TheGame
Full Member
300 is a pretty decent score I think.
Frustrating that it could have been much higher with the position they were in.
300 is a pretty decent score I think.
Who was the part time left armer who bowled decently in Ashes? Was it Malan or Stoneman?
YJB gone!
Buttler is in next though
Stokes looking excellent right now.
They all want it bad. Just throwing your arms around and shouting doesn't mean you want it any more than anyone else.I’ve never seen more of a competitor in cricket than Kohli. Maybe Shane Warne is up there too, but Kohli wants it so bad.
feck offCurran's an odd one. Yeah he's taken 100 FC wickets at 20 odd before he is 21, but does anyone watching him really think he's doing anything particularly special – or is he simply a fairly bog standard swing bowler?
Might as well get old man Darren Stevens in if we're going to start picking trundlers.
Edit: See KM, I can do jinx's too.
feck off
Think we've none in the squad of that type.Pack the side with dibbly dobbly bowlers imo.
Think we've none in the squad of that type.
Also, Dhawan should be sent home straight after this test.
No worries, i said the same thing.Curran's an odd one. Yeah he's taken 100 FC wickets at 20 odd before he is 21, but does anyone watching him really think he's doing anything particularly special – or is he simply a fairly bog standard swing bowler?
Might as well get old man Darren Stevens in if we're going to start picking trundlers.
Edit: See KM, I can do jinx's too.
No worries, i said the same thing.
Still don't see it with him. He might have days like this in English conditions but he'll get hammered when there's no swing. Obviously hope he produces this kind of form consistently but don't see it.
Best chance is as a batting all-rounder imo.
True. Philander's only about 78mph as well. They're very much the exception to the rule though aren't they. Plus both were hugely skilful and found ways to be effective.I'd like to see us stick with Curran purely for the change of angle and the amount of left-handers knocking about. He's never likely to be lightning quick but he's not exactly slow. Chaminda Vaas wasn't very quick and he did ok.
Speaking of pace though, i watched Jamie Overton bowl a spell the other week that was seriously rapid. If he stays fit he could be an option down the line.
He's also got novelty factor. That's wearing off with every ball he bowls.Tbh, despite taking wickets I still don't think he bowled that well. He was swining it from the hand at a gentle pace, if that takes you wickets in international cricket then it says more about the quality of the batsmen than it does Curran.
Yeah, Curran will need to learn some variations.True. Philander's only about 78mph as well. They're very much the exception to the rule though aren't they. Plus both were hugely skilful and found ways to be effective.
Rahane and Pujara need to be dropped for an entire series. They're simply included on reputation these days.Dreadful by Rahane. Like England, the majority of Indian players have thrown their wicket. Two mediocre sides.
Hold on, we have decent, young, medium/fast bowler coming through? Who is this Sam Curran guy anyway?
Rahane and Pujara need to be dropped for an entire series. They're simply included on reputation these days.
Dreadful by Rahane. Like England, the majority of Indian players have thrown their wicket. Two mediocre sides.
Plays for Surrey, brother of Tom who has played some ODIs for England.
Hasn't really been a clear number one test side since South Africa a few years ago.India are the number one ranked side in the world.
And that one. As if Malan's batting wasn't bad enough.We're going to regret that Kohli drop arent we?
Yeah not exactly covering himself in glory is he. Didn't make any runs and dropped their best player twice.And that one. As if Malan's batting wasn't bad enough.
Yeah not exactly covering himself in glory is he. Didn't make any runs and dropped their best player twice.
He's got to make runs second time round. Averaging 29 after 14 tests isn't good enough.
Hasn't really been a clear number one test side since South Africa a few years ago.
Thought India might take over but they've lacked the overall consistency and the success away from home that South Africa had. Best of a weak bunch at the moment.
Fully agree on their not being an obvious number one however think that is due to the gap between the teams being closer and there being no dominant team (e.g Australia. WI) rather than a bad bunch. The away form of all teams seems to be an issue in tests though.