I'm just not having the injuries excuse for being as bad as we are. Yes they are a factor (I've said enough so myself in the past) but with a decent system they should be the difference between us being a good team and a very good team, not a poor team and an average one.
I agree that we’ve been bad and performances have been shocking. We differ in that I don’t know how all the other stuff has played a Role. You are taking the view that it shouldn’t mean we can’t still meet certain standards. I don’t know how reasonable or fair that is because there were more than savage injuries at the club.
- history of over spending on players which continued under ETH , not his fault
- history of extending contracts of players who nobody wanted to or shouldn’t be here
- poor squad balance which is the clubs fault , no striker or Weghorst level alternative offered
- huge drama with at least 5 senior players in the space of 15 months , I include Rashford who nobody is blaming on ETH
- club sale - leaving everybody in limbo as to the future of the club and the manager
- injuries that quite frankly none of you factor in properly. Not one of you have done any meaningful research to try and explain how our injuries are no worse then anybody else.
All these things have destabilised plans and surely affected team morale. The question is to what degree. Maybe not enough to explain the season but they definitely played a role that any manager would struggle to navigate.
Our best form was after Ronaldo left and the team focused on football. We could build momentum and then we ran out of steam after league cup. All in all , after the season before , it was a good season.
From the off this season things haven’t been right. We looked as off as Liverpool did last season (the season after they played as many games as us). Then we had loads of injuries ti improving players , didn’t have a striker and Anthony , Greenwood , Sancho and even Rashford issues.
So I find this “everybody has injuries” statement a bad faith comment cause it’s not just injuries and not all injuries are the same. It’s everything that’s happened. Maybe a world class manager would somehow make it all work while the chaos has been going on but we just don’t know because we haven’t seen any manager have to navigate as many issues in such a short period of time.
How many sex scandals or players on the piss or lazy players or Pierce Morgan interviews have Ange had to manage at spurs? When Kane left how did Ange manage with only weghorst or a half fit youngster from serie A? How safe did Ange feel when spurs were put up for sale 5 months after he hired and what did his squad think about their futures?
United players/managers are expected to compete near or at the top and they are having to do so in the most dysfunctional set of circumstances. It’s hard enough to play well when you have a consistently starting squad that’s getting tired but we can’t even get to that point.
You can only see this as a defence of ETH because you don’t see the bigger picture. These are conditions our managers are having to work in that make it harder for our teams , regardless of who the manager is. Throw in Pep to that sh*t show and maybe we play better football and do better but we still don’t win anything. That’s just not good enough.
Stop banging on about ETH. He is not as important as what INEOs will hopefully do. If they set the structure right , to elite levels, then the ETH situation will take care of itself, which will be either him being gone or kept on (if INEOs (feel it makes sense).