Gavinb33
Full Member
Good lord, i turned it off as i thought it was going to be over come on the boys
Good lord, i turned it off as i thought it was going to be over come on the boys
Bar a few dropped chances Bairstow has been decent throughout the series.Unpopular opinion time. Bairstow came in undercooked and has done fine since the third test.
Surely England can’t take the new ball.
The stockbrokers who don't like cricket are starting to make some noise
I don’t think you can say that it’s just the cafBar a few dropped chances Bairstow has been decent throughout the series.
Just for some reason the Caf likes to find a target.
This game is well and truly on now, the Aussies have crumbled and England are running on pure adrenaline.
100 run partnership incoming now that you're back
80 overs bowled. When will England take their third new ball of the innings?
Here comes Broady! Really hope he gets one
I'm hoping for an Ali fiver!!
Unfortunately he's part of a certain group of English cricketers over the last few years who have their place assured (at least a large percentage of the time) until they decide to retire.
I'm not necessarily saying it's a terrible thing, that's just how it is.
Broad has been the same - been through some dreadful periods of form but never close to being dropped. Swann and Prior were untouchable too.
I have a horrible feeling he will just continue to deteriorate and become less effective going forward and he has to take the decision out of the other hands.
I'm not that optimistic about what follows because there are issues with temperament and injury records with a few of the next cabs off the rank.
But the Anderson of 2023 is not striking any fear in to opponents anymore, the Australians are petrified of Broad but not Anderson.
And I can't see a 41 year old Anderson being hugely effective in a five-test series in India early next year.
This was on the BBC.
“Where the decision on the Stokes catch is wrong is that England shouldn't have lost a review. They weren't reviewing whether the catch was clean, they were reviewing whether or not Steve Smith hit it. Then it is for the umpires to decide if it was taken cleanly.”
That’s why Stokes was reviewing. Not because the catch was given not out. You don’t review a catch.
With the way this test series has been it feels like this will go right down to the wire.