VP89
Pogba's biggest fan
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2015
- Messages
- 34,489
Which one? Onana?He has about 1 game out of 15 games here which has been good. There rest are average to poor to shockingly poor.
Which one? Onana?He has about 1 game out of 15 games here which has been good. There rest are average to poor to shockingly poor.
Are you a DOF? I'm not, I still wouldn't sign Antony for £90m, Mount for £55m, Casemiro for £60m, Hojlund for £70m etc when we're bereft of a midfield. Ten Hag doesn't need 10 years experience as a DOF to know that either, and Murtough is simply doing his job in backing the manager who decides he wants certain players, at whatever the cost it seems because Ten Hag think they're the 'complete midfielder' and who is Murtough to challenge that opinion as someone who's never managed a game in his life?He's not a director of football. Why are you so insistent on thinking our transfer failures is solely down to him. You keep peddling this broken logic it's really frustrating, almost as though you were burried under a rock for 10 years and didnt know we wasted money on shit players long before Ten Hag came in.
Be that as it may (I think you're chatting bollocks anyway but will entertain your "I wouldn't do xyz") - its not his job to finalize those players and sanction them and then sanction the money spent.Are you a DOF? I'm not, I still wouldn't sign Antony for £90m, Mount for £55m, Casemiro for £60m, Hojlund for £70m etc when we're bereft of a midfield. Ten Hag doesn't need 10 years experience as a DOF to know that either, and Murtough is simply doing his job in backing the manager who decides he wants certain players, at whatever the cost it seems because Ten Hag think they're the 'complete midfielder' and who is Murtough to challenge that opinion as someone who's never managed a game in his life?
We previously left our signings to a certain Woodward, which also didn't work. Giving Ten Hag free will is equally as bad.
He has lost the dressing rooms of overpaid assholes, I can't think of any other reason for that performance. They just didn't try with any heart.
All the signings we've made are linked to Ten Hag in some capacity. He managed them, he played against them in Holland, they have the same management agency etc. They're his players, he wanted them, he got them, now he states he can't play good football with the players he wanted and signed.Be that as it may (I think you're chatting bollocks anyway but will entertain your "I wouldn't do xyz") - its not his job to finalize those players and sanction them and then sanction the money spent.
We wasted money before Ten Hag, we've wasted some money under Ten Hag. You can pick 100 things to genuinely criticize Ten Hag but don't talk like a bafoon insinuating the £400m spent is solely his remit.
Do you think the club recruited him to mandate that he implements direct football? The club targeted his key signings and let him opt for familiarity over other scouted profiles, and sided with him in some big player decisions -- I highly doubt this was all underpinned by the caveat of ensuring he played direct football.Only we could be so inept that we hired one of the best posession based managers in Europe - at the time - who is a notoriously bad recruiter and his very specialised coaching staff to implement direct football and head the recruitment. What the hell are we thinking.
They just aren't that good. People looked down on the Newcastle side before the game last night but their two full backs Hall and Livramento cost £60m+ between them and are both highly rated. Meanwhile we're playing Dalot who has never been good enough and a Spurs reject.Same players same result under a 3rd or 4th coach. Is there an argument for the players not listening to the coach when the going gets tough?
This is it in a nutshell.
ETH's comment that these players cannot play like Ajax, felt like a resignation to me.
It felt to me as though he knows that these players will not adapt, take onboard new ideas, or be prepared to graft.
Funnily they were saying on the radio this morning, appoint De Zerbi, look how he has Brighton playing.
Which makes me laugh, do you honestly see these players running their socks off for the cause, and putting in the kind of effort that Brighton's players do..?
He's been found out, simple as that. Last season Spurs, Liverpool, even City and Arsenal.. all were works in progress... now look, and add to that Brentford, Brighton, Villa... I wouldn't put West Ham or Palace too far behind. Other manager's have stepped up and improved, and ETH has been left wanting. His talent, qualities as a coach and manager are under more scrutiny and he's struggling.
We're rubbish and uninspired under ETH. Seven of the starters last night were his signings. He has recruited 16 players in his time. This is his team. Nothing to do with 'the Glazers'. We have a number of decent players, who are playing dreadful football, consistently. Why is that? Because of the Glazers? Don't make me laugh. ETH has been found out. Look at the great Ajax legacy that he left behind. Look at them now.
I would love to Alonso at Leverskusen, but I think he may be lining up Liverpool post-Klopp.
Yeh..Which one? Onana?
So effectively he said the players are shit? After signing most of them? Got it...
Are there any other big team manager out there who have more of his own players in starting line up playing worst football though?The football and results haven't been great, but there's no need to make stuff up. He's signed 16 players.. only 8 of those have been permanent transfers with a fee involved, one was a backup keeper. The rest have been frees and loans to cover holes in the squad.
Only 7 players he signed out of the 15 that played last night, 2 of them were loanees, 4+1 emergency loan started. 5 players he actually bought played, that's really only half his team.
Onana - ETH
Dalot -Jose
Lindelof - Jose
Maguire - Ole
Reguilon - ETH emergency loan
Casemiro - ETH
Mount - ETH
Antony - ETH
Martial - LVG
Garnacho -Youth (Ole)
Subs
Amrabat- ETH Loan
Hojlund - ETH
Bruno - Ole
Rashford - Youth (LVG)
Are there any other big team manager out there who have more of his own players in starting line up playing worst football though?
Then blame the director of football for not doing his job and actually putting forward targets of their own. Ten hag is a manager. Criticise his managing.All the signings we've made are linked to Ten Hag in some capacity. He managed them, he played against them in Holland, they have the same management agency etc. They're his players, he wanted them, he got them, now he states he can't play good football with the players he wanted and signed.
We wasted money before, but now we're wasting really big money on some guys that are linked to Ten Hag's management company (that his son works at no less) instead of trusting our scouts who lets be honest, couldn't do any worse at this point.
Played very well vs copenhagen and City do it didn't take long to find more than one in 15.Yeh..
Ok. Make it count as 2 in 15 games then. Impressive stats.Played very well vs copenhagen and City do it didn't take long to find more than one in 15.
Nah, I don't really have a narrative here. It's just difficult after such a loss what you say as a manager, I can see that. If you say that they didn't give their best, you throw them under the bus, the alternative is to say they tried their best (as he did) which suggests they are just not good enough. Whatever you say as a manager at this point can't look good, because what happened is just bad.He didn't say that. He started by saying he is fully responsible for the bad performances of the team. Didn't get drawn on any individualsd despite them trying to get him to slag Antony and, when asked how he gets out of this situation, responded by saying he won't give up because he's a fighter.
Sorry if that doesn't fit with your narrative, but you can go watch his press conference yourself if you don't believe me.
Yes, the DOF was going to sign Antony, Mount, Onana, Amrabat, Malacia, and Martinez on his own accord regardless of who the manager was. So its definitely on him. So with that to one side, can we ask why the feck Ten Hag won't play any of the players his DOF has signed for him? I thought he worked well in that system where he received players purchased for him?Then blame the director of football for not doing his job and actually putting forward targets of their own. Ten hag is a manager. Criticise his managing.
I like this idea of wholesale change of 30 new players in the squad before making an impact.How many other big team managers have had to come in and deal with the same levels of bad overpaid signings and squad building that has accumulated over 4/5 managers in 10 years?
I'm not making excuses for him, but the absolute state of that squad for the money that's been spent of them and the wages they are on. As I posted above, at least 15 players int his squad need to go and be replaced over the next few years. It takes more than 18 months to sort that shit out.
So he had a bad game yesterday too?Ok. Make it count as 2 in 15 games then. Impressive stats.
The manager doesn't strong the DoF. If they are yes men, then thats a problem with the structure.Yes, the DOF was going to sign Antony, Mount, Onana, Amrabat, Malacia, and Martinez on his own accord regardless of who the manager was. So its definitely on him. So with that to one side, can we ask why the feck Ten Hag won't play any of the players his DOF has signed for him? I thought he worked well in that system where he received players purchased for him?
Nah, I don't really have a narrative here. It's just difficult after such a loss what you say as a manager, I can see that. If you say that they didn't give their best, you throw them under the bus, the alternative is to say they tried their best (as he did) which suggests they are just not good enough. Whatever you say as a manager at this point can't look good, because what happened is just bad.
Sack him, he’s too good a coach to be tarnished at United due to the ineptitude of the owners and the lack of structure at the club.
Only we could be so inept that we hired one of the best posession based managers in Europe - at the time - who is a notoriously bad recruiter and his very specialised coaching staff to implement direct football and head the recruitment. What the hell are we thinking.
Nah, I don't really have a narrative here. It's just difficult after such a loss what you say as a manager, I can see that. If you say that they didn't give their best, you throw them under the bus, the alternative is to say they tried their best (as he did) which suggests they are just not good enough. Whatever you say as a manager at this point can't look good, because what happened is just bad.
He's not a director of football. Why are you so insistent on thinking our transfer failures is solely down to him. You keep peddling this broken logic it's really frustrating, almost as though you were burried under a rock for 10 years and didnt know we wasted money on shit players long before Ten Hag came in.
But it could well be that the job is too big for him. I wanted here, like so many others, but he looks absolutely overwhelmed, and because of how he alienated portions of the squad, he's created rifts where the squaddies aren't playing for him, which gives him little to nowhere to turn to i.e. a sinking ship that he more than likely doesn't have the means to get to the proverbial port anymore.Yes, we have been absolutely woeful in the last few matches and the season as a whole has been shocking. That being said, I don't think ETH can be deemed a charlatan or anything of the sort as it ignores context and his very recent managerial history. What I will say is that he absolutely lacks courage.
Which I've dug into. Antony for sure. Mount the jury is out.Because some of the failed transfers played under him.
Why can't some accept, that maybe, just maybe, ETH is just not as good of a coach as we thought. Sure he did well with Ajax and had a great season in CL, where he was ultimately undone by Spurs, but as many before him have shown, that does not necessarily translate to the PL. He has shown little in the way of adaptability and complete lack of (self) awareness by sticking to his system, which is not suited to the PL and/or has been found out, yet he proceedes to only shuffle players aronud, hoping it will somehow magically click.
He's had plenty of time and has so far shown nothing to suggest, he has any idea how to turn this around, zero. His transfers are also bemusing, to say the least, as other then Arambat, the others were not really needed. De Gea had his shortcommings, but is Onana really an upgrade, Mount, while certainly not a bad player, doesn't plug any gapping holes in the team.
Some people are calling him a fraud, and I think it's unfair, but as Wout demonstrated last year, a player who's had a decent return in every league he's played in, has spectacullary failed in the PL, twice, scoring only 2 goals in 37 apperances, the PL is "different" and not everyone adapts.
People keep using cliches like he lost the dressing room, player power, primadonnas etc - some even buying into conspiracy theories about him not being allowed to shout at players or the players revolting because of Sancho - but the players don’t look like they’ve given up - they’re trying. they just don’t seem to know what to do and they’re not very good
these things fall on the manager - when you consider how long he’s been here, how much he’s spent and how many players he’s brought in. Also, United has been shit since last season.
maybe the manager’s just out of his depth
Which I've dug into. Antony for sure. Mount the jury is out.
I want to know who are 'his' players which are classed as failures. I'm not a fan of some of his transfers don't get me wrong. But I want to dig into the "wasted £400m" line.
I'd call Antony a failure.Antony, Malacia, Martinez, Onana... I would not call these players failures. But I would say that, as of right now, they don't look like long-term signings for a club of the level and expectations of Manchester United. This is an indication that, perhaps, the job is too big for Ten Hag. That he can't really see what sets apart the players for a top top club from the players that can do a good job somewhere else.