Zlatan 7
We've got bush!
- Joined
- May 26, 2016
- Messages
- 12,390
I didn’t say that. I said we’d spent 400 million.Do you really believe that the price tags of the players determines the quality of the squad?
I didn’t say that. I said we’d spent 400 million.Do you really believe that the price tags of the players determines the quality of the squad?
The 1 in midfield is Onana.Regularly fielding 12 players is a surefire way to get sacked tbf.
the question is...8 or 6?!The 1 in midfield is Onana.
I don't understand why people should accept this when United have finished 3rd, 6th, 2nd, and 3rd the last four seasons.
We apparently really pushed for Bellingham at least.
I could be wrong but wasn't he also a Liverpool fan?I'm sure he was shown around Carrington at one point. Dortmund had a better path to first team football than United offered from what I recall
I could be wrong but wasn't he also a Liverpool fan?
I'd say the fans share some of the blame. I still think we have a group of good old boys planted at Manchester United and living the high life. A theory -- every time someone wants to interrupt the party and impose some structure/discipline, out comes MUST or other organizations to direct attention to the owners in Tampa Bay. And the fans fall for it every time, rather than working with the Glazers to clear out the rot in the organization.This point is being thrown around by some people as if they have made some profound observation. Which is just ridiculous. More than one thing at a time can be true.
Are the owners ultimately responsible? Yes. They are not going anywhere, though, so going over it again, and again, and again, and again is just pointless.
Is the structure of the club (or lack thereof) terrible? Yes. Remains to be seen what or if anything changes anytime soon.
Is the squad subpar? Yes. Ten Hag shares a big part of the blame for that. No one put a gun to his head and forced him to spend 200M on Casemiro, Mount, and Antony.
Has he been exposed as out of his depth? Yes. A good manager doesn't need world class in every position to deliver decent football. At least enough to not lose 3:0 at home to Bournemouth, be 1W/1D/3L, finish last in a Champions League group, and have a negative goal difference all around. We are the same as we were exactly 2 years ago.
Should he be sacked as soon as possible? Yes.
Could his replacement go down the same route? Yes. But every candidate should be doing their due diligence on what they are signing up for before taking the job. Not my problem if they come here and find out it's not what they expected. Maybe once the pool of candidates dries up and enough of them have rinsed the club out of substantial amounts of money when they get sacked someone inside the club will have a lightbulb moment.
Does any of that make me happy? Not at all.
None of those takes anything away from the others. It is that simple.
I believed in Ten Hag and he was probably the best candidate at the time. I wanted him here. But he was always a calculated risk. An unknown. It simply hasn't panned out. Time to cut our losses and move on. Well... unless the replacement is Graham Potter. I'd rather stick with Ten Hag then and bet on the minimal chance he comes good.
Yes, because the Glazer's would definitely be collaborative with fans to clear out the organisation that they lead. Wikipedia also says that David Gill joined United 8 years before the Glazer's took over, they did bring in Ed Woodward though after he helped advise them on the takeover and a lot of the "good old boys" still in tact are Woodward allies (including Arnold) or Woodward appointments (including Murtough).I'd say the fans share some of the blame. I still think we have a group of good old boys planted at Manchester United and living the high life. A theory -- every time someone wants to interrupt the party and impose some structure/discipline, out comes MUST or other organizations to direct attention to the owners in Tampa Bay. And the fans fall for it every time, rather than working with the Glazers to clear out the rot in the organization.
Sir Alex and David Gill (Gill was brought in by the Glazer says Wikipedia, is this true?) both left at the same time, leaving a shambles behind them + David Moyes. Another duo who shares the blame. Well, a trio.
What the feck are you talking about? They are the organisation. You think they're looking for the fans to reach out and help them?? Sweet Jesus.I'd say the fans share some of the blame. I still think we have a group of good old boys planted at Manchester United and living the high life. A theory -- every time someone wants to interrupt the party and impose some structure/discipline, out comes MUST or other organizations to direct attention to the owners in Tampa Bay. And the fans fall for it every time, rather than working with the Glazers to clear out the rot in the organization.
Sir Alex and David Gill (Gill was brought in by the Glazer says Wikipedia, is this true?) both left at the same time, leaving a shambles behind them + David Moyes. Another duo who shares the blame. Well, a trio.
If rashford was 2/3 to half the player he was last year Hojland would have benefited a lot from the positions he got himself in. Antony and sancho combined did the numbers of a mediocre RW, literally. I just see that side being a massive issue which is why I’d rather us play with two up top, a creator in Bruno underneath and then three CMsNo, although I do think Martinez is a major factor by the way, both in our rest defence and our build-up. I'd like to see ETH with Martinez and new CB and I'd also like to see a new defensive midfielder, not a loan player like Amrabat.
I'm not going to cry if ETH gets the sack but I think some fans genuinely are not remembering some of the football we played last season and are acting as if you should only expect linear progression.
Our attack was not good enough last season and Hojlund alone was not going to change that, in the defence and build up it was very apparent Martinez was a key player and missing him all season has obvioulsy also not helped.
ETH himself is also making mistakes, but I don't think any manager is going to come in and not make mistakes
What the feck are you talking about? They are the organisation. You think they're looking for the fans to reach out and help them?? Sweet Jesus.
I'll say this given I was still complaining when this place was full of Ten Hag fans when we were 3 behind City.
If he survives the next 3, he'll be good for the season. (liv (A), whu (A), AVL (H))
Louis van Gaal says hi. I guess the Dutch are stubborn in their ways. Funny enough, the last time I recall a variant of a single pivot working was under him, where for a stretch of games the Carrick, Herrera, Fellaini midfield was very dominant for us which included that famous Juanfield.I've yet to meet a man who is so confidently wrong over and over again.
i think there should be no discussion of sacking the manager. What would the plan be? Sack him, get another one and sack him after 18 months? Just continue the cycle?
What cycle are you talking about? The only cycle I see is us hiring crap managers. This is the first time after SAF that we hire a manager that realistically could work (could've worked).
Yeah this season's been extremely bizarre. He had more joy from last season and was pretty much heralded like Ange this season.He can, he does and you can see it. It just doesn't work most of the time.
He is talking about the cycle of delusion.What cycle are you talking about? The only cycle I see is us hiring crap managers. This is the first time after SAF that we hire a manager that realistically could work (could've worked).
I think you said spending £400m means your squad must be better than 6th place. Do you really believe that to be true? Or in other words, do you really believe that if the players cost a lot they must, by definition, be of corresponding quality?I didn’t say that. I said we’d spent 400 million.
Do you really believe that the price tags of the players determines the quality of the squad?
Not just that spending £400 mil makes you better than 6th place but that we were already better than 6th place before spending £400 million.I think you said spending £400m means your squad must be better than 6th place. Do you really believe that to be true? Or in other words, do you really believe that if the players cost a lot they must, by definition, be of corresponding quality?
Or shall we just look at the actual players in the whole squad and ask whether, as a group, they are genuinely better than 6th place?
Everyone knows we spent too much on the players we bought. However, when fit, they are arguably better than the players we had before. It should be obvious to everyone at this point that elite players don’t want to come here and clubs know that we don’t have the options we used to have, they know we are desperate and they milk us.
There may be an argument for promoting youth and building from the bottom up (instead of overspending on tier 2 players) but that also wouldn’t make the squad good enough to compete on similar footing to the teams above us. Not right away.
If we get everyone fit, we can put out a team that belongs in the top four. I’ll give you that. Most of the time we’re carrying players who aren’t up to it.
He must know Antony isn’t worth 90m and if he didn’t that’s even more alarming
Basic financials he must know if the club spend 90m on one of his targets that budget comes out of further signings
We have 2 football matches in January. That should mean we should, in theory, have our entire squad fit for the first time. And most importantly, our entire first XI fit for the first time.
ten Hag is not in charge of the transfer fee or the final wage of his players. Basically, as is with many other clubs, the manager identifies a target and corresponds with 'the powers that be' to secure the player.
In other words, it's on Arnold/Murtough Antony was acquired for as much as he was. Ten times his Ajax wage. Ten times.
This doesn't exonerate EtH from his blame (we should be focusing on performance as he's been the biggest letdown this term), but managers generally follow players from their host league or hitherto staff. What's absent at OT is a reputable scouting network, the likes of which is present at other clubs, including clubs much smaller than ours. It's genuinely EtH doing all the work (as it was with previous managers).
Sacking EtH and not replacing the structure around him is the definition of insanity. United are desperate for serious change.
So what you are saying is ETH said I like Antony and Murtough turned up one day and said 'Suprise! We got him for 90 mill and 200 grand a week! Bargain!' and ETH said 'How much! I meant get him for 30 ish! I can't believe you guys sometimes. You're crazy!'ten Hag is not in charge of the transfer fee or the final wage of his players. Basically, as is with many other clubs, the manager identifies a target and corresponds with 'the powers that be' to secure the player.
In other words, it's on Arnold/Murtough Antony was acquired for as much as he was. Ten times his Ajax wage. Ten times.
This doesn't exonerate EtH from his blame (we should be focusing on performance as he's been the biggest letdown this term), but managers generally follow players from their host league or hitherto staff. What's absent at OT is a reputable scouting network, the likes of which is present at other clubs, including clubs much smaller than ours. It's genuinely EtH doing all the work (as it was with previous managers).
Sacking EtH and not replacing the structure around him is the definition of insanity. United are desperate for serious change.
ten Hag is not in charge of the transfer fee or the final wage of his players. Basically, as is with many other clubs, the manager identifies a target and corresponds with 'the powers that be' to secure the player.
In other words, it's on Arnold/Murtough Antony was acquired for as much as he was. Ten times his Ajax wage. Ten times.
This doesn't exonerate EtH from his blame (we should be focusing on performance as he's been the biggest letdown this term), but managers generally follow players from their host league or hitherto staff. What's absent at OT is a reputable scouting network, the likes of which is present at other clubs, including clubs much smaller than ours. It's genuinely EtH doing all the work (as it was with previous managers).
Sacking EtH and not replacing the structure around him is the definition of insanity. United are desperate for serious change.
The wage certainly isn't ETH's fault in that situation. But he definitely can take some blame for the transfer fee depending on how insistent he is on getting certain players.ten Hag is not in charge of the transfer fee or the final wage of his players. Basically, as is with many other clubs, the manager identifies a target and corresponds with 'the powers that be' to secure the player.
In other words, it's on Arnold/Murtough Antony was acquired for as much as he was. Ten times his Ajax wage. Ten times.
You have a higher opinion of the players than me, evidently.Not just that spending £400 mil makes you better than 6th place but that we were already better than 6th place before spending £400 million.
although people say we have been shit for the last ten years, we have yes but that’s being relative to our expectations. We’ve hovered around top four for the last decade without ever looking serious title challengers. Now we’ve got a new Manager and spent that amount of money but all of a sudden you see people say we are only expected 6th - 10th. For me that points to both the manager and recruitment being shit if it’s true.
You have a higher opinion of the players than me, evidently.
It doesn’t really matter how good we were in the past. Expectation for the club is obviously to challenge for the title but you can’t do it without good players. Leicester won it with a system that suited their players but, crucially, they had Kante, Mahrez and Vardy. Put those three in our team and we’d be winning a lot more games.
The recruitment hasn’t been great and, yes, we spent loads so it’s definitely been poor value for money. It’s just not a simple job to recruit three players of the quality of 2016-era Kante, Mahrez and Vardy but that is essentially what we need.
Reasonable people look at our starting players over the last few months and realise that most of them would not get into the team if they were at most top-half clubs. We do have some good players but not many of them are available. The ones that are haven’t been playing well.
The manager has made some strange decisions and over-estimates the players ability to carry out his instructions. That’s on EtH. He’s flawed. To suggest his available players are good enough is unnecessary and far from true. There’s plenty of justifiable criticism for EtH without the need to exaggerate. If it’s short term results you want, Sam Allardyce will do a job.
Are you mad?
Thanks for the whiplash.
"recruitment hasn't been great". Also, take three top players from a PL winning side and just "put those three in our team and we'd be winning a lot more games".
You sound exactly like all our post SAF managers. Just buy three top players for our current team regardless of the manager's style and calibre and we'll obviously win a "lot" more games.
Yeah, EtH just happens to be shit. Give yourself a biscuit for that analysis.There's an obvious, and strong correlation. To deny that is just ridiculous.
We just happen to have landed on another shite manager who has shown no sign of learning from his mistakes.
It really has struck me over the last few days how we’re likely to get comfortably beaten by Liverpool today, and it won’t even really be that big of a story, it’s expected. The position this club currently is in, is unforgivable.
It will hurt. We might be numb but some pain gets through. Every loss to Liv feels like the last straw to me. It’s inevitable, of course, so it’s hurting already.So true. It won't even hurt as usual as we have been mentally prepared for this I hope we don't concede double digits today.
But why does he want to continue playing like this through an injury crisis when it’s clearly not working and is disastrous on both sides of the pitch?We have been in this situation before, but what is different now is that the majority realize the manager is only part of the equation.
Last season you were all yammering on about playing out the back, replacing DeGea and pressing high, now I read replacing the gk wasn’t a priority and we should not play that way.
Why is Hag persisting? Playing through the press if there is one, opens up space for our fast attackers playing to their strengths, and Bruno’s.
Pressing high generates turnovers which would normally speaking get us goals. With attackers out of form, teenagers leading the line, some downing tools and Martial being done at this level, we aren’t scoring.
If you think we ought to be challenging for top three with these issues, you are mistaken. We need to persist and finish reshaping the squad: results will come.
Of course it will help if we sort out all the other issues in the club. I personally hope Ten Hag will survive long enough to finish what he started.