Shaw, Onana, Varane, Martinez, Lindelöf, Shaw, Mount, Garnacho, Højlund, Mainoo. The rest can go.
We've seen fans and media alike say the same things over and over again regarding the player/manager relationship.
At United, due to our past, the blame for poor performance is always pinned on the players. You have people talking about players consistently doing this despite the fact that it's a different set of players each time. This isn't Mourinho's Chelsea in the late 2000's with the same core. The squad has gone from the left overs of Fergie, to the Pogba era to the Fernandes era.
We no longer have Fred, CR7, Greenwood, De Gea. Lindelof, Maguire, Mctominay, Sancho and Martial don't start games regularly.
When people are talking of players in this current squad: Onana, Varane, AWB, Licha, Shaw, Casemiro, Bruno, Rashford and Antony are the main core. Almost all of whom have performed well over Ten Haag's tenure. Most of whom have had successes at various stages of their career, known to be tough and to work hard. Bruno, Casemiro, Licha and Varane are the leaders of this team. They aren't the same players that played under Mourinho. Yet fans and media alike keep talking about player power and the players doing this again.
Similar to some players, we need to have the same assessment of our managers. If a manager fails to get a tune out of players at the club, that's on the manager. Why can't we accept that theres a good chance we just got the wrong guy for the job?
Antony played well at Ajax, as did VDB, but have been terrible in a faster, more physical league. Same for Sancho. Why doesn't the same rule apply to managers. Why is the expectation at United that inherently they are smart and have good strategy, but the players aren't good enough to carry them out? Theres a good chance his strategy doesn't suit the league. There's a good chance that he can't keep up with the urgency expected at United. His communication may have worked at Ajax, but the language barrier may hinder it here, why isn't that possible? This is the territory a lot of other teams have faced and the solution, despite the media narrative, has always been to get rid of the manager until you find the right one. The club should be doing a better job in managing the players we sign, but on the pitch, the buck should always stop with the manager and that's a lesson we keep struggling to understand as a club.
This isn't to say that managers shouldn't be given time. They should, when they have a system in place that they have proven can and has been successful. In 2002, Fergie was having a difficult time, but we had a system that even in that period was still working, despite defensive mistakes that were hurting us. We were dominating games, but losing or drawing games. Mourinho in 2007 had a good system, they just didn't fly off the blocks like they were used to. Ancelotti (Chelsea) in 2011 had a system that had worked, but it was clear that some of his key players had aged and needed to be replaced which the Chelsea hierarchy didn't give him a chance to do. Ancelotti (Madrid) in 2015 played good football. He had proven himself and his system. His team played well, but didn't win. This is what wrongful sacking looked or would have looked like. That's not what's happening currently at United.