2 games and lost 11, so in worst case scenario we would turn 2 draws into wins (+ 4 points) and 3 defeats into wins (+ 9 points), putting us on 60 points and well in the title race.Someone should do the math, we don‘t draw a lot of games. I think we were sitting at 62% after a 100 games.
Your point about our ETH being willing to die on the hill of his playing style makes no sense. He has already said he isn't trying to play the style of football ajax played and for the most of his time in charge the football has appeared pretty pragmatic and frankly dull hence the low numbers of goals we have scored. You make it sound like we have been seeing cavalier attacking football all the timeOK, but here's the rub - if he plays pragmatically with the squad he has, everyone moans that they either don't like his style or the direction he's headed, and he doesn't make any progress to where he wants to be. I actually like the fact that the hill he wants to die on is playing the style he's trying to implement. Either give him the players he needs or fire him.
Would City or Pool have the status and standing they currently have if Pep or Klop didn't have the world class players they have? Their benches are full of world class players. If one falls out of form, they have another to back them up.
I mean, even with just a tiny bit more luck and avoiding some appalling decisions from the referees, we could easily be on 10 more points at 57 at this stage, which wouldn't be that far away from a title challenge, albeit obviously very unlikely still.
The thing is - I doubt that "working on your pressing" will work this way. To get it really effective it has to be cohesive along the team. By allowing some players to drop out of the formation (the defenders by dropping deeper) you open up gaps that you usually don't want. In every pressing formation the forwards will open gaps between them that can be played through (because that's inevitable if you don't have 20 players in the first line), but the midfield and defence should position in a way that they will be at the end of these gaps and can intercept balls played through the first line. And the way it currently goes means that these interceptors are missing almost completely. So they can't get used to where to position in relation to the forwards pressing, and the forwards can't get a feeling for which gaps are ok/useful, and which are dangerous, when they leave them open.100% comes down to this. I think ETH wants the first and tries to implement it but understands we don't have the player profile for that, so is ok with the latter style of less control but better line of defense. You or I or fans may prefer more control and higher line of defense but I think ETH is ok with the later for now, while we slowly work on our pressing.
I think he is a brilliant coach, that doesn't necessarily mean his chosen way today will work out with results. But I don't think that will determine if he continues for us. I think his future with us depends on his ability to convince INEOS (with data that shows improved pressing etc) that we are on the way to implementing his vision
I’ve been ETH out for at least 3 months, however if he can secure CL football and get to another Wembley Final, I’m willing to give him one more year to prove himself, giving him time due to inheriting an inadequate squad and huge injuries issues this season, none of that however defends his abysmal loss rate this season and he should be told in no uncertain circumstances that should the club not be in the Top 3/4 after the first 12/13 PL games next season he will be replaced. At the same time if he wins the FA Cup a very difficult title to win with Coventry, Chelsea or Man City possibly still to meet, then two trophies and two CL qualification in 2 years, we start negotiating a 3 year extension to his contract at Xmas providing United are still in all competitions. He won me back with that performance against Liverpool where he proved that he can mix it with the best and has the tactical nous to make game changing decisions.
Lets be clear here we’ve played well in maybe 3 to 4 games this season and only in spells, not once have we dominated anybody for a full 90 minutes, however his indomitable will is a trait I can get behind, providing he stops being so stubborn with certain players.
He proved last year he can mix it against Barca, City, Liverpool and Arsenal, we need to set specific targets for ETH as only when he’s under pressure does he seem to produce that stubbornness in the right way!
I say all this knowing that he could set up 4–1-2-3 against Brentford, get turned over 3 or 4 nil again and then we’re back to wanting him sacked again, this pressure is on him his team lost 16 from 40 games or 40% loss rate!
Ineos need to say to ETH there are 11/12 games left this season, he can’t lose anymore than 2 more games and he has to win 8 or 9 of those left, if his stubbornness gets him into final position of P52 W31 D3 L18 and top4/5 CL and an Fa Cup then he deserves a further year?
What is very concerning however is that United have played 40 games in all competitions this season and scored only 65 goals and conceded 60 goals that’s an average of 1.65 goals scored per game and 1.50 goals conceded per game!
In ETH first season his team scored only 107 goals from 63 games or 1.70 goals per game however we’ve conceded more this year in 40 games than the team conceded in 63 last year 57 goals conceded in 63 Games is 0.90 goals per game and that difference of 0.6 goals extra every game this season is the reason why ETH job is on the line, had he recognised this like all elite coaches should , he would have made necessary corrections earlier and not have lost to Forrest, West Ham and Fulham since the Xmas period and the club would probably have top 4 in the bag.
I’m not sure whether he’s got an 8 out 10 in the PL record and 2 out of 2 wins in the FA Cup but that’s what it’s going to take for him to stay in a job, only 71 points makes top 4/5 this season.
With less luck than we've had in the narrow wins we could easily be bottom half.I mean, even with just a tiny bit more luck and avoiding some appalling decisions from the referees, we could easily be on 10 more points at 57 at this stage, which wouldn't be that far away from a title challenge, albeit obviously very unlikely still.
We are sitting at 62%+ (?) after basically a drop off in form since February last year until Xmas. Figure in the bad luck from injuries and we aren‘t doing terrible with this squad.You are suggesting 'easily' 70% which means we would be on 20 wins at least (from 28 games). That is 5 extra wins vs what we have. We have drawn 2 games and lost 11, so in worst case scenario we would turn 2 draws into wins (+ 4 points) and 3 defeats into wins (+ 9 points), putting us on 60 points and well in the title race.
Realistically though, we would not be on 20 wins and 8 defeats, so would likely need to add 3-4 more points for extra draws.
I think anyone is going to agree that even at full strength our team is far weaker than any of the top 3 too, so you are basically suggesting ETH is worth a good few extra points vs Arteta, Klopp and Pep. Not saying this is wrong necessarily.
The thing is - I doubt that "working on your pressing" will work this way. To get it really effective it has to be cohesive along the team. By allowing some players to drop out of the formation (the defenders by dropping deeper) you open up gaps that you usually don't want. In every pressing formation the forwards will open gaps between them that can be played through (because that's inevitable if you don't have 20 players in the first line), but the midfield and defence should position in a way that they will be at the end of these gaps and can intercept balls played through the first line. And the way it currently goes means that these interceptors are missing almost completely. So they can't get used to where to position in relation to the forwards pressing, and the forwards can't get a feeling for which gaps are ok/useful, and which are dangerous, when they leave them open.
But we could have quite easily have far fewer points than we do have, we have allowed so many chances in some games that other teams have missed. Calling injuries bad luck also ignores the impact the manager and msdical staff have had on themI mean, even with just a tiny bit more luck and avoiding some appalling decisions from the referees, we could easily be on 10 more points at 57 at this stage, which wouldn't be that far away from a title challenge, albeit obviously very unlikely still.
What?
We are sitting at 62%+ (?) after basically a drop off in form since February last year until Xmas
62% is his total throughout his United career but it's somewhat inflated by being in Europa League last year with a very easy group where we won 5 out of 6, having a historically easy League Cup run (won 6 out of 6) as well as being at home for all FA Cup games last year (4 out of 6 wins). We were at 67% win rate last season with basically perfect injury record and favorable draws.We are sitting at 62%+ (?) after basically a drop off in form since February last year until Xmas. Figure in the bad luck from injuries and we aren‘t doing terrible with this squad.
Our xPTS for this season so far is 36. That would place us 13th.With less luck than we've had in the narrow wins we could easily be bottom half.
We've picked up 19 points from the last 10 games, compared to 16 in the 10 before that - if we do noticeably better than that in the last 10 games of the season and crack 70+ points to finish, I'll have much more faith in the manager and team. Based on how we've been playing (all season or since the new year, take your pick, really) I don't see it happening.
Our xPTS for this season so far is 36. That would place us 13th.
We really cannot claim we are only 6th because of referees and extremely bad luck, it is just not true. I get that we are excited with Liverpool win and the team playing better in recent weeks but all these claims of how we would be winning the league if it wasn't for Martinez and Shaw being out, or we would be comfortably up there with City, Liverpool and Arsenal if only we were more lucky and referees did not screw us over, that is just living in denial. Let's be real.
Yup, as a standalone it certainly is.xPts is a laughably bad metric.
We're at 58% after 63 league games under Ten Hag. 60% (23 wins in 38) last season and 54% (15 in 28) this season.
70% is a pipe dream, and I'm sure the last time we actually managed it in a league season was in Fergie's last year.
On the subject of benchmarks and what is acceptable, I spent the entire preseason of 2022/23 banging on about 75 points being the benchmark for a "good" season. We pulled that off, and threw in a cup to add some gloss. This season, I would have been okay with a repeat of that, ideally closer to 80. Right now our points-per-game has us on course to finish on 64, which is pretty much the bare minimum with the team we have, injuries or no injuries. That's why this talk about the supposedly vastly improved 2024 form doesn't really hold water for me yet.
We've picked up 19 points from the last 10 games, compared to 16 in the 10 before that - if we do noticeably better than that in the last 10 games of the season and crack 70+ points to finish, I'll have much more faith in the manager and team. Based on how we've been playing (all season or since the new year, take your pick, really) I don't see it happening.