I don't understand how people are easily dismissing this as a pitch that simply won't last 5 days. We batted for 180+ overs across both innings - could have been 200+ if we didn't go all guns blazing post Kohli's dismissal. How is it the pitch's fault that England have lost 13 wickets in less than 80 overs? At the very worst, it would be unplayable on day five - that happens many times, on many pitches all across the world. If England had won the toss and the shoe was on the other foot - do you think Agnew's column would be the same?
Moaning about the pitch and the umpires with a customary footnote of 'not taking credit away from India' is a sore loser's way of actually not giving credit to India. It is disrespectful to Rohit Sharma's classy century, it is disrespectful to Pant's cameos and keeping skills, it is disrespectful to India's young bowlers in Axar and Siraj and it is mostly disrespectful to Ashwin's brilliant 5-fer and gritty hundred. And that to me is way more 'bang out of order' than Kohli being aggressive with an umpire. You can punish 'unprofessionalism' with a fine, how do you punish decades of entitlement and condescension?
That said, I hope there is green on the pitch in the pink ball test, with reverse swing late into the night. I have tickets for day four and five, and would love to see Indian pacers replicate the spinner's exploits in person. Wonder what the columns on BBC will complain about, then.