Depends on your definition I guess. I'd probably agree that Stokes at his very best is better than Woakes at his very best, and he's certainly shown more in an England shirt, (he has that ability to produce moments of insane magic) and his bowling is still improving of course, but in terms of base level I think theres very little in the way of argument that Woakes is the consistently better bowler right now.
There's a reason that Woakes has taken close to double the amount of first class wickets than Stokes has, at a considerably better average, in about 20 odd more games.