Leg-End
Full Member
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2004
- Messages
- 19,863
Does it matter? England are not winning the Euros anyway with a manager like Southgate. Happy to bet any amount on that.
55 years and counting, fairly safe bet in any circumstance.
Does it matter? England are not winning the Euros anyway with a manager like Southgate. Happy to bet any amount on that.
I find it bonkers that people think the omission of JWP, Lingard and Watkins is tournament ending for England. Arguably Gareth has picked the best 26 available to him given the circumstances.
Hopefully he'll wise up with his tactics. If he plays 3 at the back with 2 DMs then we'll be in trouble. I hope he goes with two box-to-box midfielders in front of 3 CBs.
How many teams should be in the tournament? Should it just be a single match between France and Germany?Does it matter? England are not winning the Euros anyway with a manager like Southgate. Happy to bet any amount on that.
I'm not a massive fan of Southgate but that's not fair given he got us into the semi-final of a World Cup, which was a game we really should have won, too.
Your first 11 is mental - you have 3 central defenders with 2 of them playing out of position. You have a 17 year old playing in central midfield also. This also highlights just how poor the midfield options are for England - you have Henderson who probably isn't fit and a 17 year old in there (yes he is talented but he should be there for backup at most) and 3 other midfielders out of a possible 5 yet he can find space for 4 right backs. This must be the most unbalanced squad I can remember.First XI
Henderson
James---Maguire---Shaw
TAA-----------------------------------------Saka
Rice----Bellingham
Sancho------------------------Grealish
Kane
Second XI
Pickford
Walker---Coady---Stones
Trippier-----------------------------------------Chilwell
Henderson----Mount
Foden------------------------Rashford
DCL
Spare players in case of injury, loss of form or rest: Johnstone, Mings, Phillips, Sterling
We could do with stronger options at CB. But, overall, that's very strong.
Not sure if the squad numbers give a hint to the pecking order but:
How many teams should be in the tournament? Should it just be a single match between France and Germany?
How many teams should be in the tournament? Should it just be a single match between France and Germany?
That first 11 players including the goalkeeper look like a team that will start the opening game barring injures
The draw helped you too in fairnessI'm not a massive fan of Southgate but that's not fair given he got us into the semi-final of a World Cup, which was a game we really should have won, too.
Yeah. He's literally our best player and we're not so bad. I'm definitely biased but Kalvin is absolutely mint.
Hopefully England do just enough to ensure Waistcoat gets a new long-term contract. Win R16 on penalties and narrow heroic loss in QFs should be enough?
The draw helped you too in fairness
No it is football and there is room for low probability events, like Villarreal beating us in the final. My statement is based on my perception of the probabilities. I can obviously be wrong.
Do people think that if he took one less RB and Watkins or JWP instead, the probability of England winning the Euros increases significantly?
That caption is so embarrassing
No of course, and the professional nature of dispatching Sweden as well as getting through a shoot out have to be commended, but it’s still a factor to considerStill had to win them, no?
That caption is so embarrassing
Watkins has so much more to his game than DCL, who's a tap in merchant who's very good at headers.DCL is a better player than Watkins pretty easily. Having said that, Watkins should be going in place of one of the bloody right backs.
Anything but a group stage exit will see him keep his job I expect, the FA seem to absolutely love him for some reason.
The nation will turn on him this summer, I'd love to be wrong and us have a great tournament though.
No chance of group exit. These days you only need 3 points to qualify. Portugal qualified without winning a game in 2016.
That caption is so embarrassing
He lucked out with the draw and went out against the first decent team they played against.I'm not a massive fan of Southgate but that's not fair given he got us into the semi-final of a World Cup, which was a game we really should have won, too.
Someone please explain to me just how Southgate can justify leaving Henderson in the Euro squad????
I mean, did we expect anything else from Southgate. A squad picked on reputation not merit for the most part.I can't get my head around the 4 RB's really, especially if he sees a couple of them as right sided centre backs. We've either got a load of RB's, or a load of CB's where only some of them can do a "job" in that position. Whilst sacrificing the middle of the park and up top.
I think Greenwood being injured will be a big miss as well. Outside of Kane, we're missing that one player who you'd bet your house on scoring.
He's in according to that post.Someone please explain to me just how Southgate can justify leaving Henderson in the Euro squad????
He's a clown, worse than Rodgers. Very hard to wish him and this team well.He lucked out with the draw and went out against the first decent team they played against.
He's crap.
Which one? Both deserve to be in, there aren't any better alternatives.
I mean, did we expect anything else from Southgate. A squad picked on reputation not merit for the most part.