Acole9
Outstanding
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2013
- Messages
- 12,507
If England don't get to the semi finals minimum then I think he has to go.Anyone think it could be Southgates last tournament? Then again who could england go for?
If England don't get to the semi finals minimum then I think he has to go.Anyone think it could be Southgates last tournament? Then again who could england go for?
I feel like he's such a bad choice when you consider the generation of players England have now. The squad is good enough to compete with France and Germany.If England don't get to the semi finals minimum then I think he has to go.
I think he's using the extra 6 days so he can monitor the condition of Maguire, Pope, Phillips and Grealish.Why is southgate stringing this out, a lot of the other nations have named their 26 already
Why is southgate stringing this out, a lot of the other nations have named their 26 already
Any of England's 4 right backs, for starters.
I think he's using the extra 6 days so he can monitor the condition of Maguire, Pope, Phillips and Grealish.
If England don't get to the semi finals minimum then I think he has to go.
Or if he wins it!If England don't get to the semi finals minimum then I think he has to go.
Semi Finals minimum or a huge failure.
With the talented young players they have there are no excuses. I saw Southgate on the news downplaying it all but I really think any less than semi final he has to go.Are you implying England has to eliminate France/Germany/Portugal (you are facing them before Semifinals)?
When was the last time England eliminated a strong/traditional side in a knock out match?
1966 WC?
I feel negativity is going to cost us. Southgate's tactics of playing with no attacking midfielder has created a lot of problems for the team in the qualifiers. There is just too much of a gap.
[
This would be absolute madness. Attacking midfield is the strongest position in English football by a country mile.
Foden, Mount, Grealish, Lingard, Maddison, Willock, Barkley just off the top of my head. I'm sure there are a couple I've missed out.
Only Southgate could look at that lot and think "let's play without an attacking midfielder".
it's actually good for united. fresh feet, regeneration and all thatIt's a bit concerning that we spent £50m on a guy who isn't in the first 4 options for England at right back.
Surprised Lingard staying in ahead of Greenwood if true. Would say it's between Greenwood/Saka/JWP/Lingard for the last 2 spots anyway, surprised Saka and Lingard are the 2 and not Greenwood and JWP. Especially JWP. England literally have Henderson and Rice in midfield who have been injured a fair bit this season, and then Kalvin Phillips who play deeper in midfield. The rest are defenders/fullbacks/attacking midfielders or wingers. Strange to not add a goalscorer like Greenwood in there or a proper central midfielder like JWP in case an injury happens.So based on reports
Ramsdale
Godfrey
White
Trent
Greenwood
Watkins
Ward-Prowse (So conflicting reports already Sky/EPSN saying Ward-Prowse goes but Athletic so no)
Greenwood and Trent should both be going but Southgate has treated both players badly. The way he handle the Greenwood/Foden situation was very poor and now hes gonna pick him to boot him out again.
I feel like he's such a bad choice when you consider the generation of players England have now. The squad is good enough to compete with France and Germany.
Ok. Who else would you have?
They would realistically have the choice between Lampard, Howe, Dyche, Gerrard, Potter, Dean Smith, Wilder, or Parker if they went with a English manager.
Not a great list but most if not all of them have a better track record than Southgate, and most have shown more tactical nous.
If they went with a foreigner, I reckon Benitez would be a good choice for them. Not sure how the media would act around him though.
Thank you.
At the moment, I don't have a problem with Southgate and I do believe that managing a national team has some differences to that of a club side.
But I do accept that if he is not able to get us to at least the semis then serious questions will be asked.
Dropping Greenwood would be criminal.
Someone that is more attack minded? Someone who picks players on merit and not just sticking to his favs?Ok. Who else would you have?
I don't know, we have plenty of goals in the team. Greenwood is a superb finisher but aside from this he doesn't offer much over the existing options.
Knowing Southgate, he would stick with the wing back system, so he doesn't really need a wing attacker to provide that width on the right as much.DCL and Watkins are extremely erratic finishers. Rashford and Sterling are in really poor form, and Grealish, Mount and Saka are more creators than scorers. Greenwood and Saka are the only attacking options better on the right than the left, and I'd use both as options off the bench depending on the situation. Greenwood if you need a goal, Saka if you want someone to get up and down and help fullback more.
Greenwood offers more variety on the right than Rashford does on the left who'll not offer much different to Sancho and Sterling. I'd 100% leave Rashford out with the games and minutes he's played this season, form and injuries
I think from a finishing perspective, we have enough firepower to put the ball in the back of the net. I see us struggling less on converting chances, and struggling more on finding the right players to unpick a defence. Be it a low block (Grealish would be great here) or a counter attach at pace (Rashford at pace is apt here).DCL and Watkins are extremely erratic finishers. Rashford and Sterling are in really poor form, and Grealish, Mount and Saka are more creators than scorers. Greenwood and Saka are the only attacking options better on the right than the left, and I'd use both as options off the bench depending on the situation. Greenwood if you need a goal, Saka if you want someone to get up and down and help fullback more.
Greenwood offers more variety on the right than Rashford does on the left who'll not offer much different to Sancho and Sterling. I'd 100% leave Rashford out with the games and minutes he's played this season, form and injuries
No way Lingard should be in the final squad ahead of other options. He was only picked in the last one due to injuries. England should be looking at playing Trent in midfield, similar to Lahm. Think he would do well there but Southgate will never consider it.
Possibly, but not he shouldn't be trying this experiment at a major tournament. I'd be interested to see how it goes, but it would need to be in qualifiers, nations league or friendlies first.No way Lingard should be in the final squad ahead of other options. He was only picked in the last one due to injuries. England should be looking at playing Trent in midfield, similar to Lahm. Think he would do well there but Southgate will never consider it.