Ole's_toe_poke
Ole_Aged_Slow_Poke
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2009
- Messages
- 36,846
Compton is toast if he doesn't make a huge score in the second innings.
Not sure who they'll bring in though.
Not sure who they'll bring in though.
Compton is toast if he doesn't make a huge score in the second innings.
Not sure who they'll bring in though.
If bring in Robson for Compton
Or look at Vince up and Buttler in
He'll get the next test surely?
This needs to be stopped.Time for some patented Jimmy Anderson reverse sweeping
Edit: Boom. Reverse Sweep to get off the mark.
This needs to be stopped.
Declare, now!
Cook agreed with you, it would seem.I'm not sure I massively understand what I'm watching right now.
The push to 500 sure, but neither player is particularly fussed with getting on with it and the Sri Lankans aren't at all bothered with trying to get wickets.
Surely we're in hit out or get out territory?
Think we've already got enough for an innings win, sadly.
Imagine Woakes will nip in with some cheap wickets here. Might be just what he needs. He's not in the same league as Stokes but could be a useful backup in the years ahead.
Would love to see Ian Bell back for the next test. Watching him bat is basically cricket porn.
Not sure we need a bowler who can bat though. We already have three high-class specialist bowlers in Broad, Finn and Anderson so the fourth seamer isn't required to bowl that much. Stokes' batting is worth more to us than Woakes' bowling.I hope for Woakes sake that he had a better England career than that.
He might not have shown it in an England shirt yet but he is a better bowler than Stokes and very much a bowler who can bat rather than a genuine allrounder like Stokes.
Woakes badly needs a run in the side but I genuinely think hes got Jimmy Anderson's successor written all over him.
I think he's arguing Woakes will make it as a bowler, if he makes it, rather than as back up to Stokes as an allrounder.Not sure we need a bowler who can bat though. We already have three high-class specialist bowlers in Broad, Finn and Anderson so the fourth seamer isn't required to bowl that much. Stokes' batting is worth more to us than Woakes' bowling.
Think Woakes will have a good career, just can't see him ever being a guaranteed starter for England.
The problem (well, not a problem really) is that our bowling attack is lethal on all but the flattest pitches. In the last year we've knocked over the oppo for under a hundred three times, which is pretty incredible. It's not England's fault the competition (bar Aus, SA and NZ) is pretty weak at the momentSri Lanka suck. Crap series.
I think the Pakistan one will be similar. The sub-continent batsmen can't handle the slightest movement.
Yeah but the comparison was between Stokes and Woakes though. Anyway, hopefully we're both making valid points.I think he's arguing Woakes will make it as a bowler, if he makes it, rather than as back up to Stokes as an allrounder.
Not sure we need a bowler who can bat though. We already have three high-class specialist bowlers in Broad, Finn and Anderson so the fourth seamer isn't required to bowl that much. Stokes' batting is worth more to us than Woakes' bowling.
Think Woakes will have a good career, just can't see him ever being a guaranteed starter for England.
He's improved massively but I wouldn't call him high-class at the moment tbh. In fact is rate Stokes' bowling ahead of his - Stokes I'd more likely to get a high-class international player out than Woakes IMHO. Hopefully Woakes will keep developing though.What DOTA said; It's just a bonus is what I mean. He's a genuinely high class swing bowler who knows how to hold a bat. But he's not a like for like replacement for Stokes (hence why he's come in at 8 and everyones moved up).
I think he's more than capable of having a successful England career but if he does its going to be as a bowler, his batting, whilst good, isn't good enough to make him a genuine all rounder.
Think they might but more because it'll be later in the season than because they're better.Awful Sri Lankan team. Doubt the Pakistani batsman will do much better. Although their bowlers will be more of a challenge.
He's improved massively but I wouldn't call him high-class at the moment tbh. In fact is rate Stokes' bowling ahead of his - Stokes I'd more likely to get a high-class international player out than Woakes IMHO. Hopefully Woakes will keep developing though.