Skills
Snitch
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2012
- Messages
- 43,185
Dhoni
Wasn't it supposed to be a "no-brainer" to chase here? Historically as well as recently, Cuttack was supposed to favour chasing side due to heavy amount of dew in the evening. I've only read the preview prior to the game and haven't checked score after 25/3 until now. Dhoni-Yuvi wow!You get the feeling England didn't even see the pitch before deciding to bowl. Stupid decision.
Wasn't it supposed to be a "no-brainer" to chase here? Historically as well as recently, Cuttack was supposed to favour chasing side due to heavy amount of dew in the evening. I've only read the preview prior to the game and haven't checked score after 25/3 until now. Dhoni-Yuvi wow!
Dunno. Not really watching the game but I'd rather put up 350+ than chase it that's for sure.
Then how can you comment on the decision to bowl first?
I don't think it matters what you do when you bowl like England did today.
Because it's a seemingly belter of a pitch from what I've read. Didn't know about the dew though so might be a factor but then again Rashid was dropped anyway
65 metre sixes, flat pitches. Typical boring Indian wicket. Indian batsmen's average should be void from the records because they play the majority of their cricket at home and its just so dreary.
65 metre sixes, flat pitches. Typical boring Indian wicket. Indian batsmen's average should be void from the records because they play the majority of their cricket at home and its just so dreary.
Twenty20 yes, but i still think there's a place for challenging pitches in 50 over cricket. Still a place for a close game featuring totals in the 240's off 50 overs.Are you serious? You think England scored 450 at Melbourne? They amassed that total at Trent Bridge where on side of the completely flat wicket is around 50m in distance...
ODI cricket should be played on flat wickets - the challenging pitches are for test matches.
Just started watching. Have India been bowling this badly all innings?
Does that ever work? I've always been fond of the theory but so often I've seen it tried and the player just gets carried away and hits two boundaries before getting stumped/bowled having a horrible hack.I would have sent Stokes in to have a whack here. Morgan is a sponge and just soaks up dot balls in the middle order.
RR is fine atm, but it could quickly get out of hand.
Does that ever work? I've always been fond of the theory but so often I've seen it tried and the player just gets carried away and hits two boundaries before getting stumped/bowled having a horrible hack.
Changes everything.
Wouldn't mind the idea of Stokes being our number four and seeing how it goes. Though, I'm imagining this going along with Morgan being dropped, someone like Billings going in at five and Root being made captain. So, not exactly a nice easy change I'm suggesting.
Twenty20 yes, but i still think there's a place for challenging pitches in 50 over cricket. Still a place for a close game featuring totals in the 240's off 50 overs.
So, 240 pitches are the ones that used to produce 180. They were often good games.240? Pitches that produced 240 back in day will produce 300 these days. Batsmen are quite simply a lot better at hitting the ball these days than they were previously. Game has moved on and people need to move on with it.
240? Pitches that produced 240 back in day will produce 300 these days. Batsmen are quite simply a lot better at hitting the ball these days than they were previously. Game has moved on and people need to move on with it.
He did, I think. I heard 'impact outside - stick with your original decision'.I don't know what was worse with that review, the third umpire not spotting the green 'IMPACT OUTSIDE' or the standing umpire having a mare and not knowing you can't signal leg byes because the ball was dead as soon as he lifted his finger, add to that he had no idea what signal to make when you are reversing your decision. Couple of absolute numpties.
It's not just India pitches around the world have got flatter, i don't like it either, would prefer more balance between bat and ball, but it's the way it is now. It's one of the reasons i've gone off cricket over the years. Although i did enjoy the Eng vs Pak series last summer.