croadyman
Full Member
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2018
- Messages
- 39,088
Bazball really has revived test cricket in England
Yes it has but doesn't make these two defeats any easier to stomach whatsoever
Bazball really has revived test cricket in England
Fair.
The umpire looking here or there is irrelevant though - unless he called over as soon as the ball hit Carey's hands, this is a moot point. Even if he was looking at the action, it would have gone to the 3rd umpire to give the final decision anyway.
Being brutally honest, if the roles were reversed, everyone here would be slapping each other on the back saying it's clever play by Bairstow. Because England are on the receiving end, you feel hard done by (and I probably would if it was my team, but my team do stupid things multiple times in a year, so I'm desensitised).
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-66089658
Rishi Sunak has accused Australia of breaking the spirit of cricket over the controversial dismissal of England's Jonny Bairstow on Sunday.
Asked on Monday whether Mr Sunak believed Australia's actions were not in keeping with the spirit of cricket, his spokesman said: "Yes".
"The prime minister agrees with Ben Stokes. He said he simply wouldn't want to win a game in the manner Australia did," the spokesman added.
I'll be honest, I don't remotely trust England cricketers not to be proud to have Tory PM's on their side.
Aren’t like 50% of them from private schools?I'll be honest, I don't remotely trust England cricketers not to be proud to have Tory PM's on their side.
There's one lad on my football team that also plays cricket and he manages to bring up some tax avoidance thing he's looking into (and has been for at least two years) at every single social.
Aren’t like 50% of them from private schools?
Aren’t like 50% of them from private schools?
Would have imagined more. Cricket is largely unknown now in state schools. Thanks to Tory PMs who love cricket.
I'm a bit surprised by the backlash against England for a legitimate grouse--especially when it's at the hands of the Aussies. Have people already forgotten what a bunch of twats they have been in the past? The Atletico Madrid of cricket.
I feel like the amount of time spend looking in to it probably indicates its highly dubious legality.
Strauss and Morgan are boring commentators. I hope they were dropping in only for the Lord's test
Strauss and Morgan are boring commentators. I hope they were dropping in only for the Lord's test
Don’t worry Dinesh Karthik coming in soon
Really?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-66089658
Rishi Sunak has accused Australia of breaking the spirit of cricket over the controversial dismissal of England's Jonny Bairstow on Sunday.
Asked on Monday whether Mr Sunak believed Australia's actions were not in keeping with the spirit of cricket, his spokesman said: "Yes".
"The prime minister agrees with Ben Stokes. He said he simply wouldn't want to win a game in the manner Australia did," the spokesman added.
tbh, he's a better at commentary than batting, DK.Really?
tbh, he's a better at commentary than batting, DK.
Why do you think so many get knighthoods.Aren’t like 50% of them from private schools?
This post sums my thoughts upCarey was doing it in fairly good faith.
Cummins should have seen Bairstows actions and retracted the appeal.
Think that's me done on this one.
Strauss and Morgan are boring commentators. I hope they were dropping in only for the Lord's test
Don't want to sound cynical but he only seems to be around when he wants to collect money for his charity.
Cook and Strauss getting one is proper weird, agreed.Why do you think so many get knighthoods.
I'm still at a loss why cook and strauss got one! I thought strauss one might be for charity work but apparently it wasn't.
I've tuned out of the media so thankfully have not heard any more discourse about that tedious event. PM being asked about it ffs. No wonder they call us whinging poms.
Its obvious why cook got one. Strauss is oddCook and Strauss getting one is proper weird, agreed.
Two posh lads. Although, it is also a sign of the modern times as Gower never got one and he was a superior player to both! And it took botham decades of chairty work to get his.Its obvious why cook got one. Strauss is odd
You got a link? I've been assuming there was some nasty stuff, given the MCC had to suspend three members almost immediately, but I've not seen anything as yet.New footage emerging of Uzzie getting targeted in the long room
Behind a paywall but I’ll try and get it.You got a link? I've been assuming there was some nasty stuff, given the MCC had to suspend three members almost immediately, but I've not seen anything as yet.
A nation cries "Wither Cricket"
Does the spirit of the game include knowing what the actual rules are?
Section 2.21: You are still out if the other fellow is a cad or a bounder
I was so cross I ordered my manservant to go over and jostle them.
First Dog on the Moon sums it up.
https://www.theguardian.com/comment...it-of-the-game-a-nation-cries-whither-cricket
Is Justin Langer doing commentary for sky? Heard him during the WTC final. My god he was fecking dull. I'd prefer KP over him.
I think that the focus on Bazball + the Bairstow incident is taking away from the fact that Australia are simply a better team. There's people saying "This isn't how England played 12 months ago", "England can tweak their attacking approach a bit", and a lot of noise about the Bairstow incident.. playing a good team was always going to be a test of a tactic which relies on aggressive shot making and it's coming up short. I don't think it's a big surprise - Australia are just very good.
The McCullum interview of "We're galvanized by this" is symptomatic of this. The series score reads 2-0.
I think this is a fair assumption, albeit an obvious one. Australia are the number one team for a reason, they are very very good.I think that the focus on Bazball + the Bairstow incident is taking away from the fact that Australia are simply a better team. There's people saying "This isn't how England played 12 months ago", "England can tweak their attacking approach a bit", and a lot of noise about the Bairstow incident.. playing a good team was always going to be a test of a tactic which relies on aggressive shot making and it's coming up short. I don't think it's a big surprise - Australia are just very good.
The McCullum interview of "We're galvanized by this" is symptomatic of this. The series score reads 2-0.
Assuming it’s this, which doesn’t really give any insight to what was said.You got a link? I've been assuming there was some nasty stuff, given the MCC had to suspend three members almost immediately, but I've not seen anything as yet.
I actually thought there wasn't much between the two teams either initially both are bit flawed, Australia haven't exactly pressed on the advantage when they were in front but thats being ignored while expecting English to cut down the mistakes to get better . And Australia did have the worst of the conditions in this game while also losing a frontline bowler as well.I think this is a fair assumption, albeit an obvious one. Australia are the number one team for a reason, they are very very good.
However, I have to say England are really not far behind.
England have made mistakes more than Austria have and that's why Australia are two up in the series.