JohnnyKills
Full Member
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2016
- Messages
- 7,115
Lack of options right now. Imagine Crawley will cement his place long-term but not many options atmNo idea how Sibley is still being picked
Lack of options right now. Imagine Crawley will cement his place long-term but not many options atmNo idea how Sibley is still being picked
He'd definitely be in our side!!!!For me, one of the best all rounders in Test cricket. Absolutely staggering he is not playing.
Lack of options right now. Imagine Crawley will cement his place long-term but not many options atm
I get Ian bell vibes from Crawley
He'd definitely be in our side!!!!
Wish we had a spinner who has taken 400 plus wickets. Ohh wait we have but not in playing 11 because Kohli thinks playing 4 pacers is cool. Said it not playing ashwin was joke of a decision.It's almost as if the bowling attack is missing something...
Root looks on course to get a big big score. Can he get to 200?
Probably depends how well Buttler can support him. First target is getting through this new ball period without losing another wicket.
It feels like England are just as likely to end up 50 runs behind as they are 50 runs ahead.
Probably depends how well Buttler can support him. First target is getting through this new ball period without losing another wicket.
It feels like England are just as likely to end up 50 runs behind as they are 50 runs ahead.
Looks like England will get a 80-runs lead here. Between lunch and tea, they’ve gone at about 4 runs an over. That’s very good batting.
What an innings by Root and what bravery by Jimmy at the end . Two of the best ever
Anderson as a bowler for longevity - yes. His average etc. outside England isn't best ever worthy though, and neither is his overall language.
Not what I said. I said that imo he isn't in the "best ever" conversation. Not that he isn't a great bowlerHe averages 27 in Asia with 74 wickets, not far off in averages from Steyn with 92 wickets at 24 or McGrath 72 wickets at 23. He didn't set Asia on fire like Steyn at Nagpur but since UAE 2012 he's become very adept at bowling dry + reverse, and has an extremely low economy rate(lowest of the three). It's hardly a record that throws up a contrast that'd question his credentials -- this was true 12 years ago, it's not been true for a long time now. He also has a substantially better bowling average in Asia than Zaheer Khan(164 wickets at 34), who is considered one of the greats of Indian bowling.
Saying Anderson is good as a bowler for his 'longevity' is damning him with faint praise -- it'd be similar to saying Sachin was good for his longevity. They had longevity, sure, but that's not what makes/made them special.
Agreed, both incredible players but you would swap them historically for a few others.Anderson as a bowler for longevity - yes. His average etc. outside England isn't best ever worthy though, and neither is his overall language.
Root as a batsman - not even close to England's best.
Who is in the conversation then according to you?Not what I said. I said that imo he isn't in the "best ever" conversation. Not that he isn't a great bowler
Anderson as a bowler for longevity - yes. His average etc. outside England isn't best ever worthy though, and neither is his overall language.
Root as a batsman - not even close to England's best.