ArmchairCritic
You got pets me too mines are dead
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2011
- Messages
- 16,307
I think he’s poorly managed. I think they shouldn’t pick him if he doesn’t fit their plans. Picking him and asking him to bowl express pace when he doesn’t seem comfortable doing that seems not right. There is just too much written and spoken about him for a guy who has ten tests.
To be fair, for this test England said they wanted him to just bowl fast and they've bowled him in short spells to allow him to do that and he bowled quick yesterday. Today he appears to be more of an enforcer a la Stokes but the pitch is just dead. I don't think it's the best usage of his skill set but at least there's some synchronisation between player, coach and captain.
I agree there's far too much written about him and that's where England could be a bit more in terms of controlling the narrative around him. Considering we have spent the last few years as a cricketing nation extolling the virtues of Broad and Anderson it's a bit frustrating that pundits and fans appear to have collective amnesia about how long they took to fully settle into test match cricket.