cyberman
Full Member
- Joined
- May 26, 2010
- Messages
- 37,331
Because of our crippling injury crises? The man played Pellestri away to Bayern.Why the hell has he lost his ruthlessness in picking players in form….
Because of our crippling injury crises? The man played Pellestri away to Bayern.Why the hell has he lost his ruthlessness in picking players in form….
Last game we had Garnacho, Mount, Martial, and Pellistri on the bench.
Before we even had Sancho is better goalscorer than Anthony but Ten Hag only rotated him on the left, in the tittle he played him.
Yeah I think quite a few people will agree to disagree on that.None of them would be as good as Rashford or Antony on the wings.
10th place?Joke. We look awful. One wonders if we’d have gone for Pochettino where we would be right now…
None of them would be as good as Rashford or Antony on the wings.
I keep seeing that percentage drop over time it's easy to see where it's going. For me
Because of our crippling injury crises? The man played Pellestri away to Bayern.
I’d stick Martial out left for a few games and leave Rashford on the benchNone of them would be as good as Rashford or Antony on the wings.
.None of them would be as good as Rashford or Antony on the wings.
I’d stick Martial out left for a few games and leave Rashford on the bench
Yeah but Pellestri didn’t play that well and was dropped soon afterThat was his choice. Could have played Pellestri against Brighton and gone with the more defensive setup against Bayern. Throwing Pellestri into the deep end was highly questionable. A player he's been reluctant to use but started him in our hardest fixture this season... Bizarre.
.
Yeah, because they've been absolutely great. 3 goals involvement for Antony in last 365 days is a great return, undroppable quality.
Yeah but Pellestri didn’t play that well and was dropped soon after
I’m just pointing out the options, you can’t really say drop underperforming players then say playing their replacements is throwing them in the deep end. Usually this season what we have on the pitch is all we have
Klopp earned the time he was given by winning the CL and PL. ETH has no such credit in the bank.Surely if they recovered well that means that there's an argument for giving Ten Hag more time given the situation. Liverpool were shite for 2/3 of that season and went on a title form run at the end.
Also when they twatted us, we had schedule issues and had to play 5 games in 9 days, including two EL semi final games. So some context is needed
10th place?
10th place?
We were what? 5 games in at that stage? Unless you’re not giving our attackers a chance to fail then it’s near impossible for any back up attacker to get more minutes. He played well in training to the point he kept Sancho at home and got his chance by playing well off the bench. There isn’t much more you can ask of Pellestri or even the manager himself imo.Imagine being in Pellestris shoes watching our attack be utter shit and only be given 5mins on the odd occasion but then being thrown in the deep end away to Bayern. On top of that the Manager says that his world class opponent is shit at defending. Its just bad management. If he thought Pellestri was an option then surely you give him a bit of time on the pitch prior to that game? Or give him the easier games and use your seniors against Bayern.
Just seemed like he chucked him in as a last resort.
I’d stick Martial out left for a few games and leave Rashford on the bench
We do need to see if things improve when the injury list looks more normal. However, how long after that arbitrary time will he get in the eyes of fans? Not long id assume. Rightly or wrongly his coaching will be under even more scrutiny.I might be hoping too much, but weve been missing our starting back 4 pretty much all season so far, and this also obviously has a massive impact on a new goalkeeper. No club is going to be playing to a high standard with their back 4 out as much as we have. We signed reguilon as an emergency, and then he got injured! I've worries about how clueless we look in attack too, but things will surely improve when defence is someway settled
pElLiStRi WiLl SoLvE aLl OuR pRoBlEmSWho would you play instead of Antony and Rashford?
pElLiStRi WiLl SoLvE aLl OuR pRoBlEmS
I bet someone will come in here soon and say "Just promote Shea Lacey to the first team and give him a chance, surely it can't get any worse?", which will probably make my head fecking explode.
You think Martial would last a few games!!I’d stick Martial out left for a few games and leave Rashford on the bench
Garnacho's not ready to start regularly, yet.I have been very supportive but if Garnacho does not begin to start most games, I will lose patience. Hojlund and Garnacho are our only game changers at this point.
The problem is the alternatives.Imagine continuing playing Anthony who doesn't score or assist almost at all, and underperforming Rashford as 2/3 forwards and continue to ask yourself why aren't we scoring more goals. Add Bruno on top of that too. And don't forget he dod the same with fecking Wout half of last season too.
I am begging someone to explain any logic behind those decisions?
For me, he doesn't deserve any sympathy simply because of this simple stubbornness. The guy is literally making himself look like an amateur ever since January last year for some reason.
The problem is the alternatives.
Neither Garnacho nor Pellestri are ready to start regularly. There's not really anyone else to play those positions (Mount possibly on the right?).
Garnacho has only had one PL start this season no?But we've tried.
When Garnacho starts he gets bullied out of the game.
Pellistri just runs around like headless chicken.
Last year after two games we saw pragmatic Ten Hag for the rest of the season. This season he is pushing through implementing a playstyle even though it has cost us points.I've mentioned it on this thread before but I find the lack of draws under him worthy of noting.
Of the 74 games he's managed us, we've only drawn 9 times, or about 12% of games. He has a decent win percentage (63.5% which is notably higher than any other Post-Fergie manager) but the problem is when we don't win then more often than not we lose.
I'd put that down to a lack of pragmatism, which is something the team need to learn as a couple of draws this season (we currently have 0) would put us 2 places further up the table.
For reference here are the other draw rates for previous managers:
Rangnick 34%
Solskjaer 22%
Mourinho 22%
Van Gaal 24%
Moyes 18%
For reference, Klopp is also 22% and Arteta around 16%. Pep is the closest at 13% but he also wins most of his games (72%)
I agree with this but think Ten Hag is to blame for trying to play a 433 with bad options as wingers.I watched a stream that had Ruud Gullitt as a pundit on Saturday. It may have been to a SouthAfrican audience. Anyway, post match he said the problem is he is trying to play 433 (like he did at Ajax) but his wing play is not servicing the main striker. Both Rashford and Antony "like to come in" and both can not cross to save their lives.
The only player that we have that is capable of crossing is at Getafe.
I think if he gets fully fit and impresses in training, Amad must surely have role in the side?