groovyalbert
it's a mute point
England's batting options simply aren't good enough for this level. The fact that none of Root, Stokes or Bairstow have been able to develop into a top 3 batsman is pretty damning too.
England's batting options simply aren't good enough for this level. The fact that none of Root, Stokes or Bairstow have been able to develop into a top 3 batsman is pretty damning too.
Notice how the chirps from the Indian die-hards have subsided now New Zealand's middle order have established a partnership from a tricky position, thus proving what we had said at stumps day one, that there was nothing wrong with the pitch at all. In fact, it might even be the ideal test wicket.
You get pace and carry on day one and into day two and some extra movement for the seamers. After that, batting gets progressively easier over the middle part of the test, before day four and five sees the pitch deteriorating, which brings spinners into the equation. Crucially, with this kind of genuine test wicket, it is not always a 'no brainer' to bat first. A captain can take a calculated risk and say that if you bowl the opposition out cheaply, you might get the better of the batting conditions for your first dig (which England did get, and which they duly spurned), but in doing so, you risk having to bat last. It makes for an interesting test, generally.
This is in no way comparable to Ahmedabad deliberately serving up a dusty mess of a wicket that rags square from ball one and keeps on turning and deteriorating until the match wraps up.
No he shouldn’t he is clearly better at number 4. Root is not the problem.Root should bat 3 to be honest.
Root should bat 3 to be honest.
England's batting options simply aren't good enough for this level. The fact that none of Root, Stokes or Bairstow have been able to develop into a top 3 batsman is pretty damning too.
3 should be Crawley for me. He’s not an opener.Root should bat 3 to be honest.
No he shouldn’t he is clearly better at number 4. Root is not the problem.
Bairstow bowled yet again, he's such a dope sometimes.
This lot are absolutely fecking useless. We had them 40-7 and were at one point 90-2 and look like we're going to lose heavily.
Root and Stokes are the only test quality batsmen we have.
It obviously won't happen but I'd be tempted to go full knee-jerk.
Compton
Jennings
Bohannon
Root
Brook
Stokes
Stokes and Root have got many runs so far against New Zealand??
Sorry, but both deserve criticism for the amount of runs they have got, they are not free from being criticised.
3 should be Crawley for me. He’s not an opener.
Of course the problem then is that we also don’t have any openers.
I saw footage of Compton’s hundred vs New Zealand, they started testing him with short stuff and he didn’t look comfortable. Definitely need to get Brook in the middle order and pick between Bairstow/Foakes for the gloves.
Tough to expect an all rounder like Stokes to also bat in the top 3.
Wait, so because Root and Stokes haven't scored many runs in this test they aren't test quality? Are you insane?
Is Williamson not good enough either then?
Stokes hasn't taken too many wickets with the ball, nor scored too many runs recently, when was his last good game??
Root failed to get a 100 in Australia, and hasn't done much since.
Has he past his peak, that is the big question now.
Stokes hasn't taken too many wickets with the ball, nor scored too many runs recently, when was his last good game??
Root failed to get a 100 in Australia, and hasn't done much since.
Has he past his peak, that is the big question now.
Stokes hasn't taken too many wickets with the ball, nor scored too many runs recently, when was his last good game??
Root failed to get a 100 in Australia, and hasn't done much since.
Has he past his peak, that is the big question now.
They both scored 100s in their last test series
He's trying so hard to get out.Stokes needs to settle down.
It obviously won't happen but I'd be tempted to go full knee-jerk.
Compton
Jennings
Bohannon
Root
Brook
Stokes
I’d bring back James Vince before Dawid Malan, and as I mentioned earlier Crawley to my eye just looks more like a number 3.How about Malan back at 3?
I'd stick with Crawley for now...
Compton
Crawley
Malan
Root
Brook
Stokes
Foakes/Bairstow
I’m firmly in the camp of ‘best batter bats where they’re at their best’, no need to complicate it further than that.
It’s a bit daft to stick steadfastly to “best batter at 3” because there’s literally zero reasoning to it beyond it’s what has always been done (which even then it suddenly wasn’t important if the best batter was an opener), was Trott England’s best batter? Is Pujara India’s best batter now? Labushagne Australia?Well, enjoy the revolving door of the top 3 then. Also Root’s best average is @ 5.
That's a huge wicket, just when that flurry of runs moved it slightly in our favour. Root needs to hang around now, but probably game over.