Sassy Colin
Death or the gladioli!
Brook was amazing in the last Test series, a real find. Seems to have gone completely off the boil against Australia.
Saw a discussion earlier in this thread that most English players went to private schools.
Is it because public schools don't have the facilities to support a relatively more expensive game? And does that mean England pick from a relatively smaller pool of players than they potentially could if the game was more widely played?
Massively so, the biggest loss being the British Asian kids who in the cities make up the vast majority of those you see playing cricket in the park but don't go to expensive schools.Saw a discussion earlier in this thread that most English players went to private schools.
Is it because public schools don't have the facilities to support a relatively more expensive game? And does that mean England pick from a relatively smaller pool of players than they potentially could if the game was more widely played?
It needs to start at primary school (5-11) plastic bat and those orange balls. By the time you get to secondary school, a lot of the better players are already playing club cricket anyway.Saw a discussion earlier in this thread that most English players went to private schools.
Is it because public schools don't have the facilities to support a relatively more expensive game? And does that mean England pick from a relatively smaller pool of players than they potentially could if the game was more widely played?
England should declare and have a go at the Aussie openers under lights.
Yes - Cricket is an expensive sport in England. Standard schools just don't have the budget to support it / the attendee's and their parents the budgets to encourage their kids to pursue it.
We have huge untapped potential in our Asian and Carribean heritage population. Let alone more widespread.
And ofcourse we are just obsessed with football. I went to a state school and all everyone wanted to do every term was play football, whether it be summer or winter.
Honours even I think. Another great day of Cricket.
I think this is marginally Australia's day.
They should have been bowled out for around 180-200, but they managed quite a few more. 260 just seems like a good score here.
So far, Australia have held onto everything and that could be the difference - holding onto catches. They do drop catches as well but you don't expect four from them, or someone to drop an absolute gimme.
The likes of Wood, Bairstow, Stokes come across as being pretty working class in the interviews. I thought private schools were just for the richer families
It’s genuinely annoying that fielding is kind of deciding this series. England have been shocking in the field and deserve to lose honestly
I think this is marginally Australia's day.
They should have been bowled out for around 180-200, but they managed quite a few more. 260 just seems like a good score here.
So far, Australia have held onto everything and that could be the difference - holding onto catches. They do drop catches as well but you don't expect four from them, or someone to drop an absolute gimme.
Thing is, you don’t really want Root in during the first few overs, and I reckon it’s about 75% chance of that happening right now if he bats at three. But yes, Brook just seems a walking wicket at three and it’s a bit of a waste.I feel for Brook a bit. He's never a test 3, is he? It really should be Root. Root has all the attributes to be a 3. Good technique, plays it late. Harry Brook does not. He's a dasher. Better at 4 or 5. I completely blame the management for putting him in that situation where he's facing the new ball with Cummings and co charging in.
If they've got a ball with Root's name on it then what chance have the others got given how late Root plays it and the fact he actually has a defence? It just means you've got a higher chance of going 2 down for not many with Brook coming in. He could be damaging later against the older ball.Thing is, you don’t really want Root in during the first few overs, and I reckon it’s about 75% chance of that happening right now if he bats at three. But yes, Brook just seems a walking wicket at three and it’s a bit of a waste.
I think this is marginally Australia's day.
They should have been bowled out for around 180-200, but they managed quite a few more. 260 just seems like a good score here.
So far, Australia have held onto everything and that could be the difference - holding onto catches. They do drop catches as well but you don't expect four from them, or someone to drop an absolute gimme.
There is no doubt I would have less gripes with this team IF a few things had happened which are
Found a way to play Foakes & Bairstow
Managed Archer better earlier in career
Practiced catching not playing Golf
I feel for Woody because probably took him longer than he wanted to sort out run up issue which blighted his early test career
From this XI, could have just used Root as the spinner and Foakes in for Ali.The only way Bairstow and Foakes play is that either Stokes can bowl or they probably drop one of the opening batsmen.
From this XI, could have just used Root as the spinner and Foakes in for Ali.
He seems a great guy
Because he like most people assumed that Green would play all 5 tests.Am I the only one who has no idea what he was talking about with the UK holiday line? Saw loads of people laughing about it online.
Made it look so easy batting yesterday though so fair play to him. We’ll need someone to come in and do something similar today.
Because he like most people assumed that Green would play all 5 tests.
The Bison made it look easy and made a lot of Aussies eat humble pie last night.