That'sHernandez
Ominously close to getting banned
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2010
- Messages
- 24,683
Packet of crisps and a Mars Bar
What the feck did this cnut actually come back for?
What the feck did this cnut actually come back for?
Do you think it's possible he has just been in constant transit, because of our random bid launches? Like everytime he nears England, we put in another bid for Fabregas and then the plane has to turn around again? Maybe this is how we conduct our transfers post-Ferguson, our chief executive, probably equipped with his own private plane and player radar technology, spends the entire transfer window in the air on standby incase we enter advanced negotions with a player?
Maybe he was flying in the Heart of Gold from Hitchhiker's Guide. He had issues with the improbability drive and thought we had a bid accepted for Messi.
If this is indeed true, it means...
We have to bid £42 million for Fabregas. I KNEW IT.
To the Fab-thread!!!
Can we get Gill back, as this Eddie chap seems to be a bit clueless, not to mention he got himself lost on the way back from Oz.
Lying bastard...
You do realise don't you that we haven't just picked up a random guy from the street and installed him as the CEO. I am not sure why you are blaming him anyway
Exactly. David Gill never failed to get a target signed nor made us wait until August to get a player we wanted. The sack is to good for this clown. String him up I say.He didn't complete the Valera signing right?
If not, we should setup a page akin to 'Has Torres Scored', except it's 'Has Manchester United Chief Executive Ed Woodward signed more footballers than you?'
Answer so far is no.
Just shocking stuff from the Glazers/the board. They should have paid 1m as a bonus to Gill to keep him on through Fergie's transition. Can you imagine a Fortune 100 company hiring a new CEO after having a very successful one for 20 years, and then bringing on a brand new, completely inexperienced CFO to be his right hand man?
Mate, I'm sure we all would have loved that but unfortunately, this is reality. Transfers are complicated enough and whilst I agree we could have done better, it's a bit too nit-picky at this point. We should allow for some time to pass before judging too harshly. The easy option is to sit back and criticise. I am sure we wanted to bring Thiago before we left for the tour but he chose Bayern in the end.He's not random, but he has 0 experience running a football club.
Given this is such a crucial time for United (Fergie leaving, Gill leaving) you'd of thought that the board would have a plan in place to ensure that continuity and stability are ensured as much as possible. If you created a 'post-Fergie' summer plan it would presumably look like:
1. Bring in new manager immediately, have him start as early as possible
2. Keep as much of the executive in place to manage the transition
3. Demonstrate clubs continual dominance by making marquee signing
4. Get in signings before far east tour, to give time for team to integrate with new manager
5. Keep coaching staff where possible, to give players (particularly youth) stability and maintain the 'Manchester United' feel to training/life
The only time you want to 'rock the boat' with new management is if things are going badly, or if the new management is higher profile than the old management.
Nope, all carrier pigeons over here, though we are working on using kangaroo's as a cost cutting exercise.Don't they have telephones in Australia?