All that may be true but there’s very little chance Mac Allister would look this good at Chelsea and there’s every chance Enzo would look like a world beater in Klopp’s midfield.
The attributes you listed for Mac Allister are almost exactly the things Enzo is good at. I guarantee you if roles were reversed people would be saying there’s no chance I’d swap Enzo for Mac Allister.
Do you think Real Madrid would have bothered chasing Rudiger has Tuchel had not revitalised his career? The player he looked like under Lampard was a player headed towards a move to West Ham or back to Roma. Coaching and team structure is hugely important in how we should judge players is all I’m saying and a lot of these Chelsea players are at a huge disadvantage when they’re being compared to Arsenal and Liverpool players.
Yes Enzo might have look a lot better with Pool, yet...
Macca is more mature, has a better strike, more calm when the heat is on, he reads better the spaces and the game as whole, his tackles are more precise, strong and with better anticipation.
Enzo is more dinamic, tries a lot more long balls, he is more flamboyant (for the good and for the bad), he is comitted, generous but
he can be quite disorganized too.
Even more than the teams both are, because let's not forget that Liverpool had quite an overhaul and lots of injuries being quite a new team too.
Enzo at this point is simply more inmature, while even if he has a great attitude, if he doesn't start to mature more and have a better understanding of what he is going to bring and what role/s to play, he will tend to
try to do "more" than he has to do while ending doing less of
what he has to do; ending being caught off guard, hurrying a shot, doing a reckless tackling, etc.