Give me one good reaon why we can only work on one transfer at a time
I don’t have one but we’ve been working on at least two?
FDJ and Eriksen. And likely Timber, too.
Give me one good reaon why we can only work on one transfer at a time
Give me one good reaon why we can only work on one transfer at a time
You know this for sure?Give me one good reaon why we can only work on one transfer at a time
Who's to say we are only working on one target ?
Maybe it is a really tight and finite budget this summer, so any hike in the price ( or potential saving) could impact other targets. Moreover Barca need the deal done by Fri and you would assume that they have insisted that a lot of the fee is upfront cold hard cash. Which again will impact potential other transfers and the structure of the finance.
First para is just a tad too much conjecture to make this point. Can appreciate the attempt at optimism but based on what we know it's easy to deduce this isn't likely to be the case. We already know Darwin Nunez would have been out first transfer if he didn't choose Liverpool. We also know ETH resumed early and wanted the deals done before report of preseason. Gating the entire summer business on one transfer goes against what has already played out. Timber as well could have been here before FDJ if not for LVG.
Most importantly putting a pause on other transfers till the one gets done would be a suicide strategy. The club isn't stupid, no transfer is guaranteed. It wont put all its eggs into the one basket that may never even matetialise. Can't say the growing concern isn't justified only to offer up conjecture that wouldn't just be illogical in its application but also one that would just make the club look even worse.
I don’t have one but we’ve been working on at least two?
FDJ and Eriksen. And likely Timber, too.
You think it's conjecture that we were in for Nunez and Timber? What the hell? You know what the term means right? So why not also call the FDJ transfer news conjecture? These things were reported by several sources. So for you things that are actually reported by several sources are the same as a personal theory that ETH has gated all transfer business till FDJ gets here? Or were you simply overly eager to throw the term back at me? In any case I gave some reasons why I believed the theory to be unlikely so that might have been a better start for a reply than simply weaponizing the term. Who knows, maybe you might even have convinced one of its plausibility. Definitely beats denying a well established interest in Timber or Nunez.With all due respect, your argument my post is largely conjecture, is based on, well, ....conjecture.
1. Nunez - conjecture
2. "We also know ETH resumed early and wanted the deals done before report of preseason." - absolutely conjecture - ETH nor United have ever stated anything of the kind.
3. Gating the entire summer business on one transfer goes against what has already played out. - means what exactly? What has been 'played out already, if not conjecture in the media?
4. "Timber as well could have been here before FDJ if not for LVG." - the use of the words 'could well have...is, well, conjecture.
5. "Most importantly putting a pause on other transfers till the one gets done would be a suicide strategy." - that is just your personal opinion, isnt it.
I'm not sure if the players enjoy each other's company as a collective, a few players are good friends with each other and that's about it.
Also, I agree with one of the posters above, that no organisation should mandate employees to spend time with their colleagues. I don't think this will have any benefit.
As far as his training with the ball is concerned, when a manager implements this, the players are expected to take care of their individual fitness levels, this bunch needs to be handheld for everything.
Anyway, no point speculating so much before a ball has been kicked. We'll see what happens.
Why not?No colleagues should be mandated to eat or socialise together.
Give me proof we are only working on one transfer.Give me one good reaon why we can only work on one transfer at a time
I'm not sure if the players enjoy each other's company as a collective, a few players are good friends with each other and that's about it.
Also, I agree with one of the posters above, that no organisation should mandate employees to spend time with their colleagues. I don't think this will have any benefit.
As far as his training with the ball is concerned, when a manager implements this, the players are expected to take care of their individual fitness levels, this bunch needs to be handheld for everything.
Anyway, no point speculating so much before a ball has been kicked. We'll see what happens.
Because you're not paid for that. Also some people wouldn't be comfortable with it for various reasons.Why not?
They can still work together on the pitch without having to be forced to spend meal times with each other. I just think the ideas that worked for ETH at Ajax are necessarily going to work here, even the ideas that worked under SAF are going to work if any other manager implements it.A football team is not like a normal organisation. Having them eat together at the training complex is about as standard as it gets. If the players have issues between themselves, it's not really ideal, and I'd assume if they aren't valuable on the pitch (like Sheringham and Cole) they'd be shipped out. They don't have to be best friends, but drama won't help unifying a team.
Because you're not paid for that. Also some people wouldn't be comfortable with it for various reasons.
They are paid to be professional and do as they are told, within reason of course. Eating a meal together is certainly within reason. It's a perfectly normal thing that teams doBecause you're not paid for that. Also some people wouldn't be comfortable with it for various reasons.
This isn't the corporate world. It's a football team. The more the players interact, the more they build team spirit which is needed on the pitch.No colleagues should be mandated to eat or socialise together.
I have a lot of respect for Slot , but he is not yet on the level of Erik ten Hag. I know you are biast because of Feyenoord, but you must remain realisticIt's official, you bought the wrong Dutch bald guy. Arne Slot won the Rinus Michels award.
Was I really being serious though?I have a lot of respect for Slot , but he is not yet on the level of Erik ten Hag. I know you are biast because of Feyenoord, but you must remain realistic
No colleagues should be mandated to eat or socialise together.
Just because your brain computes that doesn’t mean it’s correct. We know that you’re wrong because we have offered a contract to EriksenGive me one good reaon why we can only work on one transfer at a time
im sure that there are countless phone calls and meetings that do not get reported too
I know that you’re not correct by the simple fact that we have offered to Eriksen at the same time as negotiations for FDJ are in. That is by my calculations more than 1.You are giving our board far too much credit.
Given the history over the last decade, I am inclined to believe that we are focusing on 1 transfer and will move for other targets (seriously), once the result FDJ is known.
The board has zero goodwill in my book and I am more inclined to believe that they are messing things up, than doing things right.
LFC sorted out their transfer of Nunez quickly. And sold Mane, so that his transfer funds can be used elsewhere.
MCFC sorted out Haaland and Philips quickly.
We, on the other hand, who NEED to rebuild (ie. sell AND buy), have done nothing in the market so far.
It baffles me that after the board has screwed up so badly in the last decade, most of you are giving them credit. This is like you defending a wife who has repeatedly cheated on you with different men for a decade.
I know that you’re not correct by the simple fact that we have offered to Eriksen at the same time as negotiations for FDJ are in. That is by my calculations more than 1.
you’re also dismissive of loads of phone calls and meetings I see. So am i to conclude that you think they sit with the feet up listening to summer tunes for the rest of the time?
Some of these guys are relentless. They're gonna repeat the same stuff over and over again whatever you reply to them.I know that you’re not correct by the simple fact that we have offered to Eriksen at the same time as negotiations for FDJ are in. That is by my calculations more than 1.
you’re also dismissive of loads of phone calls and meetings I see. So am i to conclude that you think they sit with the feet up listening to summer tunes for the rest of the time?
I know that you’re not correct by the simple fact that we have offered to Eriksen at the same time as negotiations for FDJ are in. That is by my calculations more than 1.
you’re also dismissive of loads of phone calls and meetings I see. So am i to conclude that you think they sit with the feet up listening to summer tunes for the rest of the time?
They are paid to be professional and do as they are told, within reason of course. Eating a meal together is certainly within reason. It's a perfectly normal thing that teams do
Exactly. 'There is no I in TEAM' isn't just a plain or pointless expression.Eating a meal together is as basic as it gets when it comes to human behaviour and togetherness. Families and groups have been doing it since caveman days. Family members don't always get on but they are fighting together as a group to survive in the Stone Age the same as fighting together as a team today.